logo elektroda
logo elektroda
X
logo elektroda

How do you switch a wall lamp on a different circuit without changing the switch?

ryszardwjedrusik 225 10
ADVERTISEMENT
Treść została przetłumaczona polish » english Zobacz oryginalną wersję tematu
  • #1 21425471
    ryszardwjedrusik
    Level 2  
    Hi
    I would be grateful for help in designing a switch for a wall lamp that is on a different circuit from the switch. The switch is an ordinary wall mounted key switch - I cannot change it to another. I am attaching a diagram of the installation. I would like it to be a simple (cheap) solution without batteries in the controls (230 V supply), I don't need additional control from e.g. remote controls, phone.
    Regards
    Richard

    Hand-drawn electrical schematic showing connections of two circuits with a switch and a wall lamp. .
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #2 21425501
    bratHanki
    Level 38  
    The simplest, cheapest and safest way to do this is with an additional switch in the wall lamp, the so-called "dangle". Other methods are not so simple/expensive. Additional information is needed. Will there be another light source from this switch or just the wall lamp?
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #3 21425553
    ryszardwjedrusik
    Level 2  
    Thank you for your reply, the dangle is out - my wife will not accept :-) , the switch will only be used for this wall lamp. As for the price, I am able to spend 100 max 200 zł.
  • #4 21425582
    David_Serum
    Level 21  
    >>21425471 .

    There are also options for battery-free switches with a relay, but I personally do not have good experience. Terribly susceptible to interference from mains or RF. I have had lights go on just like that, even at night.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #5 21425593
    mgim
    VIP Meritorious for electroda.pl
    David_Serum wrote:
    ......... but I personally do not have a good experience. Terribly susceptible to interference from the network or RF........
    .
    Me neither. And if there is a BTS nearby - it will be a disco. I was setting up at a colleague's house in the cabinet backlights (kitchen) - he bought it himself, I resisted - he wanted it, he got it. After two days he asked how to dismantle it. I put on a "string". He had to accept.
  • #6 21425646
    David_Serum
    Level 21  
    >>21425593 .

    I just live a few dozen metres from such a transmitter, I even gave up the doorbell because it was also radio-controlled, plugged into the socket. At night, one would wake up, look through the peephole in the door and there was nothing there. I took the battery out of the transmitter to prove to my wife that it was the receiver that was failing and yes, I'm finally going to connect up the normal model 😆.
  • #7 21425696
    bratHanki
    Level 38  
    ryszardwjedrusik wrote:
    the switch will only be used for this wall lamp.
    .
    In that case, controlling the light from another source falls out. Probably also falls out of forging in the walls and finding something ready-made immune to interference. In the old Elektronik Hobby or New Elektronik there was a circuit for sending sound over the 230V system. The way it worked was that there was a generator, probably 220 kHz modulated, e.g. with speech, and this was sent into the network. On the other side was a receiver, detector and audio amplifier. This worked within one phase independently of the circuitry. In this case, the receiver should be fitted with a relay or triac.
    Something along the lines of an inernet network transmitter.
  • #8 21425717
    ryszardwjedrusik
    Level 2  
    >>21425646 .
    I did some research on the web and found a ZAMEL solution: transmitter: RNP-01 and receiver: ROP-01, only I will probably have to change the switch from a bistable switch to a monostable button - unless it will work on a bistable one? Does anyone have experience of such an arrangement, how will it resist interference?
  • #9 21425740
    Polon_us
    Level 42  
    Just for myself - in the box of this sconce switch, the colleague has both L and N lines?
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #10 21425778
    mgim
    VIP Meritorious for electroda.pl
    David_Serum wrote:
    ....... plugged into the socket. At night a person would wake up, look through the peephole in the door and there was emptiness..........

    Could have moved the bed into the hallway :-) . I know of a case where WiFi was even "boilerplate" near the BTS - and the WiFi repeater would just switch on and off.
  • #11 21426830
    robbel
    Level 9  
    >>21425717 .
    I've done lighting and roller shutter controls on Zamel's ExTA Free controllers, they've been working without problems for a nice few years. Indeed, I have done on monostable switches.

Topic summary

The discussion addresses the challenge of switching a wall lamp connected to a different electrical circuit without replacing the existing ordinary wall-mounted key switch. The preferred solution must be simple, cost-effective (under 200 zł), and operate on a 230 V supply without batteries or remote control features. The simplest recommendation is adding a local switch ("dangle") at the lamp, but this was rejected for aesthetic reasons. Battery-free wireless switches with relays were considered but found unreliable due to susceptibility to mains and RF interference, especially near BTS transmitters, causing unintended activations. An alternative approach involves using power line communication techniques, such as transmitting modulated signals over the 230 V network to control a relay or triac at the lamp. A specific commercial solution mentioned is the ZAMEL system, comprising the RNP-01 transmitter and ROP-01 receiver, which may require changing the existing bistable switch to a monostable button. Experience with ZAMEL's ExTA Free controllers indicates reliable operation with monostable switches over several years. Additional technical considerations include verifying the presence of both line (L) and neutral (N) conductors at the switch box to enable certain control methods.
Summary generated by the language model.
ADVERTISEMENT