logo elektroda
logo elektroda
X
logo elektroda

Wireless ABAX 2 New Generation: Differences, Support for Existing Devices & Changes

SMDmaniak 4806 24
ADVERTISEMENT
Treść została przetłumaczona polish » english Zobacz oryginalną wersję tematu
  • #1 17286695
    SMDmaniak
    Level 23  
    Hello,
    What will be the difference and will the support for existing devices change?
    greetings
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #2 17318005
    Qerek
    Level 12  
    greater range and new devices, e.g. controllers for 230V sockets
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #4 17318891
    Qerek
    Level 12  
    - remote software update for all wireless devices
    - range in open space up to 2km
    - AES encryption
    - wireless outdoor curtain
    - flush mount and power socket
    - miniature expander
    and that's all I remember from the fair
  • #5 17318926
    SMDmaniak
    Level 23  
    Is it backward compatible?

    pozdr
  • #6 17318940
    Qerek
    Level 12  
    with ordinary abax he can't
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #7 17320440
    SMDmaniak
    Level 23  
    Thank you. It turns out that the old ACU-100 and ACX-100 are useful as a connector to ABAX 2. And when will it be?

    pozdr
  • #8 17320442
    Qerek
    Level 12  
    I do not know. I don't think they know the dates when they will be released.
  • #9 17852752
    scorpik77
    Level 12  
    Information from before 20 min. Distribution from 01/04/2019
  • #10 17853702
    fred4u
    Level 27  
    Will INTEGRA WRL2 go to the trash?
  • #11 17853739
    sciacho
    Level 18  
    range up to 2km MUHAHAAHAHAHAHA I've seen it somewhere ... ACU-120 range up to 500m
  • #12 17854069
    fred4u
    Level 27  
    Well, that's the whole truth. Have you seen ACU-120 communicate MORE than 500m? ...
    ... me neither. So at least they don't stretch ;)
  • #13 19122360
    lukbok
    Level 9  
    Hi,

    In my home from the 70s there is an abax2 controller (ACU280) and on the opposite side of the house a gate with a reed switch (AXD-200) and no range (well, maybe once every 30 days it will appear).
    I couldn't believe it at first and checked another AXD-200. Same.
    This is some kind of massacre.
    Before you buy, check it out because what the satellite writes is cheating and bending reality.

    greetings
    Luke
  • #14 19122368
    sciacho
    Level 18  
    because these controllers from the 70s 8-O they were lame.
  • #15 19122599
    niebieskipolo
    Level 26  
    lukbok wrote:
    what the satel writes is cheating and bending reality

    Where does Satel say that it will work for you?
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #16 19122621
    dariusz.bembenek
    Stationary Alarms specialist
    I understand that range tests were carried out using a suitable tester before the devices were installed? If not, then we have nothing to discuss.

    Added after 3 [minutes]:

    lukbok wrote:
    Before you buy, check it out

    You are right about that. Before purchasing target wireless devices, check that the site's signal will be "ok". Just using the right methods and means. Satel does not promise anything here. It is up to the professional to decide whether or not to enter a given system in a given location.
  • #17 19122719
    lukbok
    Level 9  
    Hello,

    there are abax1 and abax2 controllers and devices in the system
    I do not have the abax2 tester, and the abax1 tester at the installation site of the AXD-200 detector showed 60% and 45% range.
  • #18 19122938
    alster1
    CCTV and Stationary Alarms specialist
    lukbok wrote:
    the abax1 tester at the installation site of the AXD-200 detector showed 60% and 45% range.

    lukbok wrote:
    wicket with a reed switch (AXD-200)


    Maybe the problem is not Abax but a metal gate.
    a quote from the AXD-200 manual:
    "When choosing the place of installation, remember that thick walls, metal partitions, etc. will reduce the range of the radio signal."
  • #19 19126302
    wikingpk
    Level 13  
    lukbok wrote:
    the abax2 controller (ACU280) and on the opposite side of the house a gate with a reed switch (AXD-200) and no range (well, maybe once every 30 days it will appear).

