logo elektroda
logo elektroda
X
logo elektroda

Gas meter inflated bills - Gas meter overstates gas consumption.

nina281 44607 48
ADVERTISEMENT
Treść została przetłumaczona polish » english Zobacz oryginalną wersję tematu
  • #1 17271993
    nina281
    Level 10  
    Good morning. I don't know if I will ask a question in the right thread. It's about the gas meter and the fact that I have been overcharged for the last two months. The next day, I filed a complaint via ebok at PGNiG. In the reply that came in about 2 consecutive days, I only received information that if I do not agree with the bill and in my opinion my consumption is overstated, I should commission them (PGNiG) or an external laboratory to carry out an expert opinion. They added that I have to pay for the expertise if the meter works correctly - which slowed down my enthusiasm in this matter a bit. I started to wonder what could be causing the overcharged bill. I started googling. Frightening things popped out that made my hair stand on end. It was the first time I learned about neodymium magnets and read about the cases of people being framed by standardized EC procedures to pay impossible bills for allegedly stealing electricity. In the meantime, I asked the gas company questions: what could be, even theoretical, causes of damage to gas meters; is it possible that someone is stealing my gas (I just don't have the slightest idea about these things!). They have not responded for 3 days, although they responded to earlier correspondence immediately. I have prepared a complaint, the excerpt from which I am placing below (as much as needed to find out about the matter).
    The last settlement for the period April - May 2018 shows gas consumption at the level of 404 m3. Never before have my gas consumption been so high between April and May. Since the data on my PGNiG account has been archived, the consumption in m3 from 2014 onwards was as follows:
    March 18-23, 2014 - 105 m3
    March 25-27, 2015 - 125 m3
    March 26-31, 2016 - 85 m3
    March 21-25, 2017 - 212 m3 (winter heating was turned off on May 1).
    27.03-27.05.2018 - 404 m3 !!! (winter heating was turned off on April 7)
    Thus, the average consumption for 4 years in the period April - May is 131.73 m3. The last invoice is therefore higher: 300% compared to the average for the previous 4 years; 100% higher than last year's (adding the coldest April and May in years) and 400% higher than invoices from 2014-2016.
    1 / In 2018, I turned off the winter heating on April 7. In 2017, I turned off the winter heating of the house on May 1 due to a very cold April. Thus, the alleged consumption for the same period in 2018 compared to the previous year is 100% higher than in the previous year (2017), except that the heating was turned off a month (sic!) Later due to a very cold April, and therefore at least 1/2 of the bill included gas consumption for heating purposes, which was not the case this year.
    2 / Gas consumption in the 4 coldest months of the year (heating in the house turned on) was in the period: 9.11-21.01 (extended period - almost 3 months have been taken into account) - 420 m3 and in the period 21.01.-27.03 - 349 m3 - it is therefore at a LOWER level what is the consumption in the warm months, in which:
    1) the heating of the house was completely turned off, and the gas was used only to heat the bath water for 1 adult;
    2) these months (April and May 2018) were the warmest months in the history of temperature measurements, i.e. for over 200 years.
    So how could I use over 400 m3 of gas to heat water for bathing in a 1 person household ??? I have an electric stove;the heating was off; all other devices are electric (washing machine, dishwasher heat the cold water taken from the water supply).
    The questions are: can I be accused of stealing gas in the same way as they do with Electricity Management? what should I do in the current situation - order an expert opinion? if the men from the gas works come, what to expect from them, what to pay attention to so as not to blend in with some formalities? Well, I mean, for example, matters such as what to require from the documentation side, what should be the standards for carrying the meter, or can I choose a laboratory that will do an expert opinion (I would point to GUM). Well, what could be the reasons for an overvalued bill?
    The gas meters are located outside the building, on the side wall (they are twins), generally accessible, but in a chest that can be opened with a yellow plastic key (not a lock).
    Another thing. In winter, I saved a lot on heating. I was alone at home, my husband went abroad for a few months for the job he had lost in Poland. I only heated the room in which I lived and slept, and the bathrooms - unlike all previous years, where I followed the advice of the people from the stove to always heat evenly (this experience showed me how many hundreds and thousands a year I was flushing with ... gas). We live on 1, my salary. I managed to save about PLN 400-500 on winter heating over 4 months (compared to the same period a year earlier). I was very happy about it. Until receipt of the current invoice ...
    When I counted everything up nicely and read it, it turned out that if the last invoice was for the normal standard average kWh consumption (comparing the available previous years and those specific months), I would have fallen into ... a lower tariff, from W-3 to W-2 .. And here very ugly thoughts about PGNiG came to me. Can gassing manipulate the meter? Temporarily speed it up? Maybe such "acceleration" will be "amortized" one day, but it will be ... after the end of my contract year, that is, I will stay in a higher, more expensive tariff. Maybe they monitor clients like me (I have always been - as it turned out only now, previously I had only a vague idea that there are some tariffs, but nothing closer - at the limit of tariffs, exceeding them by 200-300 m3)? on the border of two tariffs? Anyone have any idea what this is about?
    On Sunday afternoon I turned off the stove and took a picture of the gas meter. I'll turn it on tomorrow morning. I want to check if the meter charged another kWh.
    I'm in dead end. I don't know what to do or think. The husband keeps saying that it must be a mistake and to have the counter checked. But I'm scared after everything I've read here ...
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #2 17276175
    magir
    Level 29  
    As for the meter itself, its indications do not have to be distorted, but the calorific value of the gas may already differ significantly from what it is supposed to be - but it will be very difficult to prove it. From what I read, among others, on the electrode forum, it is difficult to harm the gas meter with the help of magnets, due to the fact that the entire housing is made of steel, so there is almost no possibility of the field influencing the measuring elements. The meter does not have to be checked, because you can check if it is ok by comparing the indications with the reference meter with which the employees of the distributor will come to the customer. It is rather certain that the indications of this from home will be within tolerance, which will only result in an extra charge for all the fun. I recommend an article on the web - how I became a gas thief. In a nutshell - it works like this - are you afraid because you stole? you will pay and peace of mind - you did not steal - you fight and they will let go ........ this is how it works.
  • #3 17277036
    retrofood
    VIP Meritorious for electroda.pl
    nina281 wrote:
    It's about the gas meter and the fact that I have been overcharged for the last two months.

