Satellite Integration & IP Cameras: Zone Violation Alerts, ETHM LAN Connection & SD Card Recording

ciubers wrote:

I want to set up monitoring on IP cameras that will record on SD cards without an external recorder.

ciubers wrote:

Is it possible for the camera to "inform" the integre about the zone violation via LAN?

ciubers wrote:

I know that there are recorders with alarm outputs,

kood wrote:

OK, the other way around, I understood, that is, you need to leave, not enter, the rest of what I wrote is upholding.

sosarek wrote:

The recorder can record after motion detection, line crossing, etc.
Cameras will not replace external sensors and relying only on them is pointless.

ciubers wrote:

Please do not convince me to the recorder, I know that it has its advantages

ciubers wrote:

If it cannot be combined, it is difficult

ciubers wrote:

ETHM has an open protocol and can be integrated with other systems. It's just a matter of writing a short software and it could work.

dariusz.bembenek wrote:

On the integration itself: true, there is an integration protocol available on the Satellite side. It enables system control and, more generally, full management.
You should write a TCP client (we are talking about your own apps), because ETHM-1 will act as a server here.

Of course, instead of writing a program, you can simply insert a ready frame into ethm, which, for example, will turn on the control panel output and then this output will violate the input internally (the protocol does not allow for input violation). So writing a program or any code is not necessary, as long as the camera has the ability to send a frame to a specific IP address and port when an event occurs. Such a possibility is offered, for example, by HomeCenter2 from Fibaro.
And is there a camera on the market (at a good price) that does something like that? I don't know, personally I don't.

SMDmaniak wrote:

Hello

SATEL intercom module

greet

alster1 wrote:

Only that it has been heard practically since TSI appeared, and from what I understood, the author is looking for a solution for now, not in the unknown future.

ciubers wrote:

After entering the password from the keypad and generating the frame, everything works great. Now it's just a matter of finding a camera that can do it and the solution is ready.

IGS wrote:

ciubers wrote:

After entering the password from the keypad and generating the frame, everything works great. Now it's just a matter of finding a camera that can do it and the solution is ready.

Hi
1. I think that your expectations will be better realized by the recestrator in the appropriate version with the appropriate number of entries and exits, it will be more economical and more reliable (cards wear out)
2. The characteristics of the cameras you are looking for for Darek's idea have ACTI cameras, for sure I had a few years ago, I do not think it will change because the manufacturer emphasized this functionality. Cameras send and execute commands "from http"

ciubers wrote:

It is a bit strange that so many manufacturers offer such cameras and the system is underdeveloped.

ciubers wrote:

and ultimately, alarm monitoring and the LAN network is to have an independent power supply from a "small photovoltaic", so it is also about power consumption.

ciubers wrote:

Ultimately, alarm monitoring and the LAN network is to have an independent power supply from "small photovoltaics", so it is also about power consumption.

kood wrote:

ciubers wrote:

It is a bit strange that so many manufacturers offer such cameras and the system is underdeveloped.

SD cards are not just extra, and motion detection in cameras works so-so.

ciubers wrote:

and ultimately, alarm monitoring and the LAN network is to have an independent power supply from a "small photovoltaic", so it is also about power consumption.

Do you want to power the alarm from photovoltaics?