logo elektroda
logo elektroda
X
logo elektroda

Electric cable in the ground does it have to be according to the design?

qwertykokos 33498 34
ADVERTISEMENT
Treść została przetłumaczona polish » english Zobacz oryginalną wersję tematu
  • #31 16799830
    Łukasz-O
    Admin of electroenergetics
    robokop wrote:

    Why? Additional cover against mechanical damage.

    In which there will be water for the entire period of operation.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #32 16799840
    robokop
    VIP Meritorious for electroda.pl
    Łukasz-O wrote:
    robokop wrote:

    Why? Additional cover against mechanical damage.

    In which there will be water for the entire period of operation.

    Łukasz, but it's the same as in any "obligatory" culvert. The cable itself, in the event of any damage to the coating, will also capillary pull itself from the ground. Anyway, they dragged themselves whole coils on the drum in the air, with no hood at the end. The only dry places I ever saw were along the tram tracks.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #33 16800306
    zbich70
    Level 43  
    Łukasz-O wrote:
    robokop wrote:

    Why? Additional cover against mechanical damage.

    In which there will be water for the entire period of operation.

    I do not understand why the cable declared by the manufacturer
    Quote:
    Application: industrial, distribution and power installations. Permanently to be installed directly in the ground. ext. and outdoors, in cable ducts, in concrete or in the water.
    Link
    or
    Quote:
    Application o for laying in channels, on structures and directly in the ground, in the water and in the air,
    Link

    laid in sand, the humidity of which can vary widely up to complete soup / pulp, or groundwater will completely rinse it out, it is less exposed than the same cable laid in a casing pipe, where the same substance flows and collects, that is, H2O.

    For my peasant reason, since the cable can lie directly in the water and it does not harm it, the water in the casing pipe does not harm it either.
    If I am wrong, please explain.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #34 16800429
    Łukasz-O
    Admin of electroenergetics
    I only stated a fact. I know that the manufacturer allows this cable to be used in water
    If I had to choose to lay the cable along its entire length with or without arota, I would choose without, precisely because of the sludge inside. I mention that this is my private opinion and you don't have to agree with it :D
  • #35 21116003
    palmus
    Level 34  
    I am faced with a similar dilemma and it seems to me that the covers are only to be where necessary.The cable should come into contact quite closely with a layer of sand which, once it has gained moisture, will dissipate any heat generated from the cable.This is somehow the result of the standards.

Topic summary

The discussion revolves around the routing of an electric cable from a pole to a house, where the original design features a zigzag pattern deemed unnecessary by the electrician. The author questions the necessity of adhering to the design, given that the cable will be buried and there are no conflicting utilities in the area. Responses highlight that while minor deviations on the property may be acceptable, the cable's route must comply with the design beyond the property line. Concerns are raised about future accessibility, potential damage, and the importance of having a spare cable length for maintenance. The necessity of using conduits for the cable is debated, with opinions varying based on soil conditions and potential water accumulation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of proper planning and adherence to regulations in electrical installations.
Summary generated by the language model.
ADVERTISEMENT