    Any substantive answer is impossible because you do not provide any information about the meter. Type, model, manufacturer ... anyway, all the information on it. This is necessary, because what are we to talk about when we have only words at our disposal? Read point 3.1.15 of the forum rules.
  • #4 17277738
    nina281
    Level 10  
    I'll take pictures of the counter. How can I agree to pay for gas that I have definitely not consumed, legally or illegally? I consume 1/4 of this size. Should I pay PLN 750 instead of PLN 200? This is daylight robbery. How "will it be difficult to prove the calorific value of gas"? I have to prove it? Kind of like :-(
  • #5 17277803
    Anonymous
    Level 1  
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #6 17277828
    jack63
    Level 43  
    I would do some simple trials first, because maybe the counter is Ok but something is wrong with the boiler or the installation.
    Check if any gas appliance is not working and ensure it is not working for a longer period of time. E.g. overnight. Write down the odometer. in the evening and in the morning. It should be the same!
  • #7 17277887
    jdubowski
    Tube devices specialist
    nina281 wrote:
    and the gas was used only to heat the bath water for 1 adult;
    Flow heater or boiler, maybe with circulation?
    nina281 wrote:
    How "will it be difficult to prove the calorific value of gas"?
    The caloric content can fluctuate by 20%, not that much.
    drobok wrote:
    I would think of:
    -stove / gas stove that you have
    -water heater
    -boiler or other system which you heat the apartment
    - too much unsealing of windows / lack of wall insulation, etc.
    The problem after the heating season, so the last point is not there. But the installation is also tight, especially when the gas meter is in the cabinet at the plot border or on the external wall, and then the pipe is in the ground or on the facade.
    Gas system inspection with leak test when was it? I am talking about a real test and not about a situation in which the foreman issued a protocol for a bottle?
    nina281 wrote:
    Can gassing manipulate the meter? Temporarily speed it up? Maybe such "acceleration" will be "amortized" one day, but it will be ... after the end of my contract year, that is, I will stay in a higher, more expensive tariff.
    Manipulate no, but may make a reading error.
  • #8 17277961
    gimak
    Level 41  
    jack63 wrote:
    Check if any gas appliance is not working and ensure it is not working for a longer period of time. E.g. overnight. Write down the odometer. in the evening and in the morning. It should be the same!

