logo elektroda
logo elektroda
X
logo elektroda
Advanced Search
logo elektroda

[Solved] Best Budget SSD for System: Crucial BX500 vs. Kingston A400 – TLC vs. MLC Comparison

kelvin0909 20622 31
ADVERTISEMENT
Treść została przetłumaczona polish » english Zobacz oryginalną wersję tematu
| New topic
  • #31 17865704
    kelvin0909
    Level 4  
    dt1 wrote:
    If you absolutely want to save 40 zlotys, buy 120GB, because you have been writing about it for 30 posts. You got arguments why you should buy 240GB - nothing new in this topic will come up. Buy yourself 120, 240GB, or how much is right.


    I am sorry for unnecessary posts, so I close the topic.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #32 17865708
    kelvin0909
    Level 4  
    dt1 wrote:
    If you absolutely want to save 40 zlotys, buy 120GB, because you have been writing about it for 30 posts. You got arguments why you should buy 240GB - nothing new in this topic will come up. Buy yourself 120, 240GB, or how much is right.


    I am sorry for unnecessary posts, so I close the topic.

    Added after 1 [minutes]:

    I close the topic
| New topic
Report a violation of the law

Topic summary

The discussion revolves around selecting a budget SSD for a system, specifically comparing the Crucial BX500 and Kingston A400, focusing on their NAND types (TLC vs. MLC). Users express concerns about the longevity and performance of TLC drives, with many recommending the BX500 for its better controller and overall performance. The consensus suggests that while 120GB is sufficient for Windows and light applications, opting for a 240GB SSD is advisable to avoid storage limitations. Users also discuss the reliability of SSDs compared to HDDs, noting that SSDs generally have a lower failure rate. The conversation highlights the importance of considering capacity and performance trade-offs when choosing a budget SSD.
Summary generated by the language model.
ADVERTISEMENT