Procedure for Increasing Tauron Seal Strength: Steps and Queries on Application Submission

I needed a boost and followed these steps
1. I applied to TAURON for conditions to increase power
2. I have received the conditions and the contract.
3. I went to the ZE with a signed contract and asked you if I should submit an application for unsealing. I received an answer that the connection conditions + contract are the consent of their parties to unseal.
4. An electrician came to break the seals of the main security and replaced them with larger ones in accordance with the new conditions. He also signed me for ZI
5. I filled out the GIs and deposited them in Tauron.

Should I still apply to them for sealing?
How to possibly do it by phone or in writing, is there any printing?

I do not know which part of Poland you are from, but e.g. in the Krakow region, you should report the readiness of the installation to the emergency number 991.
The pre-meter protection should be sealed within seven days from the date of notification.

Yes, Krakow

pszczola. wrote:

4. An electrician came to break the seals of the main security and replaced them with larger ones in accordance with the new conditions. He also signed me for ZI

I had a case that the replacement of the security for a larger one was on the side of the supplier.

kSmuk wrote:

but, for example, in the Krakow region, the readiness of the installation should be reported to the emergency number 991

ZI is filled in, it is presented, for example, in Śląska Street, and they will come and seal it.

After telephone notification of the failure with a request for unsealing, they themselves come within two weeks, but this is a different procedure, the failure and the planned works.

mawerix123 wrote:

pszczola. wrote:

4. An electrician came to break the seals of the main security and replaced them with larger ones in accordance with the new conditions. He also signed me for ZI

I had a case that the replacement of the security for a larger one was on the side of the supplier.

Here I have a construction connection to a company where there is an office / social container on the square. And according to the terms, the exchange was on my side. Here I was a bit unfortunate, an electrician came, I asked an electrician what was or will not do to me at the construction site next to my square, he came, did it in 1h, signed the ZI and left.

mawerix123 wrote:

kSmuk wrote:

but, for example, in the Krakow region, the readiness of the installation should be reported to the emergency number 991

ZI is filled in, it is presented, for example, in Śląska Street, and they will come and seal it.

I can see that I have two conflicting approaches to this matter here. I took them to Łagiewnicka Street on November 16 and the silence from then on and I started to wonder where the people from ZE were going to be sealed.

I would like to make sure that it is indeed the case that in the case of connection conditions and a signed contract, it is not necessary to report unsealing?

pszczola. wrote:

I went to ZE with a signed contract and asked

If you have left a signed contract in duplicate and the ZI protocol, then almost everything on your part.

pszczola. wrote:

Should I still apply to them for sealing?

You should still pay for the increased power and that's all on your part.

Thanks to everyone for your help.

I have a second place where I increase the power in group 5, near Krakow, I got the conditions.
Currently, the connection is small, 7kW, I increase it to 21. I have a 20-year-old cable and measurement connector, with some strange "gate" locks.
There are 32A BMs in the cable one in the FR103 100A measurement one and 3 Sy, I don't remember what value
I got the conditions where it says that

Quote:

3. Connecting the facility to the network requires:
c) in the scope of connected devices, installations of the Applicant: using the existing cable power supply of the facility, adjust the security and electrical installations of the building to the increased power consumption and installation of the measuring system in the measuring set outside the building next to or above the existing cable connector.
The main security is to be compliant with the TAURON 1 / DMN / 2014 standard "

The electrician who is to do this to me says that from the above conditions it follows that a new measurement box must be built in accordance with the TAURON standard. I am not a specialist in this matter, and I am very suspicious, so I would ask for information if the electrician is right and does not want to charge me for any additional costs.

And if it is necessary to install a new measuring box, is it possible to agree with Tauron somehow to replace the whole cable and measuring connector with a box compliant with their standard, eg ZK1e-1P. Currently, the installation section is on the terminals towards the customer's network in the cable joint. Does such a change affect the place of separation of installations?

pszczola. wrote:

I am very suspicious, so I would ask for information if the electrician is right and does not want to charge me for any additional costs.

He is right, it should be done according to current standards.

According to suspicious customers, every electrician is a trickster ...
You do not trust, hire a supervisory inspector.
Personally, when I sense a suspicious client, I suggest a date for the prosthesis insertion.

I do not fully share your opinion with suspicion, because I have experienced, and unfortunately more than once, a very brazen attempt to stretch me by the performer. I commissioned the works that were described in detail in the contract and, most importantly, valued by the contractor. Fortunately, we signed the contract, because when the payment came, the price was twice as high. Then I had to quite firmly remind you that I will only pay as much as indicated in the contract.

From that moment on, as far as possible, I try to verify that the contractor of a given service does not want to deceive me in some independent source, forum, internet, among friends. It is also different with supervision inspectors.

Unfortunately, we have such times that these bad performers spoil the market with the good and honest ones.

I have one more question regarding connection issues. If I have the installation separation in the cable joint on the terminals towards the recipient installation. An electrician builds a new measuring connector, a new box next to the old one, you need to somehow connect the measuring connector with the cable one. As I saw on the Internet, opinions are divided whether it is allowed to look at the ZK which is in the hands of ZE. Whether ZE connects a cable in ZK, this was what an electrician said, from his experience it was different, but in my case he did not see a box with such a lock and he does not know if even the ZE will have a key and it should be because it belongs to them. I know that I shouldn't worry about it, but I'm curious about what it is like.

The connection conditions should include the scope of works of the supplier and the entity being connected.
As for the method of power supply between ZK and ZPL, it can be done in PPN technology or it is agreed with the supplier to disconnect the voltage.
And don't worry about the keys.

What's your lock? If you haven't bought a specific Tauron box, it may have any lock for some miniature universal keys. It should be a typical Tauron master key insert. The statement should indicate whether the WLZ requires attachment.

I also have a question from another barrel where you can buy the Tauron master key cartridge

Mostly good wholesalers. I bought in elica, but the lock and inserts should also have.