    And it will be the same if the meter is mechanical and the installation is tight (and if it is leaky, it should smell like gas). Gas meter mechanism, drives the gas flowing through it. Therefore, the counter cannot by itself (if it was counting correctly before), start counting more than it should, it can possibly count less than it should, and this may be caused by increased resistance of the counting mechanism.
  • #9 17277994
    DiZMar
    Level 43  
    gimak wrote:
    jack63 wrote:
    Check if any gas appliance is not working and ensure it is not working for a longer period of time. E.g. overnight. Write down the odometer. in the evening and in the morning. It should be the same!

    And it will be the same if the meter is mechanical and the installation is tight (and if it is leaky, it should smell like gas). Gas meter mechanism, drives the gas flowing through it. Therefore, the counter cannot by itself (if it was counting correctly before), start counting more than it should, it can possibly count less than it should, and this may be caused by increased resistance of the counting mechanism.

    So why the overstated indication? Someone has already hooked you behind the meter? Do miracles, Lord?
    PS.
    The counter may start to inflate. There is no certainty that damaged is only to the benefit of the recipient.
  • #10 17278126
    jdubowski
    Tube devices specialist
    gimak wrote:
    the meter is mechanical, and the installation is tight (and if it is leaky, it should smell like gas).


    Unless the leak is in the open air - a joint at the gas meter stub or a broken pipe weld on the facade.
  • #11 17278929
    gimak
    Level 41  
    With such a significantly increased consumption (as provided by the author), it would even be captured in the open air. I think that someone will connect to the gas as unlikely, because it is not as easy and quick as connecting to the electricity. So doing it unnoticeably is unlikely in my opinion, but it can be checked, gas pipes are usually led on top. I do not know how to explain this case, but the reason may be similar to that in some topic about water meters, and there, after long processions, experts not related to the water supply system stated that in this copy of the meter (mechanism) there could have been an uncontrolled jump of one meter plate forward . I do not know if this is possible, because I have not met with such a case that the shield jumps too much forward than it should. It happened to me, however, that the shield stopped.
  • #12 17279440
    maurycy123
    Conditionally unlocked
    gimak wrote:
    experts not related to the water supply system stated that in this particular copy of the counter (mechanism) there could have been an uncontrolled leap of one counter plate forward. I do not know if it is possible, because I have not met with such a case that the shield jumps too much forward than it should.
    I had such a case. The average water consumption in the settlement period is about 30 m3. And in the next period, 130 m3. At first there was a suspicion of a leak. After writing down the main counter and residents counters, it turned out that my counter showed about 100 m3 too much. A friend of the waterworks told me that there are such copies of meters that if you hit them, the abacus can jump. As for neodymium magnets and gas meters. Bellows gas meters are installed at (non-industrial) customers. The bellows is permanently attached to the abacus. So the magnet cannot interfere with the measurement of the gas taken in. At most, it can stop (if it is possible at all) the gas meter, but there will be no gas. The matter with the water meters is different. There is no connection between the water part and the meter there. The connection between them is via a magnetic field. A magnet is attached to both parts. Therefore, it was possible to stop the counter with neodymium. So finding the magnetization of the gas meter housing and thus its wrong counting is a fake.

    Added after 3 [minutes]:

    jdubowski wrote:
    Unless the leak is in the open air - a joint at the gas meter stub or a broken pipe weld on the facade.
    With the gas devices turned off, you would see and hear that the gas meter is working.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #13 17279466
    gimak
    Level 41  
    maurycy123 wrote:
    The matter with the water meters is different. There is no connection between the water section and the meter. The connection between them is via a magnetic field.

    These are "dry" meters, but there are also "wet" meters - the counter is flooded with water and there is no magnetic clutch.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #14 17279617
    maurycy123
    Conditionally unlocked
    gimak wrote:
    These are "dry" meters, but there are also "wet" meters - the counter is flooded with water and there is no magnetic clutch.
    I have not met with such people, but I have not seen everything in my life.
  • #15 17280483
    nina281
    Level 10  
    I'm sorry I broke the rules. Provides the counter data.

    Metrix meter apator group G4 (in inverted triangle "B") 6G4L
    Qmax = 6 m3 / h
    Qmin = 0.04 m3 / h
    V = 2.2dm3
    Pmax = 50kPa
    1imp = 0.01m3
    tm = -25 degrees C ... 55 degrees C.

