Zuzanna-ZG wrote: 200 m2 in a non-insulated house
Counting 100W / m2, this gives 20kW with frosts of -20, i.e. on an average winter day, it will be approx. 10kW, i.e. about 24m3 of gas per day, so it will not be cheap. More expensive than today, but clean and comfortable.
If you already have natural gas in your home, you can install a gas condensing boiler, because currently only fully condensing ones make sense. But all condensing boilers offer similar efficiency, so choosing a specific model or brand of boiler will not miraculously reduce gas bills in your home.
With such a large area and an uninsulated building, there will be a high demand for energy, so the importance of the minimum boiler power decreases, but it is still worth having a boiler that will offer a low minimum power, e.g. 2-function Junkers Cerapur Compact ZWB24-1 DE offers a minimum of 3.3kW, and its maximum is approx. 24kW.
If necessary, you can buy a 1-function equivalent of similar power or a slightly weaker model with a minimum of 2.2kW and a maximum of 15kW.
If you want to save, it is only through thermal modernization and replacement of windows with energy-saving ones with correct installation because an insulated building has lower losses, which means you will use less energy, which will be visible in smaller bills.
Additionally, you can lower the temperatures , i.e. in rooms where you do not usually stay, keep it, for example, at 16 degrees, so that they do not freeze.
You can heat up to 20-22 degrees Celsius only where you are on a daily basis, i.e. a room / kitchen / bathroom, which gives only 3 rooms instead of the whole house of 200 m2.
Replacing the boiler may mean the need to clean the old central heating system from sediments that have accumulated during operation, so that the exchanger in the new boiler does not become contaminated, because its efficiency will decrease despite the fact that it will be new.
A condensing boiler requires a special chimney insert, so it must be taken into account when calculating investment costs.
As for domestic hot water, a 2-function boiler heats the water in flow when you need it, but it makes sense if the boiler is close to water intake points. The length of the tubes from the boiler to the points counts. I have several meters to the bathroom, which means that after unscrewing the tap, you have to wait about 0.5 minutes before warm water from the shower comes out. If you have tubes without lagging, this time will be correspondingly longer.
Currently, the so-called DHW circulation, but it only makes sense with a water heater. Circulation raises costs, but offers the greatest comfort of domestic hot water, because you have hot water in the tap right after it is turned on, without waiting 0.5 minutes.
The flow heater has a limited capacity, as it is usually a dozen or so liters per minute.
Having a tray, the efficiency is much greater for the first several minutes, so it offers greater comfort. Hot water is available immediately, or you only wait for it to run through the pipes to the tap. If the tank is hot and you take some water to wash your hands, the boiler will not even start. However, in the case of instantaneous water heating, even the smallest flow causes heating interruption and switching the boiler to the domestic hot water mode.
You must take into account the specifics of your building, the location of the boiler room, pipe length, etc.. to find out if a tank or a 2-function boiler will be better. There are boilers on the market that have a built-in hot utility water tank with a capacity of approx. 50 liters, so it is a compromise between a 2-function boiler and a 1-function boiler + an additional tank.