Antena LTE dla modemu Huawei E3372: Wzmacniacz sygnału, TP-Link MR3220, Plus, Sławno, 800MHz

Hello,
I need an external antenna for the internet.

Equipment:
HUAWEI E3372 modem
TP link mr3220 router
Standard internal antenna with a power of a few dBi

Provider:
Plus

Parameters of:
RSSI: -69dBm
RSRP: -103dBm
"3/5 LTE bars"


[B] SpeedTest:
Taken at 5 pm:
Ping 36 ms
Download 2.27 Mb / s
Upload 2.00 Mb / S

Location:
Sławno (Łódź Voivodeship), ul. Juliusz Słowacki

Description:
Modem connected to the router to which the computer is connected via LAN cable.
I want to improve the speed of the internet.
Improving the Wi-Fi coverage in the house, because the TV that is 5-6 meters apart and two walls (including one supporting one) does not catch the signal.

PS: While writing this post, I came across the LTE Watch program, I forced 800Mhz there and admittedly the ping got slightly worse (40ms), but
already download ~ 10Mb / sa upload ~ 4Mb / s. Will there be an improvement at 800Mhz with the antenna? Is this the max of this frequency?

I thought about this antenna: ATK-20 16.5dBi LTE800 UMTS900 antenna from cyber tech
Would it be a good choice?
However, when it comes to improving the WiFi coverage, would an 8 dBi omnidirectional antenna help? (5dbi -> 8dBi, 3 dBi gain)
Could it be possible to use the antenna that is now connected to the modem?
Possibly selling this router and buying another?

Show LTEWatchH screen for E3372 on LTE800 and LTE1800, plus evening hour speed tests, check also LTE900. The closest BTS Plus are Insects from LTE1800Aero2 and LTE800Sferii. The license for Sferia's LTE800 will expire in 9 months, it is to replace the LTE900 Plus. By assumption, LTE800 Sferia and LTE900 Plus are free because it is only 5MHz in MIMO2x2 and DL up to 37Mb / s but it is possible that LTE800 is not clogged, repeat the tests in the internet peak. Very weak set, MR3220 is practically not suitable for LTE modems, it works better with HiLinks and an alternative software. Wifi range is increased by using an additional AP connected with a LAN cable to the main router. Routers have a similar range at 2.4GHz, they work with a power of 100mW limited by law.

Made around 7 p.m.
In that case, what router do you recommend, preferably not too expensive?
And what about this antenna? Search 800/900 or 1800?

The signal parameters on LTE1800 are weak, so also the speeds, it is worth checking how Plus works under the BTS in Owadowo in your direction. It will connect you with LTE1800, here Plus has 20MHz in MIMO2x2 and DL up to 150Mb / s. Under the BTS you will have the correct signal parameters. For the test, the LTE phone with the Network Cell Info application will show eNB, ECI BTS and the signal parameters. Plus speedtest. In this way, I will show what to expect from the LTE1800 with an external antenna. Test LTE800 and LTE900 with the E3372 outside. You can buy an antenna for the selected 800-900MHz or 1800MHz band or a broadband antenna.

I downloaded this app and, interestingly, when I entered it when I was at home, it shows me that I connect to the transmitter in Kunice Where there is no bts, although something has happened to my ears, that there is something like that at some school or church there, but it would rather be on the map, right?
Tomorrow I will drive to Owadowo and perform a test there, can I force the use of LTE at 1800Mhz in this application?

PS: I did the test at 23:00:
at 1800Mhz and it gave the result within DL (how do I understand the abbreviation of Download?) 6 Mb / s Upload ~ 1.5Mb / s and ping within 40ms
At 800Mhz it gives similar results except UL significantly higher ~ 4Mb / s.

Pasiol wrote:

I downloaded this app and, interestingly, when I entered it when I was at home, it shows me that I connect to the transmitter in Kunice

This map is ... worth it. Ignore her.

I did it again, this time after 2 o'clock, which gave a satisfactory result (it would be nice to have such a normal one ) on:
LTE 1800Mhz, because over 30Mb / s, with UL ~ 3Mb / s and pinging 33
LTE 900Mhz, over 14Mb / s, at UL ~ 5Mb / s and pinging 40
LTE 800Mhz, over 14Mb / s, at UL ~ 4Mb / s and pinging 30

Added after 9 [hours] 35 [minutes]:

I will take the measurement today around rush hour, but I also have a question what router should I buy then?
For LTE 1800 Mhz or LTE 800/900 Mhz antennas, both from Cybertech.
I was thinking about a used ZTE MF283 +, do you think it's worth it?

I want to be able to connect the TV to WiFi (5-6m, two walls (including one supporting)
So that I could also share that, for example, this device has, for example, 10% of the link or the maximum amount of 1 Mb / s
And that it is best for a sim card, or possibly a USB modem.

Pasiol wrote:

I was thinking about a used ZTE MF283 +, do you think it's worth it?

May be. Here you get cheap: http://allegro.pl/router-zte-mf283-polecamy-i7222353570.html
But that's not the best choice. I have yet found on the internet that it can have SIM LOCK if it is from Orange so better not.
For example, Huawei B315 is better. Very cheap here: http://allegro.pl/router-huawei-b315-i7227761848.html

Take it while it is there, because B315 is a good deal.

How much do you want to spend on the router? Because maybe it's better B525 with LTE-A category 6.

Pasiol wrote:

or possibly to a USB modem.

This is problematic. Not worth it.

Pasiol wrote:

For LTE 1800 Mhz or LTE 800/900 Mhz antennas, both from Cybertech.

I would aim faster in 1800 because 800 and 900, i.e. low-capacity range bands will quickly clog.

