logo elektroda
logo elektroda
X
logo elektroda

Which ball valve control to choose for an alarm system?

jajen 3987 39
ADVERTISEMENT
Treść została przetłumaczona polish » english Zobacz oryginalną wersję tematu
  • #1 17292190
    jajen
    Level 17  
    I have a question about the type of shut-off valve control. I want to control the valve in such a way that it closes the water when the alarm is armed and opens it when the alarm is disarmed. The alarm control panel controls a relay module which has NO, COM, NC contacts. And now my question - which type of valve to choose. With two-point or three-point control and do I understand this correctly.

    As far as I know, two-point control means that one wire goes N, the second L (the valve is then closed) and the third L wire opens the valve and the disconnection closes it.

    Three-point control works in such a way that N goes to one wire and depending on whether L is fed to the second or third wire the valve will either close or open.

    Is there any difference between the two types of valve in my application? I can connect the two-point valve in such a way that N and L goes to the first wire and the second wire relays L to the third wire so that the valve opens and closes.

    And in the case of a three-point I can feed L with NO and NC contacts once to one wire and once to the other. I have tested such a control. In practice I don't see any special difference to my application. Is there any?

    The second thing - do both these types of valves have limit switches and once the set state is reached, they do not draw any current (regardless of whether it is open or closed)? It seems that they do. But I see that e.g. such a valve Link is made as normally closed and I don't understand what it means by normally since after reaching a preset state the valve should stop drawing current (regardless of whether it is open or closed and remain in this position, so it should not have a "normal" state). With valves with three-point control there is no distinction between NO and NC , which suggests that the two-point ones need a continuous supply to stay open? For me this is important, because a valve that draws current to be open (i.e. NC) would always have to be live when someone is at home. Anyway, the reverse version is the same only while the alarm is armed. That's why I'm looking for something that has a limit switch.

    Third thing - anyone recommend a good valve. I previously had a three-point Chinese one for 150 zł with turnbuckles. Type of control nice but after 2 weeks of operation the plastic connection of the valve to the motor broke. I am now looking for something better . The one from the link seems to be ok Herz is about 500 zł . Anyone recommend ?
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • Helpful post
    #2 17292898
    Gagatek77
    Level 15  
    Hi. Use a valve with a "three point" control - N wire, and 2x L, one for closing and the other for opening. Such a valve needs power only for the time of opening/closing. Two-line valves in one position draw current all the time. At a friend's place such a valve was installed and it heated up a lot and drew a lot of current (12W of power has to be dissipated somewhere, and thus the valve in the open position was very warm, even though it was for continuous operation.
    NO - normally open - power to close
    NC - normally closed - power to open
    Both of the above-mentioned types do not have limit switches. Theoretically only valves with three supply lines have limiters which disconnect the valve drive when closing/opening, but it also depends on the design because they may have a clutch and therefore the supply must be given for a certain time.
  • #3 17292910
    karolark
    Level 42  
    If it has to be on-off, isn't it simpler to use a simple solenoid valve?
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • Helpful post
    #4 17292914
    Gagatek77
    Level 15  
    karolark wrote:
    If it has to be on/off, isn't it simpler to use an ordinary solenoid valve?
    .
    A normal solenoid valve in one of the positions - closed/open depending on whether it is no/nc draws current all the time.
  • #5 17292917
    karolark
    Level 42  
    Gagatek77 wrote:
    karolark wrote:
    If it has to be on/off, isn't it simpler to use an ordinary solenoid valve?
    .
    An ordinary solenoid valve in one of the positions - closed/open depending on whether it is no/nc draws current all the time.


    Well, and this is supposed to be a disadvantage? This is a power in the order of 5-7VA
  • Helpful post
    #6 17292923
    Gagatek77
    Level 15  
    karolark wrote:
    .
    Well, and this is supposed to be a disadvantage? This is a power in the order of 5-7VA


    Of course, 7W is not much, but first of all, if you count it up, it's almost 50 zlotys a year, secondly, it's some small valve, at the entrance to the house you usually have 1 and 1/4 inches, and such a valve is already drawing 12W. In any case, a constantly operating valve is not the best solution.
  • #7 17292947
    jajen
    Level 17  
    Thanks. My guess has been confirmed.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #8 17292954
    Gagatek77
    Level 15  
    Select the valve model to suit your needs. Price does not always go hand in hand with quality. Perhaps you have come across a faulty unit? Buy from an established stationary shop/wholesaler so that you have somewhere to complain if something goes wrong.
  • #9 17292974
    karolark
    Level 42  
    Gagatek77 wrote:
    karolark wrote:
    .
    Well, and this is supposed to be a disadvantage? This is a power in the order of 5-7VA


    Of course, 7W is not much, but first of all, if you count it up, it's almost 50 zlotys a year, secondly, it's a small valve, at the entrance to the house you usually have 1 and 1/4 inches, and such a valve already draws 12W. In any case, a constantly operating valve is not the best solution.


