logo elektroda
logo elektroda
X
logo elektroda

The preferred burning speed for Audio CDs

0rzech 84467 8
ADVERTISEMENT
Treść została przetłumaczona polish » english Zobacz oryginalną wersję tematu
  • #1 4362857
    0rzech
    Level 11  
    As in the subject matter, I wanted to ask what speed is the best. I have always heard that the smallest one guarantees trouble-free reading through a laser, e.g. in faith. The problem is that recently I found out that it is better to record at higher speed, so I wanted to ask people with more experience in this matter.

    thanks in advance for your answer,
    greetings
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #2 4362932
    tronic1
    IT specialist
    At higher speeds, you may have playback pops. You can check it yourself.
  • #3 4363174
    *mondzio*
    Level 30  
    I don't know if the others will agree with me
    best speed for cd audio burning
    is 16x and a maximum of 24x.
    I also use this speed for mp3 recording.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #4 4363231
    vcc
    Level 35  
    I also use a speed of 16X, and if I'm in a hurry, it's 24X and I also have no problem with playing CDs on the radio by myself.
  • #5 4363393
    marko_g
    Level 11  
    I honestly admit that I only heard the opinion that for Audio CD the slower the better ... I once talked about this with a guy who has been selling audio equipment for years, but one for audiophiles, audio discs recorded in a variety of ways. So when I'm not in a rush, I fire 4x and haven't noticed any problems yet. Even my Dior CD player from the early 90's can read these audio CDs to me.
    So the choice is yours :)
    Regards
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #6 4364143
    dzojstik
    Level 13  
    I definitely record audio tiles at x4 speeds. At higher speeds, I missed what I called "sound dynamics" for my own use - the sound was correct, but I lacked a certain depth.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #7 4364492
    DriverMSG
    Admin of Computers group
    I found out in older AUDIO equipment that it didn't even read CDs recorded faster than x4, so in my opinion the slower the better.
    And it is also important what quality these tiles are.
  • #8 4364496
    WojtasJD
    Level 43  
    Quote:
    Does using lower CD-R recording speeds and lower capacity media produce better sounding discs?
    High speed CD-R writing often creates discs with low I3 and I11 signal amplitudes (optical signals generated from the smallest and largest marks) and 80 minute discs achieve their capacity by packing marks and lands more tightly together. These result in reduced recording and playing margins and sometimes lead to perceptible sound degradation, especially in older CD audio players which may not employ equalization (signal boosting). Consequently, many high speed recorder manufacturers recommend creating audio discs at reduced writing speeds while some recorders even limit their maximum speed to 24x when writing audio discs. In addition to slower recording speeds, some manufacturers also suggest using 74 minute instead of 80 minute discs. Several of the latest recorders even offer special writing modes which record audio discs with longer marks and lands than would normally be the case, albeit at the expense of some capacity. For example, an 80 minute disc written with longer marks and lands might only hold 74 minutes of audio and a 74 minute disc just 68 minutes of material.


    http://www.osta.org/technology/cdqa8.htm
    (OSTA -> Optical Storage Technology Association)
  • #9 4364558
    dexi
    Level 29  
    If you have an older player then you can apply the principle "the slower the better". But who expected players to read CD-RW (recorded as audio) or MP3, or that players would have an anti-shock buffer? So in the new players you won't have any problems if you record even at 52x speed. However, it all depends on what you want to play it in. Sometimes recording at 4x speed can only be a waste of time, because many players have drives that are as efficient as computer drives (though maybe I exaggerated a bit here).

    It also depends on how you make the CD, whether you use OverBurning, or whether you don't end the session. You need to know what you can afford on your player.

    As for audiophiles: what has gingerbread for a windmill. All data on the CD is in digital form. If he wants to have good quality on the disc, recording as slowly as possible, let him record a vinyl disc, because speed matters there ;-) . The most important for me (and I consider myself an audiophile) is the quality of the playback drive and the playback system (Hi-Fi).

Topic summary

The discussion centers around the optimal burning speed for Audio CDs. Users express varying opinions, with many suggesting that slower speeds, such as 4x or 16x, yield better playback quality and compatibility with older audio equipment. Some participants report that higher speeds, like 24x or even 52x, can be used without issues on modern players, which often have advanced error correction and anti-shock features. The consensus leans towards slower speeds for audiophile-grade quality, while acknowledging that modern devices can handle faster burns without significant problems. The quality of the media used is also highlighted as a crucial factor in playback performance.
Summary generated by the language model.
ADVERTISEMENT