7 Days Car Return: Broken Crate, Clutch Issues, Oil Loss & Support Fluid - Can They Return?

Hi, I didn't know where to add it, but maybe someone can give me information. The case is so I exchanged cars in which I took it was not even possible to ride because the crate was broken and the clutch. However, for my car the guy ran over and didn't complain about anything and got the car warm after driving 100km so he had nothing to complain about. He liked everything, looked at him and had no doubts. However, after 2 days, he began to write me made-up things that the oil suddenly loses and the support fluid somehow after driving those 100km nothing happened and nothing was lost. Maybe something happened to him and now he wants to give back? What do you think about it can he return it or what? Thanks in advance for your reply.

Of course I have a contract. I just think this guy might have broken something because I was and I'm sure of this engine

Is there an amount on the contract that was actually paid?

Sometimes it is so that the guest asks you to enter a larger one because something ... .... and then returns the car and requests a refund

The price is exemplary because it was replacing a car for a car.

Is the price adequate to the value of the car or understated?

The price is PLN 900, I think it is adequate because there were a few things to do but there were no extractors

Present the exchange agreement - as it is worded. What are the clauses it contains? If you have in the contract a record that the guy knows the condition of the car and accepts any defects and that there is no way to return the car "because something happened to him", I do not understand what he means. He accepted the provisions of the contract, he signed it means he knew and accepted everything. He is not a child and let him not make a circus.

Exactly, on most contracts of this type there is a clause saying that the buyer is familiar with the technical condition of the vehicle. And the seller cannot be responsible for defects arising after the conclusion of the contract, even if they are not defects caused by improper use and the most ordinary wear and tear of an item.

Unfortunately, gentlemen, you are wrong, such a clause has the same meaning as the color of the ink of the pen with which we sign the contract .. Serio!

As the coolant begins to deplete, the oil will disappear after 2 weeks because someone has just bought a sharp route or, for example, the audio will get off, there is no option to prove that nothing happened with us.
And such a contract means nothing.
In court, you can win a case with a good appraiser.

Bah! traders are even introducing a guarantee, which is fiction, because it is never available.
Read legal cases on the net where someone bought a car and it turned out that it was beaten or that the engine needs to be repaired after 2 weeks and so what is the record?
These are some kind of hidden defects, even if the seller did not know about them, the appraiser can always state that after 2 hours such a thing will not be done only after half a year, e.g.

Unfortunately, such a provision of the contract is not a judgment and you can often claim, because we know the state only as it is at the moment and the leaks can be washed, add oil or liquid, some display, e.g. when it warms up, it shines when it is cold, it doesn't works etc.

Or if a cold engine is telepiece.

I also once thought that such a record and now you can sleep peacefully, unfortunately not. Apparently, the traders have some options for it, but no one wants to reveal what they add to the contract that you go behind the gate and that's it, "we close the gate and we don't know each other"

However, as for the author, a strange thing, for such a sum someone is surprised because there is something wrong
This is not a BMW for 200,000, in my opinion a sick man.
If he wants, let him take the case to court and that's it. What is there to do a lot?
Or pick up the car and that's it. I wouldn't give the money back.

Of course, you need to check what he is talking about, because he can swing, etc.

Madam? Lord? - what you write is amazing. Please provide a specific provision in civil law that says these clauses are invalid? From what you write, it appears that virtually no provisions in civil law contracts have any meaning and application, and in my opinion it is very strange and disturbing.
"Apparently, the traders have some options for this, but no one wants to reveal what they add to the contract, that you go behind the gate and that's it," we close the gate and we don't know each other. "And I don't know what to say to that ?? ?
It comes out again and the "traders" have their "tricks" and the ordinary buyer of anything (eg car, computer, etc.) has no rights.
And in this case, please indicate where there may potentially be a defect in the civil law contract, what is the sales contract or exchange contract. Obviously, theoretically, because the author did not provide us with the contract he concluded with the contractor.

This is not about the fact that these clauses are invalid, but about the fact that nobody is able to fully check the car in 100%.
It is like going on a long journey. To have to rip a half car.
Sometimes something works better when the engine is warm, something decreases gradually, does not work / works etc.

If someone will vengeful oils this entry and go from court, nobody will say in court that you have signed the contract, because the employed appraiser will declare that the defect increased for months and should be known to the seller / owner, etc.

According to me, the chances of winning anything at this point are negligible.

Yes, traders use some tricks, so when you buy a car from them you can fight a lot, I don't know, maybe they have some lawyers and somehow they can arrange the points in the contract differently.
Because they wouldn't eat it that way, but apparently it doesn't concern them, because they are professionals


It is just like a warranty on the battery, the warranty is but the defect always arises from the fault of the user and that's it.
Same here, there is this clause, but if someone persists, 90% have a winning case, because however, a small defect arises from day to day, except that we may not be aware of this fact as the owners.

Hi.
From experience I will write that if we sell a car with defects / faults and inform the buyer about it and he is aware of that he is buying a car from us then these defects should be listed in the sales contract. If, then after buying something, the buyer "visits" and wants to give us the car, he cannot demand warranty for the faults entered in the contract.
greetings