Elektroda.com
Elektroda.com
X
This content has been translated flag-pl » flag-en View the original version here.
  • #31
    kkkamil
    Level 13  
    What do you think about connecting lines with crimp ferrules? And then, of course, the thermo tube. It is about connecting both 230V and low voltage cables - e.g. temperature sensors.

    Best regards.
  • #32
    SylwekK
    Level 32  
    spec220 wrote:
    To be honest, this is the first time I have met on the forum a person who welds the installation at home, and for the first time someone who saves time and money on renovation in their OWN HOME

    Buddy, you're twisting the meaning of my speech a little. You still do not accept that the welded connection is reliable, because you simply did not do it and you DO NOT KNOW (not only you) how it should be done correctly ... As I wrote in my father, for 40 years even the light bulb did not flash due to "backlash". This is not the first time someone who does differently does not acknowledge that there are other faster and more efficient installation methods, and at the same time do not write to me about saving, because I have already improved economical installations and to this day they are grateful to me for it, because after other electricians who repaired by traditional methods, the problem returned after a month or so while baking pancakes :)
    I don't have to prove to you that the welded connection is the safest. There is NO chance of sparking a connection that will not be fully provided by a cube, twisted pair or even ordinary soldering if the tin melts under the influence of temperature, and I have already encountered something like this (probably this is what your spring is for, which is to protect against it). Can there be anything better in this situation for conductivity in a given material than permanent contact of two identical materials over a relatively large surface? If you say that it may be otherwise, take the measurements yourself and see for yourself :)
    Aaaa, and you have never seen something like this in installations, because you just rotate in other circles :)
    I will have a moment, maybe I will insert a short video on how this connection is properly made.
  • #33
    Anonymous
    Level 1  
  • #34
    clubber84
    Level 33  
    But buddy @ spec220 , no additional filler is used for welding, only two twisted copper wires are fused together along the entire length of the "twisted pair", not the end itself.
  • #35
    Anonymous
    Level 1  
  • #36
    miroslaw wielki
    Conditionally unlocked
    You can also weld with a laser.
  • #37
    pawel1148
    Level 23  
    kkkamil wrote:
    What do you think about connecting lines with crimp ferrules? And then, of course, the thermo tube. It is about connecting both 230V and low voltage cables - e.g. temperature sensors.

    I really don't like the use of crimp ferrules. WAGO prefers to connect lines. There is too much fun with the sleeves, then the effect is usually weak and I have to do it all over again. Maybe I'm doing something wrong. I do not know. I do not trust 2 wires in 1 sleeve (most often it does not withstand a tear test). I try to avoid connecting wires like fire.

    I sometimes use crimp sleeves to connect the cord to various types of devices with various clamps. And here comes my question.
    What methods do you use to connect the cable to e.g. a relay?
    I am happy when I only have a line in the signal wires, then I can allow myself to tin-plated and not use sleeves, to which I am a bit allergic (because to do it well, it takes me 3 times longer than tinning). And then it turns out that the clamp of the apparatus is not adapted to accept the sleeve.

    Second question: How do you handle the connection of, for example, 3 wires in the switchgear?
    WAGO seems to be the answer to how to do it at a reasonable price and form, but I have seen few such boxes. In addition, WAGO is only suitable for small cross sections. At higher currents, there are ZUGs, but I have never seen someone in the box on them somehow cleverly solved the connection of, for example, 3 wires with higher cross-sections. These flat connectors are quite often used on fuses, but the wires are not always separated here.
  • #38
    Anonymous
    Level 1  
  • #39
    Grzegorz_madera
    Level 37  
    pawel1148 wrote:
    then I can allow myself to tin-plated and not to use sleeves, to which I am a bit allergic (because to do it well, it takes me 3 times longer than tinning

    And I did exactly the opposite. I used to tin tips, now I have switched to sleeves. I have a press that clamps into a hexagon and no problem. And the robot goes 3 times faster than soldering. Good tin also costs its own, and the sleeves are cheaper. For example, for 1.5 mm? I pay 2.8 PLN / 100 pcs.
  • #40
    metalMANiu
    Level 20  
    pawel1148 wrote:
    In addition, WAGO is only suitable for small cross sections. At higher currents, there are ZUGs, but I have never seen someone in the box on them somehow cleverly solved the connection of, for example, 3 wires with higher cross-sections.

    They are WAGO with a lever version up to 6mm2 and current up to 32A. Not much change compared to 4mm2, but still.
    If you are a pedant, there are DIN rail mounts in which you put WAGO (but only those up to 4mm2).
  • #41
    miroslaw wielki
    Conditionally unlocked
    Finish this topic now, because it no longer leads to anything but an ego-raising towards others.
  • #42
    Piotrek#G
    Level 27  
    metalMANiu wrote:
    They are WAGO with a lever version up to 6mm2 and current up to 32A. Not much change compared to 4mm2, but still.
    If you are a pedant, there are DIN rail mounts in which you put WAGO (but only those up to 4mm2).

    After all, there are Wago connectors designed for direct mounting on a DIN rail, up to 35mm? and with a current of 85A.
  • #43
    metalMANiu
    Level 20  
    Piotrek#G wrote:
    metalMANiu wrote:
    They are WAGO with a lever version up to 6mm2 and current up to 32A. Not much change compared to 4mm2, but still.
    If you are a pedant, there are DIN rail mounts in which you put WAGO (but only those up to 4mm2).

    After all, there are Wago connectors designed for direct mounting on a DIN rail, up to 35mm? and with a current of 85A.


    Sure, but we talked about WAGO with a lever.
  • #45
    alfazulu
    Level 8  
    I do not use any cubes and other inventions. Simple twisted pair and insulation meet all the requirements
  • #46
    kotbury
    Gantry automation specialist
    I'm for. Wago may be simple to apply, but it takes up a lot of space (someone try to fit 4 Wago connectors connecting 4 cables by 4 wires in a standard flush-mounted box), besides, it is a flexible connector - susceptible to loosening.
  • #47
    miroslaw wielki
    Conditionally unlocked
    Now sometimes the strands are pushed with a hammer with a handle. I solder the strands.
  • #48
    Piotrek#G
    Level 27  
    kotbury wrote:
    Besides, it is a flexible joint - susceptible to loosening.

    Probably the elastic connection is more resistant to loosening. The spring ensures constant pressure all the time, compensating for any looseness that may result from various reasons.
  • #49
    alfazulu
    Level 8  
    Good soldering also meets the requirements, but I still prefer the so-called fishing twisted pair, it will break or loosen only when short-circuited
  • #50
    SylwekK
    Level 32  
    alfazulu wrote:
    it will not break or loosen until a short circuit occurs

    Well, the welded one will not loosen even with vibration, let alone short circuit :)
  • #51
    alfazulu
    Level 8  
    maybe that's right, but so far I have not seen a welded installation, I will stay with my twisted pair, for example, such insulation for insulation / fishing knot / passes the exam and failure-free