    Just have a colleague count the difference in ball valve control and its price and the cost of the solenoid valve :D .
  • #10 17293542
    Gagatek77
    Level 15  
    karolark wrote:
    Gagatek77 wrote:
    karolark wrote:
    .
    Well, and this is supposed to be a disadvantage? This is a power in the order of 5-7VA


    Of course, 7W is not much, but first of all, if you count it up, it's almost 50 zlotys a year, secondly, it's some small valve, at the entrance to the house you usually have 1 and 1/4 inches, and such a valve is already drawing 12W. In any case, a constantly operating valve is not the best solution.


    Just have a colleague count the difference in ball valve control and its price and the cost of the solenoid valve :D
    .

    Then what is more reliable? A valve that operates 12 hours a day or one that operates twice a day - closing / opening?
  • #11 17293572
    karolark
    Level 42  
    Gagatek77 wrote:
    karolark wrote:
    Gagatek77 wrote:
    karolark wrote:
    karolark wrote:
    .
    Well, and this is supposed to be a disadvantage? This is a power in the order of 5-7VA


    Of course, 7W is not much, but first of all, if you count it up, it's almost 50 zlotys a year, secondly, it's a small valve, at the entrance to the house you usually have 1 and 1/4 inches, and such a valve is already drawing 12W. In any case, a constantly operating valve is not the best solution.


    Just have a colleague count the difference in ball valve control and its price and the cost of the solenoid valve :D
    .

    Then let a colleague consider which is more reliable? A valve that operates 12 hours a day or one that operates 2 times a day - closing/opening?


    I don't have to wonder, I know
    Solenoid valves last a couple of years each - and I know from experience having installed at least a few hundred :D
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #12 17293681
    kood
    CCTV and Stationary Alarms specialist
    To control the water shut-off by the control panel if you don't want problems I would suggest a ball valve on 12V DC rather than 230V AC.
  • #13 17294739
    Gagatek77
    Level 15  
    kood wrote:
    For control of water shut-off by the control panel if you don't want problems I would suggest a ball solenoid valve on 12V DC and not on 230V AC.
    .

    A 12V valve will unnecessarily draw current from the control panel battery if there is a mains power failure.

    karolark wrote:

    I don't have to wonder I know
    Solenoid valves last a couple of years each - and I know from experience having installed at least a few hundred :D


    Great, only the author wrote that it failed him rather quickly....
    I don't deny that the two-wire ones are bad, but I would use one that has two stable positions for shutting off and closing, additionally such a valve has the possibility of manual closing / opening in case of power failure. Besides, there is always something that heats up (and heats up a lot, because you can't keep your hand on an operating valve), which is a place of potential failure.

    It's great that a colleague has installed so many of these, please let me know what models the author proposes to use. In my opinion, it is important for the author to know the pros and cons (advantages and disadvantages) of using different types of valves.

    In the case of a failure of the water installation behind the valve and in the absence of power supply (bvo water flew on the socket, etc., the differential and another avria - well, that's a bummer), you can give up installing the valve, because it will not work anyway.
    Such a false sense of security.

    When applying a given solution, various cases must be considered and what sense does it make to use one valve or another at this point in time.
  • #14 17294896
    kood
    CCTV and Stationary Alarms specialist
    Gagatek77 wrote:
    A valve on 12V will unnecessarily draw current from the panel battery when there is a mains power failure.


    Not unnecessarily, but in order for such a valve to make sense and not be a dummy, it must be solved in such a way that the battery capacity is properly selected. A 230V valve will not work and perform its function in the event of a mains voltage failure unless you use a UPS, but this is rather pointless for the valve itself.
    There are 2 possibilities: if the alarm is armed and the customer has no water, the second worse possibility is that the customer has no electricity, the alarm is armed, the valve does not close and the flat is flooded.

    Such a ball valve draws current only during operation, operating time 20 seconds, current consumption 1A, to draw 1Ah from the battery you need 150 cycles.
  • #15 17294924
    Gagatek77
    Level 15  
    kood wrote:
    Gagatek77 wrote:
    The 12V valve will unnecessarily draw current from the panel battery as a mains power failure occurs.
    For the following reasons.

