I'm reading and reading and wondering why you don't replace the entire engine right away - it will be less work than messing around with dismantling and replacing the chain!
It's not really my car, do what you want. For me, it's idiotic to pull the engine out and replace the entire timing belt just because the tensioner is most likely damaged. Because these tensioners, unfortunately, break down - the rule is that when the engine is running, the tensioner should stretch the chain, and after turning off the engine it should remain in this position. However, if it goes back, at the next start we have a characteristic rattling until the tensioner comes out again under the influence of oil pressure.
szymitsu21 wrote: These chains sometimes broke after 150,000km.
You practice demagogy buddy :-/ If you live the engine and do not care about the service, you will destroy the timing even faster. And the results of this is? Because according to my knowledge, the timing system is not as emergency in these engines as you suggest. The mileage of 150,000 is a sign to check the wear of the chain - and not immediately throw yourself at replacing the entire timing chain. Because the chain is not a belt, and there is no need to replace it after a certain mileage!
Don't you think that if the timing belt was excessively worn, the chain would keep pounding against the housing?
Anyway, as I said: do what you want. I really like following the adventures of such "exchangers". Instead of doing any (even basic) diagnostics, they immediately start replacing half of the car. Money spent, time wasted, a whole shelf of unnecessary parts in the garage, and the car doesn't drive if it didn't

Of course, in this case, if you replace the entire timing belt (and don't forget about the tensioner!), the noise will disappear. But is this the method??