jozgaw wrote: Plumpi and what better protection do you see in 20-30-year-old and older blocks with an aluminum installation?
Certainly not the reset system.
First, we need to know:
1. What protection do we expect and what technical and financial means are we devoted to the implementation of the protection?
2. What installation are we dealing with, ie what type of protection was used when designing this installation?
3. What is its technical condition and is it possible to provide protection as originally designed?
4. Will the fault loop impedance provide effective protection?
5. Has the installation been modified, eg main risers have been replaced, has the main switchboard been earthed?
Only when you know the answers to all of the above questions, you can discuss what is better and advise in such a way as not to expose the author of the thread to more serious security.
ad.1
a) Zeroing by bridging the pin with zero is the cheapest solution, but it depends on many factors. First, it must comply with the current regulations or with the applicable regulations, according to which the installation was designed.
In order to comply with the applicable regulations, the wires to the socket should be replaced with larger ones, i.e. a minimum of 10mm2 for copper or a minimum of 16mm2 for aluminum. In practice, this involves breaking the walls and replacing the wires. In this case, it is wise and cheaper to lay a 3x2.5mm2 wire and make a standard TN-S or TN-CS system, i.e. with L (phase), N (formerly known as neutral) and PE (protective) conductors. Moreover, for such a zeroing to be certain, it was necessary to ensure perfect connections on the protective-neutral PEN conductor and remove all fuses on this conductor, and such fuses were very often installed in the blocks.
In order to perform the zeroing system in accordance with the regulations that were in force at the time when the installation was designed, it would have to be designed as a zeroing installation, i.e. it would have to be in other rooms and in the documentation of this building.
Moreover, it would be necessary to ensure perfect contact connections on the neutral wire and to make sure that there is no fuse on this wire anywhere.
b) Execution of an earthed equalizing circuit - connect all pins in the sockets in this apartment with all metal installations in this apartment and the TV installation. this is slightly more expensive than zeroing. however, contrary to appearances, it provides quite good protection at a relatively low cost, because the protective conductor can be led even outside, e.g. in strips, or fastened without strips with special pins with bands to the wall. This only requires an additional cable to be installed in the existing installation.
c) The most expensive, but the most effective protection in accordance with the applicable regulations.
It consists in replacing the cables with new 3-core cables throughout the premises and making a circuit with a PE protective conductor connected to a PEN conductor on a vertical basis. In addition, it would also be necessary to perform the equipotential bonding as described earlier.
ad. 2 and 3
If it is a 2-wire installation and has a fuseon the neutral conductor or burned out contacts in the rosettes on this conductor, it is absolutely forbidden to do zeroing, as it may be fatal. It is better to do nothing, because this voltage from the computer casing flows to the casing through the power supply filter capacitors and is not harmful to human health and life. In this situation, it would be necessary to return to point 1
If it is a system with zeroing and the conditions are met, that there is no fuse on the neutral wire, that the contacts in the rosettes are perfect, and that such an installation has been designed, zeroing can be performed.
ad. 4
Such measurements must be performed by a person with appropriate SEP qualifications for protective measurements.
This person will determine which type of protection can be performed and how effective it will be.
ad. 5
If the risers were modernized (and this is often the case in old buildings) and e.g. a 25mm2 or thicker cable was laid, the most reasonable solution would be to make an installation in accordance with applicable regulations, i.e. TN-S or TN-CS (point 1c) by adding an additional protective conductor by gently hammering it into the wall or leading it over the top, or by replacing all the wires, or by resetting it, keeping the principle that there can be no fuse on zero and bad contacts. And by the way, I would also add to the equalization of potentials.
So, as you can see, there is no perfect and universal answer to the above question.