Ecactly my point as well How on earth do you prove this very interesting point See again arguably you only have change one component implement a slightly different method, change or mofify the pcb for that matter in some way and effectivley Its an entirely different design wether the circuit changes is neither here no there The fact is you have re introduced a new design and theoritically you have But who owns that patent It doesnt have to be the circuit it could simply be the cosmetics or as Earl says the code within Still its interesting to see what people think As I said who actually owns anything anymore in wake of the net being placed into public hands or for that matter privacy on the net Since you utilise a public highway so to speak your information, designs etc are no longer private or confidential. Meaning of course that any information what ever you do eg design, code automatically becomes public and is no longer copywriteable Even if were the above mentioned points would make this invalid
You might even go as fas as to define this further in saying any comunicating device wether you choose to transmit information or not which is connected to a public network at any point in times renders your information which you considered to be private or confidential is deemed invalid
You might even go as fas as to define this further in saying any comunicating device wether you choose to transmit information or not which is connected to a public network at any point in times renders your information which you considered to be private or confidential is deemed invalid