The ordered power is 20 kW and the main security for the building is 3x25 A

WojcikW wrote:

The power industry selects pre-meter protections according to the contracted capacity, i.e. the one stipulated in the contract for the supply of electricity.

pearlchili wrote:

I am reviewing the connection conditions to be issued by Tauron for one of the investments (reconstruction of a single-family house). The ordered power is to be 20 kW

masonry wrote:

It doesn't matter if he uses all his power or not.
Let ZE then charge a connection fee for 17kW and not for 20kW.
You have to go to the ZE which issued the conditions and explain it.

Strumien swiadomosci swia wrote:

Of course, here's 32A. And this is not a fad because it affects the selectivity of the entire security system.

Łukasz-O wrote:

If I were the author, I would use a power limiter

Strumien swiadomosci swia wrote:

But the Tauron writes nicely under the conditions that it is supposed to be a power limiter.

pearlchili wrote:

I am currently reviewing the connection conditions issued by Tauron for one of the investments (reconstruction of a single-family house)

pearlchili wrote:

while the main security for the building located in the cable connector is to have a value of 3x24 A.

opornik7 wrote:

In my humble opinion, the obvious mistake of writing the terms.

janek1815 wrote:

Just copying and pasting it is a pity that you do not read what you printed earlier. Then it goes to the supervisor for a signature who probably signs it "on the go" and such flowers come out. For me, at 21kW, there are already 40A security.

zbich70 wrote:

And whoever has never committed a sin, let control + V throw an escort or even a capsule first ...

opornik7 wrote:

Oh, change. But is it good?

opornik7 wrote:

Oh, change. But is it good?

opornik7 wrote:

years ago, project descriptions were written by hand and the typist typed them out. There were no errors then.