    Not unnecessarily, but in order for such a valve to make sense and not be a dummy, it must be solved in such a way that the battery capacity is properly selected. A 230V valve will not work and perform its function in the event of a mains voltage failure unless you use a UPS, but this is rather pointless for the valve itself.
    There are 2 possibilities: if the alarm is armed and the customer has no water, the second worse possibility is that the customer has no electricity, the alarm is armed, the valve does not close and the flat is flooded.

    Such a ball valve only draws current during operation, operating time 20 seconds, current consumption 1A, to draw 1Ah from the battery you need 150 cycles.
    .

    So you expand and complicate everything, UPS, large batteries etc....
    Mate don't go down this route, as you are only pointlessly complicating a system that could be simple and reliable. You will increase the price of a super valve several times over by using a UPS or a large battery in a system which must already have a suitable buffer power supply ... This approach to the spree is a failure. I hope that colleagues with more experience than those who have spoken here will confirm the validity of simplifying and thus increasing reliability.
  • #16 17294947
    kood
    CCTV and Stationary Alarms specialist
    Gagatek77 wrote:
    That is, you expand and complicate everything


    I'm not complicating anything, you put in a valve on 12V you do a power balance and this is probably enough in an average system because 1A drawn for several seconds when arming and disarming the alarm will have practically no effect on the battery life of the alarm.
    If you already put an electro-valve and connect it to the system, it should perform its function.
  • #17 17294958
    Gagatek77
    Level 15  
    Which valve are you talking about? Bistable or monostable No or NC? Because let's start from the fact that I don't think such things should be controlled from the power supply of an SSWiN system anyway.
  • #18 17295081
    kood
    CCTV and Stationary Alarms specialist
    such as:
    Which ball valve control to choose for an alarm system? .

    This one has a closing time of 10 seconds and draws 500mA current during this time.
    I would connect limit contacts to the control panel inputs in order to detect when the valve does not close when it should and for the system to inform the user if the valve does not close when it should.
    I have already had the case of servicing an alarm where there was a solenoid valve and the premises flooded when the alarm was armed. I don't know if my predecessor who installed this system was held responsible, but he certainly lost the customer.

    Gagatek77 wrote:
    and yes I think that such things should not be controlled from the power supply of an SSWiN system.
    .
    Can you elaborate on what you see wrong with feeding the valve from the SSWiN? Because we are about to find out that electric door openers or relays controlling e.g. lighting should not be connected to the SSWiN either.
  • #19 17295142
    Gagatek77
    Level 15  
    I mean the valve to be powered from the control panel battery, the valve proposed by a colleague fits in with the solution proposed by me, except that I would control it from the control panel as much as possible but I would not power it from the control panel but from an independent circuit, and here a valve powered from 230V and control on 3 wires (N and 2x L - close/open) would suffice. Limiters as they are will come in handy. And don't be ironic mate @kood .
    kood wrote:
    Can you elaborate on what you see wrong with feeding the valve from the SSWiN? Because we are about to learn that door openers or relays controlling e.g. lighting should not be connected to the SSWiN either.

    Just try to read with understanding. The power supply is not from the SSWiN system, but the control from it is.
  • #20 17295169
    kood
    CCTV and Stationary Alarms specialist
    Gagatek77 wrote:
    but not supplied from the control panel but an independent circuit, and here a valve supplied from 230V and control on 3 wires (N and 2x L- close/open) is sufficient.
    .

    And how do you solve a situation where there is no power whether during arming or disarming? Do you explain to the customer that if there is no power he will have no water, or that if a pipe bursts he will be flooded because the system will not work?

    Gagatek77 wrote:
    Power not from SSWiN system but control from it yes.
    .
    Justify what is wrong with feeding the valve from the control panel.
  • #21 17295224
    synology1
    Level 16  
    I have been using this solenoid valve for lawn watering for a long time and have installed it for my friends as well. There are no problems, of course, there is information about opening and closing from the control unit and also a manual mode.
    https://youtu.be/rIieXQqkfHk
  • #22 17295235
    Gagatek77
    Level 15  
    kood wrote:
    Gagatek77 wrote:
    but not supplied from the control panel but an independent circuit, and here a valve supplied from 230V and control on 3 wires (N and 2x L- close/open) is sufficient.
    .

    And how do you solve a situation where there is no power whether during arming or disarming? Would you explain to the customer to accept that if there is no electricity he will have no water, or that if a pipe bursts he will be flooded because the system will not work?

    Gagatek77 wrote:
    Power not from SSWiN system but control from it yes.

    Justify what is wrong with powering the valve from the control panel.


