Czy wolisz polską wersję strony elektroda?
Nie, dziękuję Przekieruj mnie tamTechEkspert wrote:which must perform positioning, regardless of whether there is writing or reading, this can confirm an increase in energy consumption during searching, i.e. an extreme case of intense work of the positioning mechanism
TechEkspert wrote:interestingly, for some drives, e.g. WD RE4 2TB, the search resulted in a significant increase in current consumption in the 12V branch - positioning coil
TL;DR: 3.5″ WD RED HDD idles at 3.4 W [Elektroda, TechEkspert, post #14528907] while a 128 GB SSD idles at 0.4 W [Elektroda, TechEkspert, post #14528907]; “SSDs finish the operation faster” [Elektroda, TechEkspert, post #14531343]
Why it matters: Lower idle draw and shorter tasks mean longer battery life and smaller power-supply bills.
• 3.5″ NL-SATA HDD start-up surge: ~1.8 A @ 12 V [Elektroda, TechEkspert, post #14528907] • 2.5″ NAS HDDs use 0 A on 12 V rail; 5 V only [Elektroda, TechEkspert, post #14528907] • GoodRAM 240 GB SSD idle power: 0.1 W [Elektroda, TechEkspert, post #14528907] • SSD peak read: 394 MB/s at 2.4 W [Elektroda, TechEkspert, post #14528907] • Typical multimeter class UT58D accuracy: ±2 % + 50 mA [Elektroda, SStaszekk, post #14535549]