Czy wolisz polską wersję strony elektroda?
Nie, dziękuję Przekieruj mnie tamjanuszzpolski007 wrote:Disconnects ?
januszzpolski007 wrote:Like actual range
januszzpolski007 wrote:how to mount the antenna?
januszzpolski007 wrote:ping, speed, power? etc. ?
kudlatyzero wrote:As for the IP, of course it is Polish
kudlatyzero wrote:I recommend this link
https://satellitemap.space/
kudlatyzero wrote:As for the number of satellites, I see a lot of them over Poland
kudlatyzero wrote:the entry point to the network is in Wola Krobowska.
kudlatyzero wrote:I have had this service for a long time and still have a Polish IP
Quote:tracert -d google.pl
Quote:tracert -d wp.pl
Quote:
NetRange: 149.19.108.0 - 149.19.109.255
CIDR: 149.19.108.0/23
NetName: SPACEX-STARLINK-IPV4-01
NetHandle: NET-149-19-108-0-1
Parent: NET149 (NET-149-0-0-0-0)
NetType: Direct Allocation
OriginAS: AS14593
Organization: SpaceX Services, Inc. (SS-2296)
RegDate: 2021-03-05
Updated: 2021-03-18
Ref: https://rdap.arin.net/registry/ip/149.19.108.0
OrgName: SpaceX Services, Inc.
OrgId: SS-2296
Address: 1 Rocket Rd
City: Hawthorne
StateProv:CA
PostalCode: 90250
Country: US
...
kudlatyzero wrote:
kudlatyzero wrote:My mobile reception is not the best.
matek451 wrote:200GB half a day, 400GB per day, 12TB per month - what are you doing on the Internet to generate so much traffic? For an ordinary user, Starlink is still unprofitable and too expensive. It won't make a career here because mobile operators work OK on LTE and the range is very good considering the conditions. Price is decisive.
KOCUREK1970 wrote:kudlatyzero wrote:When I go on holiday to Spain, I pack Starlink in a backpack and I still have my internet, that's an advantage.
Not so fast, you seem to have a location assigned to it.
kudlatyzero wrote:Well, let's be happy that my friend will pay more than ours. Today this information came out and it doesn't particularly help me. To tell you the truth, it's stupid behavior, first reduction from 500 to 230 and after 2 months, I think it's 335. It's not worth talking about.
kudlatyzero wrote:Today this information came out and it doesn't particularly help me. To tell you the truth, it's stupid behavior, first reduction from 500 to 230 and after 2 months, I think it's 335. It's not worth talking about.
kudlatyzero wrote:As I wrote earlier, such a company should not make such foolish decisions, lower prices and then raise the price after less than 2 months.