    Mate you really can't read with understanding, well I'm explaining again that control from the control panel and power not from its circuit and this does not preclude the use of a buffer power supply with battery. I hope you understand this now. You can control and power as you wish. Everyone is making suggestions to solve the problem. The other thing is that it all depends on the customer, because if he wants to use an emergency power supply for the valve, he can even use a generator, his business. By the way, how many times have you had to deal with this besides the described case of flooding? Another thing is that due to the fact that plumbers are often - no disrespect to them - not very clever guys (seriously, no offence) at the time of any repair or something like that, they can make a real mess whether it's in the electrical system or other, repairing/reconstructing the hydraulic system. That's why I'd be afraid of connecting to a power supply from a rather important and sensitive alarm system to such errors. If I had a small buffer power supply, even one with a 1.2Ah battery, I could rest assured that nothing would be damaged. And please accept this as my opinion and do not catch me by the word to have an idle discussion anymore. Because practically everything has already been written.

    synology1 wrote:
    I use this solenoid valve for lawn watering, I have had it for a long time, my friends also installed it 0 problems, of course there is information from the end controls about opening and closing in addition to the manual mode.
    https://youtu.be/rIieXQqkfHk


    Interesting solution with the valve from the film, question if you can get it in our country because according to me only with Chinese friends, but the price of 18 dollars is tempting.

    https://pl.aliexpress.com/item/CWX-25S-DN15-1...ith-manual-override-electric/32598159685.html

    The question is how about the failure rate. Please state which valve models you use, then it is also easier to discuss the proposed solutions.
  • #24 17296149
    kood
    CCTV and Stationary Alarms specialist
    Gagatek77 wrote:
    Dude you really can't read with understanding, well I'm explaining again that the control is from the control panel and the power supply is not from its circuit and this does not preclude the use of a buffer power supply with battery.
    .

    Now you're turning the cartoon on its head: first you write that the solenoid valve on 12V is bad and that it should be on 230V, that's where the discussion started, now you're proposing a buffer power supply, probably a valve on 12V.

    Gagatek77 wrote:
    By the way, how many times have you had to deal with this besides the described case of flooding ?
    .

    With what ? With solenoid valves? Quite often customers for alarms or building automation, after having been offered such a solution and having been shown how it works, want to have such protection, some in combination with flood detectors, others, like the author of the topic, controlled by the alarm system's sensing.

    I had a case where someone was flooded despite the fact that someone had previously set up such a system in the facility. And it was just such a case as the solution proposed by you, among others, with a valve which has no emergency power supply. That's why, in order for someone not to create a dummy, I wrote that it's better to give the valve a 12V power supply from the control panel, then the system is maximally simplified and reliable.
  • #25 17296223
    jajen
    Level 17  
    But the topic has exploded. So nice.

    I solved the problem like this. I gave a valve with N-controlled and 2x L- closed/open limiters (something like the one in the links above). Control from the control panel, supply to the valve from 230V. I have no or only occasional power shortages (2-3 per year). Secondly, I find it hard to believe that such a coincidence would cause the water system to fail just when there is no power. I would have to be very unlucky. Just in case, I've made a bypass with a manual valve so that I can run the water in the event of a power failure or a problem with the control panel. Thanks to everyone for their suggestions.
  • #26 17296245
    Gagatek77
    Level 15  
    [quote="kood"]
    Gagatek77 wrote:
    Kolego you really can't read with understanding, well I'm explaining again that control from the control panel and power not from its circuit and this does not preclude the use of a buffer power supply with battery.


    Now you're turning the cartoon on its head: first you write that the solenoid valve on 12 V is bad and that it should be connected to 230 V, that's where the discussion started, now you're proposing a buffer power supply, probably a valve on 12 V.

    Gagatek77 wrote:
    By the way, how many times have you had to deal with this besides the described case of flooding ?
    .

    Buddy, at the very beginning we were writing about valves for 230V, powered from the mains, and about such valves which during operation draw current in the closed/open state (not during closing/opening) depending on the power supply version. And such valves consume from, say, 7W to several watts during operation. With a monostable NC or NO valve on 12 V or 230 V there is no point in using such a valve, because during operation it would consume power all the time, thus generating costs and possible damage. Bistable valves, whether on 12 or 230V, need power supply only for the time of change of state from closed to open and vice versa. What do you not understand here? I have been writing all the time that the control of such a valve from the alarm is possible, but in the 12V version I would give a buffer power supply to not overload the system and to increase reliability. I hope my colleague finally understands this.
  • #27 17296319
    kood
    CCTV and Stationary Alarms specialist
    Gagatek77 wrote:
    Kolego at the very beginning we wrote about valves for 230V, powered from the mains, and about such valves which during operation draw current in the closed/open state (not during closing/opening) depending on the power supply version. And such valves draw from, say, 7W to several watts during operation. With a monostable NC or NO valve on 12 V or 230 V, the use of a monostable valve is pointless, because during operation it would consume power all the time, which means it generates costs and can be damaged. Bistable valves, whether on 12 or 230V, need power only for the time of the change of state from closed to open and vice versa.