    D 03
    7,122.58
    Big T on the right
    There is also the date 2007 next to the counter number

    At the top, next to "bar code" 07 M 6G4L 130 00110591

    Experiment excluding the furnace:
    Before switching off 17115282/3
    After restarting after 4 days (turned off Sun in the evening, on Thursday evening) 17115.435

    The whole installation is on the side of the building, the pipes partly run in the ground. I'll take a picture.
    Vitopend 100 furnace and Vitocel 100 boiler. Fuel 6250 (such annotation in the service document). Recently serviced by the Viesmann factory service in 10.2016 the main board of the regulator was replaced.
    I do not know when the leakage inspection was carried out by PGNIG. I did not sign anything and the installation with meters is outside - no one says whether or not they are doing something. Perhaps the administration knows - I will ask.
    Maybe you smelled gas twice when you opened the box. I never opened it before, for the whole 9 years I've lived here.
    Attachments: To view the material on this forum you must be logged in.
  • #16 17280496
    jack63
    Level 43  
    nina281 wrote:
    Experiment excluding the furnace:
    Before switching off 17115282/3
    After restarting after 4 days (turned off Sun in the evening, on Thursday evening) 17115.435

    Could you write it legibly?
    It is not known what the "experiment" was and what are its results?
  • #17 17280520
    nina281
    Level 10  
    I turned off the stove on Sunday evening, after writing down the meter reading, and turned it on again Thursday evening, also after writing down the meter reading. This was to check if the counter keeps spinning even though the gas consumption is 0.
    I have given the readings of the "before and after" counter above. Slightly, but different - I don't know if it matters, what is the inertia of such a device?
  • #18 17280527
    Inkwizycja
    Level 30  
    Jack63 is not a picture of this Lady's meter. The numbers and states do not match. The experiment showed only that 0.153m? of gas was released for 4 days (I assumed that the last digit "3" was added for free :D ).
  • #19 17280536
    DiZMar
    Level 43  
    nina281 wrote:
    ...
    Experiment excluding the furnace:
    Before switching off 17115282/3
    After restarting after 4 days (turned off Sun in the evening, on Thursday evening) 17115.435
    ...

    So let's count.
    Before shutdown 17115282/3
    minus when turned on 17115,435
    ===================
    - 17098167 whether the counter "turned"
    A bit of accuracy when entering numerical data.
    Seriously, this consumption was probably (after corrections of the given nonsense versions of the readings) 0.153 m?, ie approx. 1.7kWh (conversion factor 1m? = 11-11.5 kWh. Depending on the gas quality). That is, despite not using gas, the meter rotated around 0.04 m? / day (about 045 kWh / day). This gives approx. 1.2 m? / month, that is approx. 13.5 kWh / month, addition to the actual consumption. These are pennies in total, although the meter can greatly increase the actual consumption when in use compared to when not in use.
  • #20 17280547
    nina281
    Level 10  
    Thanks for the calculations. The counter was very carefully written - this was the condition. Please forgive yourself emotional and judgmental statements like "nonsense". Thank you.

    Please hold back your emotions. The forum is not a good place for such comments. [retrofood]
  • #21 17280564
    jack63
    Level 43  
    nina281 wrote:
    The counter was carefully written - that was the condition.

    It is you who hold back your emotions and write accurately!
    Can't you write the meter reading properly so that you don't have to guess what you mean?
    After all, you have a problem, so try. You get some advice and some thought for FREE, so you probably don't value it ...
    The question is, have you read your meter or maybe your neighbors?
    Or maybe the collector did it ???
  • #22 17280573
    DiZMar
    Level 43  
    nina281 wrote:
    Thanks for the calculations. The counter was carefully written - that was the condition. Please forgive yourself emotional and judgmental statements like "nonsense". Thank you

    nina281 wrote:
    ...
    Experiment excluding the furnace:
    Before switching off 17115282/3
    After restarting after 4 days (turned off Sun in the evening, on Thursday evening) 17115.435
    ...

    Then read what you wrote.
    17115282/3 and 17115,435 later this would be a literal list of two different devices. Not only are you a mess (the counter on Sunday was 8 digits and the ninth after the sign / and on Thursday, five digits and three more digits after the decimal point), you still confirm your own nonsense. Get hold of yourself and read it several times before posting another post.

