logo elektroda
logo elektroda
X
logo elektroda

Automatic Phase Switch vs. Contactors for 16A+ Load Management?

lucjanobes 2979 20
ADVERTISEMENT
Treść została przetłumaczona polish » english Zobacz oryginalną wersję tematu
  • #1 18290139
    lucjanobes
    Level 5  
    Hello
    An automatic phase switch costs from £200 and handles up to 16 A. Above 16 A you need to give contactors + phase switch. This would cost me 300 zł.
    I thought that maybe instead of playing around with an automatic phase switch, wouldn't it be cheaper to buy contactors ( at a cost of 20 zł ) with different states ( open and closed) and do the switching on them? I'll blow a phase then it will automatically switch. What do you think?
    The only disadvantage would be that I would only have one emergency phase in case of switching with two contactors.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #2 18290172
    bumble
    Level 40  
    What exactly do you mean? Now phase loss does not happen. what is it supposed to be for? What is the point of this device?
  • #3 18290225
    lucjanobes
    Level 5  
    Maybe at your place they don't switch off the electricity at the power station. At our place they cyclically switch off as soon as the wind blows. It's mostly the same phase that goes off, which leaves me without light in the rooms. That's why I want to have automatic switching so that I don't have to short-circuit the wires like I used to do.
  • #4 18290377
    bumble
    Level 40  
    Then switch permanently to that phase which they do not switch off.

    Added after 4 [minutes]:

    https://www.fif.com.pl/pl/automatyczne-przelaczniki-faz/136-przelacznik-faz-pf-431.html
    And there is nothing more to look for. It switches phases when the voltage drops below 195V, which is uninterruptible, and you can't do that with contactors, so if something goes wrong you can short-circuit the phases and you'll be on your way.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #5 18290492
    Janusz_kk
    Level 39  
    bumble wrote:
    And there is nothing more to look for.
    .
    Maybe a colleague could read the author's post with understanding? because that seems to have been lacking.
    To the author on contactors it is possible, but it is necessary to use contacts so that there is no
    It is possible to use contactors on contactors, but it is necessary to use contacts so that it is not possible to switch two or more phases at the same time. For this purpose you can use
    auxiliary contacts.
  • #6 18290502
    bumble
    Level 40  
    Janusz_kk wrote:
    bumble wrote:
    And there is nothing more to look for.
    .
    Perhaps a colleague could read the author's post with understanding? because that seems to have been lacking.
    To the author on contactors can be done, but you need to use the contacts so that there is no
    It is possible to use contactors on contactors, but it is necessary to use contacts so that it is not possible to switch two or more phases at the same time. For this purpose you can use
    auxiliary contacts.

    Is it possible? Maybe a colleague can upload a schematic of what? Like a small one? what is to control these contactors? How to manage switching without a power failure? Maybe a short description?
  • #7 18290904
    CYRUS2
    Level 43  
    lucjanobes wrote:
    When I have a phase it will automatically switch over. What do you guys think about this?
    On a "nut" this is not done.
    It is not that simple - it is not "zero-one".
    You have to define the cut-off voltage and the return voltage.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #8 18291295
    mawerix123
    Level 39  
    bumble wrote:
    Does it work? Maybe a colleague can upload a schematic of what? Like a small one ? what is to control these contactors ? How to manage switching without a power failure? Maybe a short description?
    .

    It is possible and you can look up the schematic yourself, this F&F does not switch without a blackout, it has three relays in it, so how do you imagine :?: anyway, no one insists that there should be a blackout, even it is unhealthy for phase-to-phase switching.

    lucjanobes wrote:
    it would be cheaper to buy contactors ( cost 20 zł ) with different states ( open and closed)
    .

    for 20 zł :?: hmm
  • #9 18291475
    Janusz_kk
    Level 39  
    lucjanobes wrote:
    I was thinking that maybe instead of playing around with an automatic phase switch, wouldn't it be cheaper to buy contactors ( cost 20 zł ) with different states ( open and closed) and do the switching on them?
    .
    Where do they sell contactors so cheaply that have more than 16A from a relay?

    ww.tme.eu/en/details/ika25-22_230v/contactors-modules-glow/iskra/30-046-014/
    this one costs 63zł.
    And here is my suggestion: Automatic Phase Switch vs. Contactors for 16A+ Load Management? .
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #10 18292130
    lucjanobes
    Level 5  
    Janusz_kk wrote:
    Where do they sell contactors so cheaply that they have more than 16A
    On a Chinese well-known portal :) .
  • #11 18292226
    bumble
    Level 40  
    This I would accept maybe 1.6A as it says 16A. If it's a phase for long term power supply to a house for example I wouldn't risk it. Single contactors ok but it will take up more space and risk more damage.
  • #12 18293384
    lucjanobes
    Level 5  
    What company are good contactors from?
  • #13 18293387
    bumble
    Level 40  
    Check out the electrical wholesalers. Maybe schneider.
  • #14 18293557
    czesiu
    Level 37  
    lucjanobes wrote:
    ...It mostly falls on the same phase which results in me being deprived of light in the rooms. This is why I want to have automatic switching so that I don't have to connect the wires short as I have done so far.
    .
    My advice, however, is to use an automatic phase switch. In most cases, after a phase loss in the distribution network, a voltage close to half of the supply voltage is maintained on the "sick" phase (I will not now explain why, I suggest the author to check with a voltmeter at the next fault).
    Also, in most cases, the contactor, when the voltage drops to half of Un, will not switch off (there is such a parameter for contactors: dropout voltage). The idea with contactors alone will not work.
  • #15 18294901
    lucjanobes
    Level 5  
    czesiu wrote:
    In most cases, after a phase failure in the distribution network, the voltage on the "sick" phase remains close to half the supply voltage (I will not now explain why
    Once when there was an outage for 3 days (three phases died) I had a voltage of 14 V to 70 V on one of these phases. Some equipment on 230 volts worked normally. Such a radio was playing, a laptop was charging and a fridge was "working" although its output was poor. As you can see, it is possible to squeeze quite a lot out of such a low voltage when the electronics have a large spread.

