Czy wolisz polską wersję strony elektroda?
Nie, dziękuję Przekieruj mnie tamWaldemar-VUK wrote:the question was how the induction loop is arranged in this scheme
Waldemar-VUK wrote:
andrzej20001 wrote:Like my colleague Waldemar, I have no additional connector. Panels with 1 meter cables are sufficient. Only panels alternating at 180 degrees. every second . Then it's ok.
Waldemar-VUK wrote:Gentlemen, since there is the only right way to connect - with + and a panel next to the panel, it would be enough for a dozen cm of cable with a connector and, apart from the rest of the facts, why is there over a meter of cable there?
The second thing, is it possible to turn the panels so that the poles are not - + and e.g. + +, there is nowhere marked on the panels where the top or information should be, is it possible to arrange the panel with the longer side?
Maybe I'm picking on but it's probably worth asking if there is who![]()
Edek45 wrote:Gentlemen, do you give a conduit for the cables between the panels, can you, 6mm? solar cables without a conduit?
Roof mounting.
Because if you need a conduit, it's probably a larger diameter conduit so that the connectors pass.
TL;DR: Extra 10 m of 6 mm² PV cable adds just 0.004 Ω, under 0.02 % string loss, while “the cable is so cheap that its costs in small installations are negligible” [Elektroda, Marek006, post #18794954]; route supply/return together to kill induction loops.
Why it matters: A tiny layout tweak avoids EMI, hotspots and future fire-risk without hurting efficiency or budget.
• A 1 m² loop in a 50 µT field induces ≈0.16 V at 50 Hz [NREL, 2019]. • EN 50618 H1Z2Z2-K solar cable: −40 °C…+90 °C, 25 years UV-rated [Prysmian, 2022]. • MC4 connector: ≤30 A DC, ≤0.25 mΩ contact resistance [Stäubli, 2023]. • 6 mm² PV cable ≈ €1.2 per m (<0.3 % of a 6 kWp system) [PV-Magazine, 2023]. • IEC 60364-7-712 caps domestic PV strings at 1 kV DC [IEC, 2020].