robert123 wrote: Congratulations on your successful construction.It is unbelievable that it has such sensitivity.At my place in podlaskie it would probably be silent.
My radio had to contain these amplification stages,with 5 or 6.It serves me as a bathroom radio.
Did you try to build the HF amplifier as a resonant one - variable capacitor in parallel to L3 and tuning? It seems to me that you would increase its sensitivity even more. Robert R.
Thank you

I too was surprised that a design running on just two vintage transistors would play so nicely. This is in part due to the long ferrite antenna, when I put a ferrite rod to the radio it plays even better.
With a resonant circuit on a transformer winding I haven't tried, mainly because I haven't come across such a concept anywhere. This is a specific circuit where even changing the diode turns the whole thing into a generator. However, when I get the chance I will probably try it out of curiosity, as well as using the Schottky diode mentioned by
@_ACeK_, SMD I don't have but SB340 does.
tesla97 wrote: Why are germanium semiconductors really used and not silicon semiconductors?
Because they are historical components and while they are still available you can see how electronics used to be. Germanium transistors actually had a short episode in the development of semiconductors because, around the end of the 1960s, the rapid development of silicon-based semiconductors began.
Some of their properties have an advantage over silicon, e.g. low conduction voltage: the Ueb voltage in a silicon transistor is about 0.7 V, in a germanium transistor it is about 0.2 V, but in general silicon wins in many other, more important respects.
CHOPIN66 wrote: I'm building a receiver from this book myself, only that this 5 transistor one - with an HF amplifier included in the response and reflex so it should have even more sensitivity.
As I think correctly, you are referring to the schematic from page 368, indeed an interesting design, especially the first stage as the ferrite antenna has three windings.
Plus the final stage on two TG50s and a transformer feeding opposite phase current to their bases. A radio worth building.
PiotrPitucha wrote: Superheterodyne radio on a single transistor, personally I never liked winding coils that exceeded 10 turns and in today's receivers there are more semiconductors than coils, sometimes none at all.(...)
By the way, I have a question about "cristal" headphones which they passionately use in Japan for such constructions, in very old times the Soviet in-ear version of such headphones cost pennies and now I only find headphones with prices of > 100 PLN
Interesting and unprecedented examples, those from the east have a fantasy when it comes to simplifying electronics. With this heterodyne, I'm afraid there might be quite a problem getting it to solidify and run.
I don't know what the "cristal" are, maybe some kind of piezo? I bought a 2000 ohm model on a sales portal for about 70zl, later on I picked up similar ones on the market but in worse condition for 10zl and a similarly priced Soviet 1600 ohm with potentiometer. With the latter an interesting story, because they are equipped with a plug composed of two joined "bananas" with a raster like a 230 V plug, the seller admitted that he wanted to check them and plugged them into the socket, but as the peasant looked normal and had no crooked ears, I took and discovered that the potentiometer on the cable acted as a fuse
I found footage on yt where you can see and hear such a single-transistor receiver (silicon transistor), it's worth noting what speaker is connected via the 5 kΩ trafo:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6yvyg5N4nc
puchalak wrote: I remember that the only source of electronics information and schematics available to me at the time, was the library in primary school (youngsters probably won't understand). Most of the few books there were by the same author and even then they seemed quite archaic. Does anyone know what his fate was? Given that the publishers were hooked on the 1950s, he's probably long dead.
For my part, I can say that the author was a practitioner and knew his way around radios

I did everything according to the author's instructions and after so many years after publication the radio played practically first time. What his history is I am not able to say, only that he was still publishing in the Young Technician, but in the 1970s from what I could find. There is another author active in radio engineering - Roman Kozak, I don't know maybe they are related?