logo elektroda
logo elektroda
X
logo elektroda

Installing PEX System for Cold and Hot Water Circulation: Comparing Wavin and Kisan Sizes

codigo 18090 8
ADVERTISEMENT
Treść została przetłumaczona polish » english Zobacz oryginalną wersję tematu
  • #1 17674524
    codigo
    Level 2  
    Hi,

    I am preparing to install cold and hot water with circulation in PEX system. I found these diagrams in Wavin materials:
    Installing PEX System for Cold and Hot Water Circulation: Comparing Wavin and Kisan Sizes

    I was initially planning to do the circulation as follows:
    Installing PEX System for Cold and Hot Water Circulation: Comparing Wavin and Kisan Sizes

    However, example 3 from the first diagram solves the problem of lack of circulation on the section "tee - faucet connection", so hot water should fly without delay. The problem that arises is the size of the through fixed tees that are available to implement the installation according to example 3. Wavin produces them in sizes 16x1/2x16 and 20x1/2x20, while Kisan only 16x1/2x16. As for the regular elbows established, both one and the other manufacturer offer them in sizes 16x1/2, 20x1/2 and 20x3/4.

    The diameter of the "riser" for cold and hot water is 25mm. The first in line will be the shower (according to the Wavin pipe diameter selection calculator, the recommended diameter is 25mm), followed by 2 sinks (16mm) and the kitchen sink (16mm). Due to the lack of through tees and elbows established in the size of 25mm for the shower, I want to make a connection tee 25x16x20 + elbow 20x3/4. To the tee connect a through tee Kisan 16x1/2x16 (the first sink), to it another the same (the second sink) and another (the sink). I'm wondering whether, with such an installation, there will be a problem with water pressure in case of simultaneous use of, for example, a shower, sink and basin? Should I use the larger Wavin 20x1/2x20 through tees, or stay with the originally planned solution?

    Greetings,
    Kamil.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #2 17674592
    Zutket
    Level 36  
    It is a very good idea to do the installation in accordance with figure 2.Admittedly, the cost at the beginning is greater, but in operation very useful. Especially when you need to repair from any of the taps. Instead of dumping water from the whole installation, you close the circuit in question and make the repair.
    What about circulation. It all depends on the distance of the shower from the hot water tank. If small, then circulation is rather unnecessary and unnecessarily generates costs. The cost of running the circulation pump, the cost of heating the water after cooling in the circulation.
  • #3 17675035
    codigo
    Level 2  
    Zutket wrote:
    It is a very good idea to do the installation according to Figure 2.
    I initially considered this, however, I could not find anywhere manifolds with PZH certification that can be used for domestic water. In addition, with this approach, there is still the problem of cooled water on the section "manifold - faucet".

    Zutket wrote:
    While the cost at the beginning is greater, but in operation very useful. Especially when you need to repair from any of the taps. Instead of dumping water from the entire system, you close the circuit in question and make the repair.

    There will be faucets tightened to the elbows established, so there will be no need to dump water from the entire system.

    Zutket wrote:
    What about circulation. It all depends on the distance of the shower from the hot water tank. If small, then circulation is rather unnecessary and unnecessarily generates costs. The cost of running the circulation pump, the cost of heating the water after cooling in the circulation.


    The distance is significant, so the circulation is necessary, especially since the wastewater is discharged to the septic tank. Circulation I want to do to each hot water point. I plan to use a Leszno Erga pump with a maximum power of 9W, so the cost of powering it will not be significant. Of course, as you wrote, it is necessary to reckon with the need to heat the water cooled in the circulation.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • Helpful post
    #4 17679954
    Plumpi
    Heating systems specialist
    codigo wrote:

    I initially considered this, however, nowhere have I found manifolds with PZH certification that can be used for domestic water. In addition, with this approach, there is still the problem of cooled water on the section "reducer - faucet".

    What kind of reducer do you have in mind?
    If a pressure regulator then it is mounted on the main pipe supplying both cold water and hot water circuits.

    Any stainless steel or plastic manifold can be used for domestic water. There is a large selection in plumbing wholesalers.

    You can always buy PP connectors and grommets yourself, or buy tees and stainless nipples and screw them together.

    The only thing you need to know is that when doing an installation with manifolds, you must use 3 manifold strips. One for cold water and two for hot water (supply + circulation). There are 3 pipes to each faucet.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #5 17682725
    codigo
    Level 2  
    Plumpi wrote:
    Which reducer do you have in mind?
    I made a mistake when writing the answer - it was supposed to be "distributor - battery". I corrected the post.

    Plumpi wrote:
    You just need to know that when doing an installation with manifolds you need to use 3 manifold strips. One for cold water and two for hot water (supply + circulation). There are 3 pipes to each faucet.