    Change antenna = (remove jumper) from vertical to horizontal.
  • #20 19126866
    dariusz.bembenek
    Stationary Alarms specialist
    wikingpk wrote:
    Change antenna = (remove jumper) from vertical to horizontal.

    The inquirer has the ACU-280 module, while the option to change the antenna is only available in the ACU-220.
  • #21 19132478
    lukbok
    Level 9  
    A good idea with this gate - I will buy 5 different gates and check which range will be.
    Now another thing has occurred to me - a bit of plaster. The wall will be thinner, maybe it will work :)
  • #22 19132648
    alster1
    CCTV and Stationary Alarms specialist
    lukbok wrote:
    A good idea with this gate - I will buy 5 different gates and check which range will be.
    Now another thing has occurred to me - a bit of plaster. The wall will be thinner, maybe it will work :)

    I don't know why you are ironic, after all, you have a problem, not us, we are just trying to help.
    If you have a wireless sensor bolted to a metal structure, it has the right to have a shorter range.
    This is a commonly known phenomenon, the problem occurs e.g. with proximity card readers mounted on metal elements, reed switches are also available in versions for metal doors.
    Sometimes it is enough to use a spacer made of non-magnetic material and the problem is solved.
  • #23 19132683
    lukbok
    Level 9  
    Hi,

    the wicket is wooden and the sensor is screwed to the concrete post.
    By this irony, I want to say that such testing is pointless if there is currently no coverage.
    Even if I moved it and the range appears, it may turn out that the next day, in other weather, the range will not be available again. It does not make sense.
    I didn't expect any help from you because in this case it won't help.
    Through my post, I wanted to convey that you should not fully believe what is conveyed in Satellite advertising materials - as a reminder, the range indicator indicated 45 and 60%, and the abax2 was to be the successor (better, more modern) of abax1.
    Satel writes about a range of 1600 m in the open area and that the system is used to protect the facility and around it. In this case, is it not possible to expect a range of 10-15 m in a traditional house (not reinforced concrete)?
    As you can see no.

    The conclusion is that the target devices have to be installed and tested for a few days.
  • #24 19133916
    kood
    CCTV and Stationary Alarms specialist
    lukbok wrote:
    Through my post, I wanted to convey that you should not fully believe what is conveyed in Satellite advertising materials - as a reminder, the range indicator indicated 45 and 60%, and the abax2 was to be the successor (better, more modern) of abax1.


    Because Abax2 is a better and more modern successor, the problem is that you have no experience in installing such devices, plus you do not follow the assembly instructions, these are the effects.

    In houses of 300 sq m, the signal does not drop below 70%, the outbuildings next door are not a problem either. They cope with factories where the level of interference is incomparably higher than in homes. In the open area, the range exceeds that declared by the manufacturer.
    With Abax1, the range was different and there were problems even to secure the house itself.
  • #25 19135777
    Itaktojest
    Level 5  
    I have ACX-220 in a building several meters from the house and it is always 100%. I also had a problem with the AXD 200, the included batteries have too much insulated minus and inserting the battery too deep turns the detector off. A stronger knock on the housing caused the battery to move, which I found out only after reporting the failure by the control panel.

Topic summary

The discussion revolves around the Wireless ABAX 2 New Generation, highlighting its differences from the previous version, including enhanced range (up to 2 km in open space), support for new devices like controllers for 230V sockets, and features such as AES encryption and remote software updates. However, backward compatibility with existing ABAX devices is limited, as older models like ACU-100 and ACX-100 can only serve as connectors. Users express concerns about the actual range performance, with some reporting issues in specific installations, particularly in older homes. The conversation emphasizes the importance of proper installation and testing to ensure reliable operation, as environmental factors can significantly affect signal strength.
Summary generated by the language model.
ADVERTISEMENT