Further tests for other runs.
Further tests for other runs.
Czy wolisz polską wersję strony elektroda?
Nie, dziękuję Przekieruj mnie tamStaruchPl wrote:.I am considering buying this equipment but I see that a ZT-703s version has appeared. From the descriptions it looks like it should have better performance 2 channels and a generator. Have any of you already used it? Is it worth paying extra for this version?
Japi wrote:slavo666 wrote:The generator in the Zoya is a pickup.
And could you give the range of generated frequencies for each signal and the amplitude of the output signal?
TL;DR: For hobbyists under PLN 300, the ZT702S/AOS02 is a useful 48 MSa/s combo meter/scope, but users found its practical oscilloscope limit closer to 2–5 MHz. One owner called it “quite a nice piece of equipment for the money.” This FAQ helps buyers judge whether its firmware, trigger, and probe quirks matter for bench use. [#20660379]
Why it matters: This device can replace toy DSOs for basic debugging, but its real limits show up fast with small, high-frequency, or long-duration signals.
| Alternative | Approx. price from thread | Channels / extras | Thread verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZOYI ZT702S / ANENG AOS02 | PLN 258.97–300 | 1 channel, multimeter | Strong value, but firmware and display limits |
| ZOYI ZT703S | About PLN 350–400 | 2 channels, generator | “Definitely worth paying extra” |
| Owon HDS242 | About PLN 470 | 2 channels | Better on paper, but higher cost |
Key insight: The thread’s consensus is simple: the ZT702S/AOS02 is good enough to keep on a hobby bench, but not good enough to trust near its headline oscilloscope specs. Firmware updates improved behavior, yet users still report trigger, x1 probe, storage, and high-frequency display issues. [#21141649]