Thanks kaleron. I thought so too.
And if you get such a drive with SATAFIRM, can you get such a firmware?
And if you get such a drive with SATAFIRM, can you get such a firmware?
Czy wolisz polską wersję strony elektroda?
Nie, dziękuję Przekieruj mnie tamlisek wrote:See if this is it
TomaszTorbus wrote:Is it what I marked in the photo?
TomaszTorbus wrote:Goodram CX400 128GB.
TomaszTorbus wrote:According to the FW sticker: SBFM61.3
TomaszTorbus wrote:SBRM02.0
gradek83 wrote:This firmware, my friend, is factory and refers to the masked ROM of the main controller, for example, mine is SBRM07.0. All these fixes only work when NANDs are OK, when NANDs are degraded to max, no fix will increase the firmware. Without mass production and RDT and recalculation of the defect list and a new translator, this makes no sense. And it works for a while.This firmware was probably uploaded by you or someone foolishly.
gradek83 wrote:SBFM61.5. No MP Tool lifted my CX400. No fix either. You think I haven't tried? I tried on 4 platforms and nothing.And what firmware do you have? What version do you have on the rating sticker?
Marvell_88i8945 wrote:So the disk has two firmwares or should it be treated separately? How to check what firmware I have for the masked ROM? Which program shows this, which firmware can be updated, or is it done during the update, the name is a regular firmware, e.g.: SBFM61.5This firmware, my friend, is factory and refers to the masked ROM of the main controller, for example, mine is SBRM07.0.
gradek83 wrote:I have 2 sticks of 256 GB each with 2 x 16 channels, crappy Toshiba Bics4, I reballed them one by one, I reballed Phison's main MCU as well, I poured warm urine on this disk because I lost the BGA balls, I only spent a lot of time on experiments . Which turned out to be a fiasco anyway.If you think that it may be the fault of one of the memory chips, maybe (if such a trick works) it would be possible to purely experimentally cut off the power supply to each of the memory chips and maybe then you will be able to locate the faulty chip and replace it or, if it will be possible to use it without it. This can be treated as an experiment.
gradek83 wrote:Yes, the disk has 2 FWs, one is used to initialize the controller, in this case for Phison, the other is the Nandow FW, and depending on the manufacturer, many are used, it is for NAND access, there is also a FW for RDT, which is used for low-level Nandow self-tests, for new NANDs. Revision Masked ROM will not show you when FW Nandow is loaded because there is no need for it. Masked ROM is needed to reinstall FW for NANDs, for JTAG, debug over UART, but anyway, in my case I have already diagnosed that I need to perform a full self-test of NANDs, reconstruct the Defect list, translator to re-initialize access to NANDs, because currently it is it's a mishmash and nothing works. And this is achieved through a USB dongle that allows you to force the RDT NAND selftest mode, you just need to build it.So the disk has two firmwares or should it be treated separately? How to check what firmware I have for the masked ROM? Which program shows this, which firmware can be updated, or is it done during the update, the name is a regular firmware, e.g.: SBFM61.5