Setting Up CYFRAL SMART-D Intercom with LASKOMEX CD-2502 Control Panel

Hello

after renovation, I decided to replace the old intercom with the newly purchased CYFRAL SMAR-D, but I encountered problems with the correct setting, because in the old intercom there are no jumpers ZW1, 2,3,5 and 6, only those from apartment number. At the bottom is the Laskomex CD-2502 control panel. Please help. Pictures below.



best regards

The apartment number is 28?
If so, put jumpers like in an old uniphone - on 4/8/16.
https://www.elektroda.pl/rtvforum/topic3013914.html

Apartment number is 12. On both devices jumpers are installed on 4 and 8 .....

The fact it seemed to me that three are on the old uniphone.
In the link you have the instruction in which you have described how to set individual jumpers for systems other than Cyfral.

ZW1 translate to the right side.
Remove the jumper from ZW3 and ZW5.
Put the jumper on ZW2.

best regards

Ircys wrote:

ZW1 translate to the right side.
Remove the jumper from ZW3 and ZW5.
Put the jumper on ZW2.

best regards

oooo that's what this configuration was about at first the opening did not work (humming after pressing the button), but supplementing the above configuration with removing the ZW 6 jumper solved the problem.

Thank you very much and best regards

for laskomex I noticed that the zw6 jumper must always be removed

Thanks for the settings - it works perfectly.

I can only add that the experimentally select the microphone sensitivity - the Balance other potentiometer - turn to the right by about 1/4 turn to improve audibility at the bottom of the control unit.

Hello

Chicken, I have a problem with the same connection, all jumpers are attached as you indicated. When dialing the apartment number rings, I pick up everything is heard, sticking the code, you can also hear a beep in the house that someone is entering but, I can not open the door, the button does not respond - maybe you have some tips what I could change

best regards

Try with the ZW6 jumper - remove / replace.

best regards

Thanks a lot, I took out the jumper and everything works fine Ircys
best regards

Hello. I have the same hardware configuration. All jumpers set as you wrote and everything works, but you can hear a loud hum in the earpiece. What could be the reason?

Check (preferably in person), that the neighbor does not have the same humming at home.

best regards

I replaced the digital receiver myself today. Everything was ok in the old one.

and you distinguish humming from squeaking, because you can try to eliminate squeaking with potentiometers (on the board), and humming is a more serious problem?

best regards

No squeaking is definitely not.

Then advertise the uniphone

best regards

Hello, I raise the topic. I replaced the Uniphone Smart-D 2019 2v5, connected to the laskomex CD2502. Old was LM, it worked.
Cyfral is set as follows:
ZW2 - empty
ZW3 - empty
ZW5 - empty
ZW6 - empty
In this configuration, it rings, opens the door, there is a voice contact, but you can hear a squeaking / humming sound, it is difficult to determine what it is.
By changing the "balance other" potentiometer setting, the humming stops, but increases when speaking.

Maybe someone knows the solution to the problem? Thanks in advance.

petereus wrote:

Maybe someone knows the solution to the problem?

Yes, buying a dedicated uniphone, not combining it with a prosthesis.

This topic is from 2017-2018. In the so-called, meanwhile, from that date, changes were introduced in the software in the field of uniphone operation - without going into details, the signal stability was improved and additional corrective communication was introduced. What effectively released the "compatibility" (it never really was) of uniphones from other parishes. This is especially true of the Urmetes, but our data show that everyone got it.

To avoid problems we choose uniphones only and exclusively on the website of the system manufacturer in a block / house / facility - and not with the eyes, in a supermarket . Thanks for listening to my TED talk ...

good to know, i.e. to know the reasons
eh .... it used to be intercoms
who remembers, for example, actions under the title electronic cassette "proel" panel "laskomex"

IGS wrote:

good to know, i.e. to know the reasons
eh .... it used to be intercoms
who remembers, for example, actions under the title electronic cassette "proel" panel "laskomex"

Of course he remembers :)

It should be added that Laskomex is not the only manufacturer that "works on incompatibility with other systems".

It is not even that we are actively working towards blocking (following the example of printer manufacturers, it would be enough to introduce an additional chip to achieve this) - it's just that, when there is a change to be made, we do it - well, we will not look at whether Cyfral is OK, Urmet will still work and we will wait for Proel until they adapt their uniphones to our changes.

IGS wrote:

who remembers, for example, actions under the title electronic cassette "proel" panel "laskomex"

And who remembers the campaign "To whom to complain and why do some refer to others?"

Serwis_LX wrote:

IGS wrote:

who remembers, for example, actions under the title electronic cassette "proel" panel "laskomex"

And who remembers the campaign "To whom to complain and why do some refer to others?"

Don't joke - with such miracles you only blamed the inventor, that is ... himself

IGS wrote:

good to know, i.e. to know the reasons
eh .... it used to be intercoms
who remembers, for example, actions under the title electronic cassette "proel" panel "laskomex"

These kits still work.

gkwiatkowski wrote:

IGS wrote:

good to know, i.e. to know the reasons
eh .... it used to be intercoms
who remembers, for example, actions under the title electronic cassette "proel" panel "laskomex"

These kits still work.

I confirm

Speaking of the raimanns, I also see a few more acting.

Serwis_LX wrote:

It's not even that we are actively working towards blocking (like printer manufacturers, it would be enough to introduce an additional chip to achieve this) - it's just that when there is a change to be made, we do it

And here I would have a question. I have a system, let's say 8-10 years old, where the headquarters fell. Is there any risk that the old Lm-8 uniphones will not want to cooperate with the new Ec2502 control panel?

Exists. Old installations, old cables with a sufficiently large age difference can sometimes cause problems, it happened to us. The LY line uniphones are rather fussy.
Nevertheless, the risk is very small. Most often they just won't fit well with the panel and you will only need to do some audio line adjustment. And I warn you that there may appear "relatively" loud (this is a highly subjective issue, I have a uniphone right in front of me at the station and it is quite audible) "knocking" in the resting uniphone - and a light cricket in the background of the conversation (again - subjective - for I'm on the verge of hearing, my friend from the service cannot hear him at all). This is a consequence of the software changes and is normal. New uniphones do not have a "cricket" but the occasional tapping and yes.

Serwis_LX wrote:

Old installations, old cables

Yes, but the uniphones work properly on the old cables. Anyway, these old cables are of better quality than those currently purchased and all connections are soldered. The building has only 5 floors, two premises on the first floor.

Serwis_LX wrote:

And I warn you that there may appear "relatively" loud (this is a highly subjective issue, I have a uniphone right in front of me at the stand and it is quite audible) "knocking" in a resting uniphone

Thanks for the warning. So what is better to fix what I have? How's the deadlines now?

suworow wrote:

So what is better to fix what I have? How's the deadlines now?

Most likely not - it is better to replace the old electronics (in a black housing) with a new one, because it will give you fresh electronics, a 2.5-year warranty, new functions (eg RES function, "dentist's office" etc.) and other useful changes on the board. The delivery time depends on the current situation on the site - " first come - first served "- at least 2 weeks - up to 4.

It is also always possible to arrange a better date if the situation was drinking - but only on the phone. We do not charge extra fees as a priority, but try to "not play your favorites", so this may not always be possible.
And you still have to reckon with the fact that even a complaint out of sequence will effectively take up to a week, including all delivery times and our work.

Added after 12 [minutes]:

PS. Right now, we have relatively little work to do [ as of June 8, 2022 ]

suworow wrote:

Thanks for the warning.

For, let's say, ~ 90% of customers it won't be a problem or they won't notice ... But the other ~ 10% ... hence the warning.