Up to 1800 Cybertech antenna: http://www.cybertech.com.pl/p173,antena-dualna-lte-a-4g-17dbi-mimo-1800-2600mhz.html

But Plus it works poorly for you as everywhere and don't expect a sensation, especially in the evenings. At 1800, the signal is not bad and the speed is hopeless by 19. A bit better at 800 but it is temporary for sure. However, it is worth doing a test near BTS, as he wrote @ matek451 it will become clear.

Overall, I was going to spend a maximum of PLN 200 in total.
But if you consider the antenna itself, it costs PLN 190.
So the router is best up to PLN 100, no maximum PLN 150.

makosuu wrote:

But Plus it works poorly for you as everywhere and don't expect a sensation, especially in the evenings. At 1800, the signal is not bad and the speed is hopeless by 19. A bit better at 800 but it is temporary for sure. However, it is worth doing a test near BTS, as @ matek451 wrote, it will become clear.

I know and I am aware of it, but I would like to be able to play normally when someone enters WiFi: C

makosuu wrote:

But that's not the best choice

Why? And will the one from Huawei allow me to:
"Connecting TV to WiFi (5-6m, two walls (including one supporting)
and that I could also share that, for example, this device has, for example, 10% of the link or the maximum 1 Mb / s "?

And today I will take this bts check on the phone and with a friend who lives 500m from bts, I will check on his computer how it is on different frequencies.

Pasiol wrote:

10% of bandwidth or this amount of max 1 Mb / s "?

And it is possible on ZTE? I do not know. But I can tell you that it's impossible to do with B315. Routers with LTE do not have these options because the speed is not constant, you can see for yourself.

Pasiol wrote:

"Connecting TV to WiFi (5-6m, two walls (including one supporting)

I think so. But WiFi is an individual matter. Depends on what your walls are too. But it's not far off, it should be git.

How is this ZTE so sure?

Pasiol wrote:

So the router is best up to PLN 100, no maximum PLN 150.

You can also buy Huawei E5180, but only those with the Plus / CP logo, i.e. the As-22 version, because those from, for example, T-Mobile or Play are S-22 without external antenna connectors. And he has other connectors, so you would need an appropriate connector for the antenna.
Here is a good offer: http://allegro.pl/huawei-e5180-i7226207986.html
It fits perfectly in the budget.

I already know I checked this ZTE on the plus side and there it was: ZTE MF283 V and not ZTE MF283 + hmm ..

Do you think that if I had a year left to the end of the contract (only the internet, without the device), I could extend it with the device? I would then take this ZTE MF283V and that would be a good choice, right?

Because in total, I would like to, for example, if someone turns on something on the TV, that he would get, for example, 20% speed.

And in total, such a question is whether this router is so necessary? This my TP-link mr3220 could not cope?
And then if I extended the contract, I would take the router.

Added after 11 [minutes]:

However, theoretically, if this speed increased thanks to the antenna, then maybe it could be used on two / three devices simultaneously? Then this huawei B350 would be enough to only strengthen the WiFi signal.

Pasiol wrote:

And in total, such a question is whether this router is so necessary? This my TP-link mr3220 could not cope?
And then if I extended the contract, I would take the router.

You can take a new router for an extension, but why do you want to take Plus? You can see how it works? MR-3220 is very lame, almost unserviceable on OFW for LTE modems, in addition it needs an active USB hub to power the modem. How does it work today?

Quote:

However, theoretically, if this speed increased thanks to the antenna, then maybe it could be used on two / three devices simultaneously? Then this huawei B350 would be enough to only strengthen the WiFi signal.

The speed in Plus will always be bad because BTS is clogged. If the speed is good, you will forget about bandwidth control. Anyway, some 2Mb / s ... There is nothing to divide here. ZTE according to me unprofitable, LTE cat.4 only. The operator will be the first to change. First, let this contract end, because the problem is not the signal but the load, and it won't be better.

Pasiol wrote:

Then this huawei B350 would be enough to only strengthen the WiFi signal.

The new WiFi router won't magically make you stronger. If it does not catch WiFi, you need an additional AP on the cable or a repeater. You can use the MR-3220 and it will work very well.

makosuu wrote:

but why do you want to take Plus? You can see how it works?

It does not work tragically, the internet with play wgl almost did not go, except for mobile I have radio options, but the same is in kozenin at school (right next to Owadow). And it is impossible to use the cable, so I am not complaining about the plus, because it is the only interesting option. This is the only thing I would like to download faster and that at least two devices would work at the same time. I mainly use the Internet during such hours (mainly until 6pm and after 9pm) so it's not that bad then.

makosuu wrote:

active USB hub to power the modem. How it works now

I honestly hear about this hub first, the modem plugged into the USB port directly and it works.
Added after 3 [hours] 13 [minutes]:
I did tests at the transmitter and it looks like this https://imgur.com/gallery/MvbBX

What's interesting I read is that on my TP Link I can control the bandwidth

If, with a 1800Mhz antenna, I force LTE 800Mhz, then it will work? Does it make no sense?
As for the multi-band antenna, is the 9dBi gain not enough?

It makes no sense, because this antenna does not work in this band, although it will not hurt to try. But the 800 is usually clogged up and works poorly. Don't buy broadband. Cybertech 1800-2600 17dbi is good. The BTS test looks good, especially for such an hour. Always that bad at night? Because the signal isn't all that bad.

It rarely works in such a way that, for example, a 480p film has to buffer. But as I mentioned, I want someone to connect to the wifi so that there is no lag. Because I'm going to buy a second computer soon and I would like to avoid the situation that you can only use the Internet on one of them.

By changing this router, what benefits will I have? More speed? More stable connection?