spinkamidi wrote: As for the buffer, the estimated time of maintaining heat in winter periods would be about 12 hours
With such requirements, it probably makes no sense to pack in a buffer, because by loading the furnace with coal (in my case, kwkd15), in severe frosts, I have peace of mind for a minimum of 12 hours. The surface is similar, but the house is old, pre-war and uninsulated. At the current temperature, full charge is sufficient for 24 hours
Raising the temperature of 1000 liters of water by 60 degrees (assumption: we heat from 30 to 90)
it is about 251 Mj of energy, equal to about 70kwh
Let us assume that the calorific value of coal is 25MJ / kg, so 10 kg of coal is needed to charge such a buffer.
In fact, more is needed because I do not take into account the losses and efficiency of the boiler
let's assume that for heating you need a continuous power of 4kw, such a buffer will be enough for 17.5 hours.
In my opinion, if you play with the buffer, let it have at least 3000 liters, then it will be enough for over two days, then you can buy, for example, a wood gasifying stove.
With a small buffer capacity, it is not profitable to pack it because the costs and complexity of the system increase significantly and the energy in it is as much as in a full coal carbonator
And there is nothing to be delighted with modernity, because the current boiler rooms, installers can stuff them with various pumps, valves, blowers, controllers, etc., with later only this problem is because the user does not know what it is for, there are more elements to break down and the pumps consume energy - the pump 40W, if he works still about PLN 15 per month, not much, but when there are 3 such pumps and the electricity bill is every 2 months, we already have almost PLN 100 on the bill more