Hi everyone,
As the figure and equation shows( picked from Marcel Pelgrom's Nyquist A to D converter, page 27)
If we analyze it from physics, equation 2.22 is quite right because the radius r2 is greater than r1,
but if we calculate it by calculus( integration), we know that r1 shoule be the denominator and r2 should be the nominator, just the inverse as equation 2.22.
So can anyone show me how we should analyze the structure correctly? I'm quite confused.
Thanks!
As the figure and equation shows( picked from Marcel Pelgrom's Nyquist A to D converter, page 27)
If we analyze it from physics, equation 2.22 is quite right because the radius r2 is greater than r1,
but if we calculate it by calculus( integration), we know that r1 shoule be the denominator and r2 should be the nominator, just the inverse as equation 2.22.
So can anyone show me how we should analyze the structure correctly? I'm quite confused.
Thanks!