    Added after 4 [minutes]:

    If the author of the topic is not able to correctly rewrite the meter readings (after paying attention, he is still offended by sic! He insists on his), it is difficult to have confidence in the correctness of the data provided from invoices, which is much more complicated than a simple rewriting from the window. In general, the whole topic should go to the trash.
  • #23 17280620
    nina281
    Level 10  
    I can't help it, these were the meter readings. Yes, I am a very precise person, although non-technical, so I wrote down the counter, for sure, and mine for sure - I checked it several times?
    I do not take offense; I just think you can talk about such things relatively calmly. No epithets. Thank you for your willingness to help. However, if you feel that I am taking advantage of you and underestimating you, you don't need to help. Best regards and I wish you less emotions and cooling down.
    I am giving these counters again.
    Before (shutdown) 17115.282 / 3
    After: (restarting the stove) 17115,435
    According to my assessment, the numerator has probably not moved back.
    One thing is right - I forgot about the decimal point (if it's a comma - it's 3 digits in red.)
  • #24 17280627
    DiZMar
    Level 43  
    nina281 wrote:
    ...
    She lists the counters again.
    Before 17115,282 / 3
    After: 17,115,435
    According to my assessment, the meter did not go back.
    One thing is right - I forgot about the decimal point.

    And these / 3 it was on Sunday (before) and not on Thursday (after)? Is it the same meter or is it 2 different meters? How can you be sure that you have been correctly prescribed several times and then keep on feeding with errors? Rhetorical question.

    Added after 2 [minutes]:

    nina281 wrote:
    I can't help it, these were the indications of the licxnik. Yes, I am a very accurate person, although non-technical, so I wrote the meter down correctly, and mine for sure - I checked it several times?
    ...

    If this is what a very precise person who wrote down properly after checking it several times, I will sneak out.
  • #25 17280642
    nina281
    Level 10  
    The "3" is "broken" (the numerator was, on the last digit, between 2 and 3, so I wrote 2/3).
  • #26 17280651
    DiZMar
    Level 43  
    nina281 wrote:
    The "3" is "broken" (the numerator was, on the last digit, between 2 and 3, so I wrote 2/3).

    It is only now, after so many remarks, that we finally know what the meter indicated? What if she wrote posts not necessarily
    Quote:
    a very thorough person
    ? Surely explaining would take several days?
  • #27 17280655
    nina281
    Level 10  
    Inkwizycja wrote:
    Jack63 is not a picture of this Lady's meter. The numbers and states do not match. The experiment showed only that 0.153m? of gas was released for 4 days (I assumed that the last digit "3" was added for free :D ).


    Of course my count is not in the photos. In my post I wrote: "The whole installation is on the side of the building, the pipes partly run in the ground. I will take photos". And "3" is the last digit from the counter that showed the phase of "transition" from 2 to 3. THIS is my counter, the state before it was turned off.
    Inquisition, thanks for introducing a little humor and for relaxing the atmosphere?
    There are also (in the box with counters) two such clocks:
    Attachments: To view the material on this forum you must be logged in.
  • #28 17280673
    DiZMar
    Level 43  
    nina281 wrote:
    ..
    Of course, my count is not in the photos. ...

    In addition, photos of the installation are not without explanation why. And I thought that all the ambiguities had been cleared up. The hands drop.
  • #29 17280682
    Strumien swiadomosci swia
    Level 43  
    Just do an experymet, turn the boiler on for 0.5h at full power and determine the gas consumption.
    The rest is deliberation, do you have a collector every 2 months or what?
  • #30 17280696
    nina281
    Level 10  
    Why do you assume it's not my installation? I wrote that it was not my counter. I just opened one cupboard door (in the photo you can see there are two doors). There are 4 or 5 counters in the cabinet. Mine is behind the cupboard door that was locked at the time of the photo. I did not take a picture of the meter, but I wanted to show the route of the pipes - some of them are in the ground - someone previously wrote that leaks may appear in such a situation. However, it is known that when I take a photo of an open cabinet with counters = there are counters in it = one of them will be found in the picture.

Topic summary

The discussion revolves around a user experiencing inflated gas bills attributed to a gas meter that allegedly overstates consumption. The user filed a complaint with PGNiG but was advised to seek an expert opinion at their own expense if they disagreed with the bill. Various responses suggest potential causes for the inflated readings, including issues with the gas appliances (stove, boiler, water heater), the calorific value of the gas, and possible leaks in the installation. Some participants discuss the difficulty of manipulating gas meters with neodymium magnets, emphasizing that mechanical meters should not inflate readings without external factors. The user provided specific meter details and conducted tests to monitor gas consumption, revealing minimal usage when appliances were turned off. The conversation highlights the importance of accurate meter readings and the potential for systemic issues affecting multiple users in the same area.
Summary generated by the language model.
ADVERTISEMENT