[Solved] Copying Entrance Gate Remote Control: FloR FLO2R-S with Variable Key & PIC16F526 uC Inside

This is why rolling code remotes were introduced to avoid duplication and ensure safety.
It can be deceived, but it requires specialist knowledge and equipment.

Added after 1 [minutes]:

https://www.pilotydobram.pl/programowanie-pilota-do-bramy-osiedlowej

On the one hand, the rationing of pilots has its purpose - without it, a parking lot in a gated community (if there are no dedicated parking spaces) quickly turns into a guarded parking lot for the entire neighborhood.
On the other hand - my half has a golden mean - each apartment is assigned to: 2 remote controls, 2 RFid tablets (controlling the gates) and each apartment has a dedicated parking space (overwhelming individuals parking redundant cars on the sidewalks and blocking trips after a dozen or so tavern brawls quickly began to disappear).
But additional remote control is only possible after failure and replacement of the old one.

As for the remote copying from the link above - he does not COPY / CLONES the original, but only uses a clever remote adding procedure using an already working remote (from which he supposedly clones - just like you can add regular original remotes with already added ones). If this option is disabled in the control panel - you won't do anything with this "copy" or the original. In addition, it has the parameters of ALL systems in its database - which it can "copy" - and if it is to work with your Nice Flor - it must have that system in its database.

You can only "make extra" remote control by buying the same new (or replacement) and add it to the receiver - you must have physical access to the control panel (because remote access is usually blocked in housing estates) and possibly the receiver's security code (available from the one who rules)

NO. All commercially used microcontrollers have 100% hardware-locked reading (what would it be a business for the manufacturer, if instead of buying a remote, everyone would buy a PIC for PLN 5 and save it in a batch, realistically looking - even wanting to make such a remote yourself - taking into account the workload alone, the cost of parts and assembly - not counting the cost of the concept, research and design, some companies - e.g. Elmes with his pilots for PLN 35 - are approaching the edge of profitability).
And from your point of view (with the emphasis on copying the remote control without entering into agreements with the operator) - for a person with skills between a layman and an intermediate - making a copy of a rolling code remote that works with any specific system is not feasible.

If you study 4 years of higher mathematics with cryptology in the background, maybe ... and why maybe I wrote this a bit offensively - see the sticky topic: "How radio remotes work, why not every remote will work ..."

aj123 wrote:

Well, let's make an appointment; the cost of a new remote control on the Internet - PLN 50, the cost of receiving a program programmed by the owner - PLN 800. Perhaps a slight exaggeration?

Aiming to limit the number of unauthorized pilots - the estate manager has the right to do so and you will not jump over it, read the Regulations of the estate / community instead of writing that it is an exaggeration, and if you actually have a damaged remote that has been saved in the receiver, the costs will probably be lower, which more than once one of the administrators of the department (Marek J.) proved himself by contacting the given area administrator.

aj123 wrote:

I live in a housing estate where someone 'wise' has decided to put a barrier at the entrance and give one remote control to the apartment,

First of all, the fact that you write so does not mean that it is so. After all, you wrote yourself:

aj123 wrote:

that we are a capable nation, as the landowner predicted

How are we supposed to know that you are not a tenant of a neighboring facility and that you parked next to it "politely" because there was a place there and the "native" residents had nowhere to park? Nobody spends a few or a dozen thousand on a device limiting access for their own "whim" and without agreeing / consulting with the legal owners of the premises. Where were you then?
There are at least several ways to make the entry available to other buts this is not a hacking forum and I think no one should say how to "bypass the system" . Provide the name of the facility manager / administrator and the address / name of the estate and I will try to clarify the matter.
In addition, it seems to me that indefinite access to a closed parking lot in the center of Katowice for PLN 800 is an opportunity ...

shadow of darkness wrote:

it is very easy to add such a remote control

Well, my friend "flashed" ... It's like a fan watching a match on TV (and it was recorded almost a year and a half earlier) who thinks he is better than any of the players on the pitch. Since it's so simple, explain to the average Kowalski how to do it step by step without investing in equipment whose value "slightly" exceeds the cost of a new remote control with the service ... Well done!

Please describe how the remotes will behave (copied and the original used for cloning)? Will they work as they should, assuming that some will be used several times a day, others once a week, etc (emission counters ...)?

aj123 wrote:

Another thing is that a year ago, four experts on this topic theorized that it was unethical, impossible, etc.

Because it is - I think in the south you have a different concept of common ownership - when all the neighbors start to copy the remote controls, you will start a topic on how to get rid of them because you do not have a place to park. Just think how it works.

aj123 wrote:

Someone comes in and suddenly everything becomes simple.

Of course...

aj123 wrote:

Let the provision in the regulations serve as an example,

You were asked for something, you remained deaf

Marek J. wrote:

How are we supposed to know that you are not a tenant of a neighboring facility and that you parked next to it "politely" because there was a place there and the "native" residents had nowhere to park? Nobody spends a few or a dozen thousand on a device limiting access for their own "whim" and without agreeing / consulting with the legal owners of the premises. Where were you then?
There are at least a few ways to make the entry available to others, but this is not a hacking forum, and I don't think anyone should say how to "bypass the system". Provide the name of the facility manager / administrator and the address / name of the estate and I will try to clarify the matter.
In addition, it seems to me that indefinite access to a closed parking lot in the center of Katowice for PLN 800 is an opportunity ...

The fact that such possibilities exist has been known for a long time (it is enough to read a bit on the Internet ...).
I undertook further discussion not to play "hacker" but to show the unprofitability and incorrect operation of such a "solution"
First of all - the cost of the project
Second - time-consuming and copy-making skills
Third, incorrect operation.
Can you imagine that with a dozen or so clones, one will press the remote control 4 times, the second 20 and the third (after returning, e.g. from vacation, 150 times, standing at the gate ???

aj123 wrote:

From what I learned at Warsaw University of Technology, it is not a very expensive investment.
As for the correctness of operation - I have already mentioned that this is a compromise. Better to stand at the gate a minute and push than wait an hour for someone else to graciously open it.

Absurd

aj123 wrote:

The second thing is that the administrator of the estate ("Mr. President") is an idiot who threatens people with eviction for their crooked gaze. The last thing I want is for a stranger to tease him on my behalf.

This is what community meetings and elections are for to solve such problems, not the pointless idea of cloning a pilot, the use of which will become very tedious.