Cool? Ranking DIY
Cool? Ranking DIY
TechEkspert wrote:I in the army accidentally put a buzzer from razor blades on the interphase. The water disappeared together with the cup and the razor blades.The shells looked from the inside just like the inside of the fuse.It was probably the biggest "burn".Sometimes I have come across fuses that were not blown but were covered on the inside with a layer of metal.
TechEkspert wrote:When a large current is switched off, the metal from the wire vaporises and deposits on the glass, and this causes a voltage breakdown and current flow over the glass. This is likely to cause heating and cracking of the glass. This situation does not occur with a sand-filled fuse.I think you can also see the metal vapour deposition on the tube.
TechEkspert wrote:No, although it can be done that way. I was referring to forcing the current to flow but so that it would not be a short circuit.The kettle would limit the charging current of the capacitors?
ArturAVS wrote:a colleague was replacing a live switchboard (because the ZE was only due to arrive in a week's time to disconnect the transformer substation) and a pair of pliers slipped out of his hand while he was putting in a new one (still on the resotex ). They fell on the phase-to-phase terminals and evaporated. Admittedly, the colleague covered himself with his hand at the last moment, but still half his face was burnt. He was laid off for a month and had to grow a beard to hide the scars.the largest fuses I was able to "plant" were BMy 630A in the company switchboard
398216 Usunięty wrote:It's fun to bump this up with electricians and wire cross-section selectionthe thickness of the path is only a few tens of MIKROMETERS.
TL;DR: A 3.15A glass fuse can still explode during a mains short because fault current can far exceed its safe interrupting limit, and one expert warned that sand-filled fuses "extinguish" the arc faster. This FAQ is for repairers and hobbyists who need to prevent shard injuries, arc damage, and avoidable equipment loss during fuse faults. [#21026920]
Why it matters: A fuse rating in amps alone does not tell you whether the fuse will survive a real short circuit without spraying glass, metal vapor, or ceramic fragments.
| Fuse / setup | Construction mentioned in thread | Behavior under high fault current | Practical consequence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ordinary 3.15A glass fuse | Glass tube, visible fusible wire | Wire burns, glass cracks, shards can fly | Eye-injury risk during mains faults |
| Sand-filled fuse | Filler identified as silica/quartz sand | Better arc extinction, less surface flashover | Limits damage duration and fragmentation |
| Large ceramic BM fuse | Thick ceramic body with sand filling | Can still burst under very severe faults | Ceramic fragments can be sharper than glass |
Key insight: Choose a fuse by breaking capacity and construction, not just current rating. In the thread, both small glass fuses and large sand-filled BM links failed violently when the available fault energy was high enough. [#21026715]