logo elektroda
logo elektroda
X
logo elektroda

Router Recommendations for Large House: TP-LINK AC1750 Archer C7 vs TP-LINK Archer C1200?

sebonieb 47061 36
ADVERTISEMENT
Treść została przetłumaczona polish » english Zobacz oryginalną wersję tematu
  • #31 16600821
    sebonieb
    Level 9  
    I have already updated the router software before, and I updated the drivers for the cards in one and the other were up-to-date, but after the update in one, the results were still low as I scanned as an iperf server.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #32 16601292
    bogiebog
    Level 43  
    Test (iperf.exe) this slow laptop with another WIFI router.

    Try to upload the reins of the card / chip manufacturer instead of the laptop manufacturer.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #33 16601434
    Gatki
    Level 12  
    sebonieb wrote:
    I have already updated the router software before, and I updated the drivers for the cards in one and the other were up-to-date, but after the update in one, the results were still low as I scanned as an iperf server.


    Hello, here you have FW with new rudders for radics and generally the best unoficial FW.
    https://www.asuswebstorage.com/navigate/s/AC9B06E9453F4D0CBD3D4AA26D5F37C9Y

    Suggested or even necessary NVRAM reset.
  • #34 16888940
    vonmlody
    Level 10  
    I will raise a bit of a topic with a slightly different problem on the same topic.

    I have a two-story house, in each room an ethernet socket, in the passage between the garage and the house there are 24 fields, a wifi router is connected to it. A sector antenna is connected to the router under the suspended ceiling in the central part of the house. Cables led out to the attic to the second router (some old edimaxy) and again the sector. This upper sector indicator does not exist because it is above the vapor-permeable foil that works like a screen.

    Therefore, at the top, I put a router in AP mode in one of the rooms with a shift of 5 channels.

    Xbox one connected via Ethernet, I sit with my laptop 2 meters from the sector block in the ceiling and try to stream X while the kids watch cartoons on TV. Quality tragic, interrupting, etc. After the cable to the stationary in the office works great.

    I come to the point. I'd like to improve reliability and wifi transfers

    1. Put a new router somewhere and ignore the archaic edimaxes and sector sectors? (at the moment I have -58dB on the lap) can I replace the router with an external antenna output, or something else?

    2. Is it normal that the devices do not switch to the stronger wifi when going from the bottom to the top? I use the wifi analyzer app and I can see when it connects to which network. It only switches when the wifi is turned off for a moment or when the signal disappears at all.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #35 16889007
    Anonymous
    Level 1  
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #36 17999827
    piotrek2555
    Level 10  
    Mikrotik RouterBoard is the best.
    rb962, rb951ui-2Hnd, rb2011 with wifi. All the mikrotics that have "H" in them are good. High power. // Message for posterity.
  • #37 18000106
    m.jastrzebski
    Network and Internet specialist
    piotrek2555 wrote:
    Mikrotik RouterBoard is the best.
    rb962, rb951ui-2Hnd, rb2011 with wifi. All the mikrotics that have "H" in them are good. High power. // Message for posterity.

    Bzudra on wheels.
    Exceeding the statutory power by mikrotika does not improve the transmission speed, indeed, in a closed room it even worsens it! This power can come in handy when you want to illegally establish a P2P connection in an open space.
    I once tested WiFi with MT with different powers. In difficult conditions (behind 2-3 walls) it worked best with power even below 100mW. Dialing 320 (or as much as the card could) gave lower speeds. The transmission is two-way and the telephone or computer will not transmit 300mW. You've tried it with high power and you paste it everywhere. And than WiFi mikrotika indoors, some market routers are doing better, unfortunately :-( For example, it is terribly lame with Samsung cells - with a perfect signal, the connection with the highest theoretically available speed will not be combined there. Let go already. The company is good, routers with great possibilities, such as the price, but WiFI is just 4 letters.

Topic summary

The discussion revolves around selecting a suitable router for a large house, specifically comparing the TP-LINK AC1750 Archer C7 and the TP-LINK Archer C1200. Users express concerns about WiFi range and speed, particularly when the router is located in the attic. Recommendations include using a main router with additional access points or WiFi extenders to improve coverage across multiple floors. Some participants suggest that physical obstructions and interference can significantly affect performance, and emphasize the importance of proper network setup. The Asus RT-AC1200G+ is also mentioned as a potential alternative, with users discussing issues related to speed drops and stability. Overall, the consensus is that while both TP-LINK models have their merits, a more robust solution involving multiple access points or wired connections may be necessary for optimal performance in larger homes.
Summary generated by the language model.
ADVERTISEMENT