IC_Current wrote:
The range of the high-speed WiFi network is up to one wall. The range of the latest AX solutions is practically one room. The rest of the range is old and overloaded 2.4GHz networks, and there you will get at most a dozen or so Mbps.
The house will have 60m2 per level, 12cm ytong partition walls, 16cm reinforced concrete ceiling.
One AP not enough? Now in my apartment I have a Mikrotik RBD52G hAP ac2 router with internal antennas and it covers the whole apartment without any problems in 5Ghz. It's more or less in the center of the apartment.
And so he plans to connect the main devices (PC, TV) via Ethernet.
Wifi is basically just phones, Smart Home.
IC_Current wrote:
If you put a separate cable for each socket, it doesn't matter whether it will be SAT or DVB-T. You simply connect the cable from the socket to the appropriate antenna in the cabinet in the utility room. I now do it so that I run three wires from the SAT antenna to the patch cabinet and one wire from the terrestrial one. Mounts the 1xSCR+2xFB converter. Then I only send the SCR signal to the main decoder and the FB signal to the multiroom decoders, and if there is no multiroom or SAT at all, I just give the splitter and connect the signal from the terrestrial antenna. All on one wiring.
The SAT antenna will be on the ground, 6x antenna cables will go from it to the utility room. In the utility room there will be cables to individual rooms (2x living room, 1x in each room). In general, I do SAT only because there is no fiber on the plot. If it was, I would go to IPTV. And IPTV and access to the LTE network are a known failure.
Now I'm at the cable stage. Converters etc. will be a topic in about 6-8 months. There are plans for a SAT decoder in the living room, a second decoder (multiroom) in one of the rooms, and only terrestrial on other sockets - if you manage to get it.
As for DVB-T / DVB-T2, this is a big problem with coverage and I don't know what to do

The emitter map shows this:
For the location:
MUX1: Possibly no coverage with a typical TV antenna
MUX2: Possibly no coverage with a typical TV antenna
MUX3: Crested
MUX8: Crested
DVB-T2 TVP test: Grzywacz
DVB-T2 TVN test: Possibly no coverage with a typical TV antenna
Added after 3 [minutes]: _cheetah_ wrote:
On the other hand, if an external LTE modem integrated with antennas, i.e. the so-called CPE, is used, it is connected to the router / internal LAN network with a twisted pair cable and there is generally no problem here. It is only worth using an external twisted pair with gel (water protection). Cat. 5e.
Here, due to the length of the cables (15m), I will go for the CPE solution.
Here's a question - do you have to look at these antennas often? It will be at a height of about 6-7m with access only from a ladder :(
Unless it will be installed at about 4-4.5 m on the railing next to the window, then access would be after opening the window. The distance to the transmitters is about 2.5-3 km. Nothing blocks the view.
_cheetah_ wrote:
From SAT, it is good to run at least two coaxial cables (black, if from Al, then with gel), from DVB-T one cable is usually enough (the same as for SAT). The installation location of the DVB-T antenna is subject to similar restrictions as in the case of LTE. How good it is, it can be anywhere, how bad it is with signals, not necessarily.
With both LTE and DVB-T, the general rule should be that the higher the antenna, the better the signals. But unfortunately, that's not always the case. Remember that a mast over 3m is subject to notification.
SAT and the DVB-T problem I described above