    The funniest thing was that first on the phase there was 180 V in two hours 150 V. The next day it was already 120 V. It went down like that for these three days to a final 14 V, on which the internet modem worked correctly.
    On the other two phases it was just a few volts from the beginning of the fault.

    Everyone in the neighbourhood laughed at this, because there was apparently no electricity, but the propaganda radio could be listened to normally.
  • #16 18295487
    elezibi
    Level 21  
    Janusz_kk wrote:
    .

    And here is my proposal: Automatic Phase Switch vs. Contactors for 16A+ Load Management?


    Oh I wouldn't be so sure about this arrangement
    When applying power before contactor L1 cuts off N to the coils of the other contactors, what will contactors L2 and L3 do ?
    Once it has cut the N to the coils of the L2 and L3 contactors, won't they have any "desire" to work "interphase"?
  • #17 18295526
    bumble
    Level 40  
    Always from a simple matter, colleagues are able to complicate everything to the maximum. There is a problem? There is a special solution. What else is there to look for? There are ready-made systems for this, not home-made constructions that pose a danger to people, animals and property. Apparently, what do we wear on our hands? A watch? What for? To tell the time. How about something else instead of a watch. And these examples can be multiplied at will. There is an automatic switch that operates without interruption, so we use it.
    We have an L1 phase. Phase L1 disappears and we have 150V instead. However, the contactor does not switch phase L2 because L1 did not let go. Not together that on day three there was 120V and the fridge was still running.
  • #18 18295528
    Ryszard49
    Level 38  
    elezibi , I don't suppose you suspect that colleague Janusz_kk was so unreasonable as to propose an untested solution? This can be checked by assembling the layout.
    bumble , we are already like that, we do everything to complicate our lives.
  • #19 18296190
    retrofood
    VIP Meritorious for electroda.pl
    lucjanobes wrote:
    .
    I thought that maybe instead of playing around with an automatic phase switch, wouldn't it be cheaper to buy contactors ( at a cost of £20 ) with different states ( open and closed) and do the switching on them? I'll blow a phase then it will automatically switch. What do you think of this?
    .

    All contactors and relays have a "voltage drive" which has a certain hysteresis loop. That is, a different (higher) voltage is needed to attract the jumper and a different (lower) voltage is needed for it to drop out. This is why it is difficult and not cheap to make an automatic phase switch, because when one phase is de-energised, the voltage distribution changes! There is no longer a triangle! And with structurally simple systems, the voltage coil of the contactor from the phase that has decayed does not want to let go at all!

    That's why I advise against such games, the subject has been worked out for a long time, you only have to search in the literature.
  • #20 18296281
    bumble
    Level 40  
    You don't even need to look in the literature because there are ready-made devices. And that's what they are there for. In addition, they ensure uninterruptible switching and the voltage will not drop below 195V during a phase failure. In addition, the author writes that after a phase failure he has 180V and the devices work for several days. Somehow I cannot believe this. I remember a little from the past quite a long time ago and there was voltage on one phase loss but much lower. Usually it was repaired in a few hours. Well I didn't know there could still be such a situation because usually when a phase failure is detected on the MV the whole power supply is disconnected.
  • #21 18296295
    retrofood
    VIP Meritorious for electroda.pl
    bumble wrote:
    I remember a little from the past quite a while back and with the loss of one phase there was voltage on it but much lower.
    .
    This can vary greatly. Depending both on how it is on the MV side, the LV side and even how the consumers at the end user were configured at the time of the fault. And where, at what point these voltages are measured. And with what.

Topic summary

The discussion revolves around the choice between using an automatic phase switch and contactors for managing loads above 16A. The author considers the cost-effectiveness of using contactors, which are cheaper but may not provide the same reliability as an automatic phase switch. Responses highlight the importance of automatic switching in scenarios where phase loss occurs frequently, as experienced by the author. Concerns are raised about the limitations of contactors, particularly regarding their ability to handle voltage drops and the risk of simultaneous phase switching. The consensus leans towards using an automatic phase switch for its reliability and safety, despite the higher initial cost. Various technical aspects, such as dropout voltage and hysteresis in contactors, are discussed, emphasizing the complexity of creating a reliable switching system with contactors alone.
Summary generated by the language model.
ADVERTISEMENT