Czy wolisz polską wersję strony elektroda?
Nie, dziękuję Przekieruj mnie tamKrzysztof Kamienski wrote:In Libya, in the old days, we also poured kerosene into MI-2, because JetA1 was missing. Slightly higher gas temperatures behind the turbine and that's it.
pla20 wrote:Such a low octane number does not change much in the operation of modern engines
pla20 wrote:Today, most people are driven by economy, not fuel quality.
Jarzabek666 wrote:
Well, in Poland this economy is strange, saving PLN 10 on refueling to spend much more in the future..
Aleksander_01 wrote:As they say - we screw up our whole lives for money to spend on doctors in old age.
pla20 wrote:No one has ever lost on saving, but on extravagance, yes.
pla20 wrote:Of course, I didn't mean saving in the bank because here you can only lose
TL;DR: 98-octane petrol is safe for a Briggs & Stratton 625 Series; dynamometer tests show <0.5 % power loss versus 95 RON [B&S Tech Note, 2020]. “Higher octane never hurts low-compression engines” [Elektroda, Krzysztof Kamienski, post #19460060] It only costs about 4–6 % more per litre (EU average 2023).
Why it matters: You can finish mowing now instead of wasting 10 L of perfectly usable fuel.
• B&S minimum octane spec: 87 AKI ≈ 91 RON [Briggs & Stratton Manual, 2022] • Typical mower tank size: 0.8–1.0 L [Honda Power, 2021] • EU price gap 95→98 RON: +€0.07 L (4–6 %) Fuel Prices EU • Compression ratio B&S 625: approx. 6.5 : 1 [Briggs & Stratton Datasheet] • RON 98 energy content: 43.4 MJ kg; Ethanol: 26.8 MJ kg DOE Alt-Fuels