Treating the panels as a "generator", read the determinant of the power of the installation,
it is, to put it mildly, to the detriment of the prosumer.
In order to optimize, the power of the panels is oversized in relation to the inverter
e.g.
https://www.fiff.pl/moc-instalacji-pv-a-moc-falownikow-fronius/ it is technically and economically justifiable.
Often, through this approach, you need to increase the power on the contract and this is a helmet for PGE.
Does anyone know why they consider the power of the panels to be the power of the generator and not the power of the inverter ??
It is a bit as if for a hydroelectric plant they told to give the power of the river, not the generator,
or, for a biogas plant, hectares of green crops and the amount of slurry.
This whole PV situation is not a monopoly by chance?
The goal of killing the little ones from PV, and when there will be a catastrophe with EU penalties, get a paw for money from fornication and build your own PV.
BE will become owners of large PV farms for free and windmills will be back in favor with BE.
A good BE will save us from EU penalties.
And we will finance it from taxes.
And the harlot will not lose the vat for electricity that we collect from BE and we do not produce for our own use.