logo elektroda
logo elektroda
X
logo elektroda

Evaluating Safety: Living Near GSM Transmitters (LTE 1800, UMTS 900) - 500m vs 1km Distances

buka93 26127 10
ADVERTISEMENT
Treść została przetłumaczona polish » english Zobacz oryginalną wersję tematu
  • #1 18390158
    buka93
    Level 2  
    Hello. I have the opportunity to buy a building plot (small town) within 500 m from the gsm transmitter (lte 1800, umts 900) and almost 1 km from the other (gsm 900, UMTS 2100, lte 800, gsm 1800, lte 2600 - names taken from the mapabts website at exactly these transmitters). My question, is such a distance from the place of residence safe? Is it worth taking some measurements in connection with possible radiation? Thanks in advance for your answers.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #2 18390205
    matek451
    Level 43  
    I live 300-500 meters from two base stations, one is Networks and the other is Play with Plus hanging on it and I don't see any problems because of that, except that thanks to this I have the perfect range of all operators, which is a big plus.
    Helpful post? Buy me a coffee.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #3 18390249
    buka93
    Level 2  
    I understand, and you have not wondered / did not know whether such a distance may have a negative impact on health?
  • #5 18390305
    buka93
    Level 2  
    Sure, I use it, but I have contact with it several times during the day, if I don't have to, I don't use it. And you spend most of the day at home, hence my question.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #6 18390323
    matek451
    Level 43  
    And where are you on the phone? It logs into base stations all the time when it is turned on. Do you use WiFi at home? The electromagnetic field is an indispensable part of our lives. The fear of it is unjustified, there are no unambiguous studies that would confirm the harmful effects of EMF in the 800-2600MHz range on our health.
    Helpful post? Buy me a coffee.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #7 18390530
    IC_Current
    Network and Internet specialist
    I sometimes go west of the Oder. Do you know where operators often install transmitters? On school buildings. Yes, you read the SCHOOLS right. Do you know why? I also asked - because these buildings often have a good location in the middle of housing estates (cities) or are slightly higher than the houses in the area (villages). In addition, the school gains a steady income, and the operator does not have to put up the mast and occupy the area. What is most interesting, these masts have been standing there for many years and the radiation standards are several times higher, and so far somehow nothing happened to the children. It is unthinkable for us. Imagine the same with us - what a rush would be, probably TVN and TVP would have something to cry over for a year.
    Although I personally think that the best are transmitters (or femtocells) placed on the roofs of buildings (blocks, businesses, churches) and cleverly disguised. Nobody sees such a transmitter (and often does not even know about it) and when they do not see it, they do not feel any "ailments".
    Helpful post? Buy me a coffee.
  • #8 18390593
    Anonymous
    Level 1  
  • #9 18390996
    m.jastrzebski
    Network and Internet specialist
    buka93 wrote:
    Hello. I have the opportunity to buy a building plot (small town) within 500 m from the gsm transmitter (lte 1800, umts 900) and almost 1 km from the other (gsm 900, UMTS 2100, lte 800, gsm 1800, lte 2600 - names taken from the mapabts website at exactly these transmitters). My question, is such a distance from the place of residence safe? Is it worth taking some measurements in connection with possible radiation? Thanks in advance for your answers.

    You seem to have asked the wrong question.
    Even 50m from the transmitter, the EM radiation standards will not be exceeded. So what to say about 500m.
    What would you like to compare the "measurements" made 500m from the transmitter? To the standards in force in the country? Because if you don't believe the standards are safe then the question should be what radial EM levels are safe. Only then do we enter the muddy ground of conspiracy theories, and this is not a forum.
  • #10 19317680
    topik100
    Level 1  
    Gentlemen,

    I'll dig up the topic a bit. What would you say for an apartment, including small children, in a block 25-30m from BTS, more or less at its height. It is true that the antenna is not aimed centrally at the apartment, but its azimuth barely deviates from the edge of the building at a distance of just about 30m. I enclose a photo of the station.
    Evaluating Safety: Living Near GSM Transmitters (LTE 1800, UMTS 900) - 500m vs 1km Distances


    I would like to add that a few years ago the standard was exceeded (VIEP survey) and the operator "after the correction of the installation parameters, sent the results of the measurements carried out to VIEP". Only now the standards have changed. I do not know each other and I am curious about your opinion whether this is a cause for concern.
    Moderated By jimasek:


    3.1.19. Do not send messages on archival topics if this is another question, in particular other than the questioning person. Out of respect for the questioner, create your own topic. You can only add a solution to the problem.

  • #11 19317919
    Anonymous
    Level 1  

Topic summary

The discussion revolves around the safety of living near GSM transmitters, specifically at distances of 500 meters and 1 kilometer. Users share personal experiences, noting that living close to base stations has not resulted in health issues, and they emphasize the importance of mobile connectivity. Concerns about electromagnetic fields (EMF) and their potential health impacts are raised, with some participants arguing that existing studies do not conclusively prove harmful effects from EMF in the frequency range of 800-2600 MHz. The conversation also touches on the placement of transmitters on school buildings and the historical context of radiation standards. A user inquires about the safety of living 25-30 meters from a base station, highlighting previous exceedances of radiation standards and seeking opinions on current safety measures.
Summary generated by the language model.
ADVERTISEMENT