    Won't we have an analogous problem with such a solution, as in the case of several risers with circulation and the lack of balancing valves on the circulation pipe in each riser, only that "on a micro scale", that is, the longer the pipe from the faucet to the circulation manifold, the worse the exchange of hot water?

    I come to the conclusion that the best solution in terms of circulating efficiency will be a tee system, in which directly to the tee there will be a fixed elbow, to it a faucet, and then a hose and a faucet. I just don't know if this is the way it should be done. And if not, why not?
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #6 17683905
    romano78
    Level 16  
    I did the hot water on manifolds and it is a good option if there is one bathroom if there are more then I prefer on Trojans.And everyone does according to figure 4 at least in my area , complicate yourself installation for about 2seconds I do not know if it is worth it.
  • #7 17686678
    Plumpi
    Heating systems specialist
    codigo wrote:

    With this solution, won't we have an analogous problem as in the case of several risers with circulation and no balancing valves on the circulation pipe in each of the risers, only that "on a micro scale", that is, the longer the pipe from the faucet to the circulation manifold, the worse the exchange of hot water?



    The plumbing in the house is too small to need balancing valves.

    codigo wrote:

    I come to the conclusion that the best solution in terms of circulating efficiency will be a tee system, in which directly to the tee there will be a fixed elbow, to it a faucet, and then a hose and a faucet. I just don't know if this is the way it should be done. And if not, why not?


    But here you have not discovered anything new, because this is how it is done.
    There are even special elbows with a foot with 2 approaches or whole strips, both
    in the Pex system and PP

    https://onninen.pl/en-PL/article/circulation-warm-water-wavin
    https://www.pp-plumber.com.pl/komplet-nascien...zelotowy-fi20-na-12cala-pp-plumber-p-270.html

    But I'll tell you that doing Pex the easiest way is to go around the room in question in a loop along the floor with 20mm pipe, and from this loop you go off in straight sections of 16mm under the valves to the faucets. For this purpose, you install reducing tees Pex 20-16-20
    Since the approaches are now made under sinks, the length of a single pipe from the loop to the valve does not exceed 1m. This is a really small section. Especially since hot water will circulate by gravity anyway in this vertical section of 16mm pipe. The circulation loop pipe is laid between the first and second layers of Styrofoam.

    Added after 2 [minutes]:

    romano78 wrote:
    I've done cwu on manifolds and it's a good option if there's one bathroom if there's more I prefer on Trojans.and everyone is doing according to figure 4 at least in my area, complicate yourself installation for about 2seconds I don't know if it's worth it.


    Only why make a manifold for one bathroom?
    If you make a manifold is on the principle of successive circuits to successive rooms, and in a particular room already branched by tees.
  • #8 17688159
    codigo
    Level 2  
    Plumpi wrote:
    The installation in the house is too small for balancing valves to be needed.
    What conditions must occur for balancing outlets to be justified and needed?
    Plumpi wrote:
    But here you have not discovered anything new, because this is how it is done.
    There are even special elbows with a foot with 2 approaches or whole strips, both
    in the Pex system and PP


    https://onninen.pl/pl-PL/artykul/cyrkulacja-cieplej-wody-uzytkowej-wavin
    https://www.pp-plumber.com.pl/komplet-nascien...zelotowy-fi20-na-12cala-pp-plumber-p-270.html

    I wrote about this in the first post - the problem I see is the lack of such elbows/strips with a larger diameter at the entrance. Here we have 20, and, for example, for a shower with a rain shower a larger diameter is needed. In this situation, I guess the only thing left to do is to do as I wrote, that is, to make something along the lines of such an elbow/leaf yourself.
  • #9 18200303
    doromik
    Level 12  
    I have had gravity circulation for 20 years and it works. No pumps, no valves. Just return taps from the risers made with pipes of smaller diameter. It is advisable to have one throttling valve before the very return to the boiler so that the consumers are not supplied with cold water. He replaces the one-way valve, which at b. low flow rates does not work. Fact; it is impossible to control the flow as with a pump and it is also difficult to estimate heat loss. The solution is not for the perfectionist, but there is a holy peace of mind. I recommend.
  • Topic summary

    The discussion revolves around the installation of a PEX system for cold and hot water circulation, comparing the sizes of components from Wavin and Kisan. The user initially planned a circulation system but faced challenges with the availability of fixed tees in the required sizes. Responses highlight the importance of circulation based on the distance from the hot water tank, the necessity of using manifolds, and the potential for gravity circulation without pumps. Various installation strategies are debated, including the use of balancing valves and the efficiency of different configurations. The Leszno Erga pump is mentioned as a cost-effective option for circulation.
    Summary generated by the language model.
    ADVERTISEMENT