    Why are you explaining this to me again, I understand it perfectly, and I have been writing from the beginning about a valve that only draws current when it is working, nowhere did I write that I meant another one. I'm just trying to explain to you that a 230V valve doesn't make sense because of the emergency power supply in the absence of main power.

    jajen wrote:
    Power shortages at my place are either non-existent or sporadic (2-3 per year). Secondly, I find it hard to believe that such a coincidence would cause the water system to fail just when there is no power. I would have to be extremely unlucky.

    It is not the case that a water system failure should occur when there is no electricity, it could be that a water system failure will cause an electrical system failure because, as you know, electricity and water do not like each other, and then you know. If you are doing it for yourself, you can do it, and if something happens, you bear the risk, but if you are doing it professionally for money, you should think about it a bit more.
  • #28 17296339
    jajen
    Level 17  
    kood wrote:
    It is not the case that a water system failure should occur when there is no electricity, it could be that a water system failure will cause an electrical system failure because, as you know, electricity and water do not like each other, and then you know.


    Apparently so, but in practice this won't occur because once the alarm is armed (and at the point of arming it I can see if I have a flooded house or not) it doesn't matter if there is electricity or not and what triggers the outage because the valve is closed and lack of electricity won't change that. So I guess it's a bit of an academic discussion. The only time there might be a problem is if a valve fails to close during a set-up due to a failure of the valve itself, but that could be the case with any valve and a 12v buffer won't change that.
  • #29 17296680
    kood
    CCTV and Stationary Alarms specialist
    jajen wrote:
    (and at the time of arming this I can see if I have a flooded house or not)
    .

    I don't know what kind of house you have and what you see and what you don't see when arming the alarm, I just warned of a situation I encountered also these are not theoretical considerations.

    jajen wrote:
    the only time there could be a problem is if a valve fails to close during arming due to a failure of the valve itself, but this could apply to any valve and a 12v buffer will not change this.
    .

    therefore I am in favour of feeding the signal from the limiters to the inputs of the control panel and installing flooding detectors which are configured in a separate zone and resetting the alarm from these detectors with a different password than the one used to arm the alarm and of course notifying the phone if flooding is detected. Then you know about the damage to the valve beforehand, if a pipe bursts the detector detects flooding it closes the electro-valve and does not open it until you consciously enter the password to cancel the flooding alarm. And you don't have to shut off the water in the building every time the alarm is armed, so you can set the washing machine or dishwasher before you leave.
  • #30 17416158
    merchel
    Level 11  
    kood wrote:
    e.g. of such:
    Which ball valve control to choose for an alarm system? .


    .
    .

    Fellow kood , which exact ball valves with limiters are you using ? I have had a cursory look and it looks like the 7-wire valves have additional limit switches. The 3-wire ones also have one you would have to connect to after unscrewing the valve. I would like to confirm the actual position of the valve to Satel's Integra control panel, because as you yourself rightly pointed out that giving an open or close signal is not always equivalent to its execution. I intend to connect wired flood detectors to the control panel and use them to control the ball valve, additionally also when arming the alarm.
    For the time being, I have bought the ball valve alone , because temporarily they do not have a 7-wire version https://washservice.pl/pl/p/Zawor-kulowy-nierdzewny-1-cal-DN25-pod-silownik-ISO5211/123.
    Delivery is expected in 3 weeks. Then I will buy the control unit itself.

Topic summary

The discussion focuses on selecting the appropriate ball valve control for integration with an alarm system to shut off water when armed and open it when disarmed. Two main valve control types are compared: two-point and three-point control. Three-point valves use one neutral (N) wire and two live (L) wires for opening and closing, drawing power only during state changes, which reduces continuous current consumption and heat generation. Two-point valves often draw current continuously in one position, leading to higher power dissipation and potential overheating. Solenoid valves, typically monostable NO or NC types, also draw current continuously when in one state, which can be inefficient and cause heating.

The preferred solution is a three-point ball valve with limit switches to provide feedback on valve position to the alarm control panel, enhancing reliability and enabling fault detection. Power supply considerations include using 12V DC valves powered independently from the alarm panel to avoid battery drain during power outages, or 230V AC valves with manual bypass valves for emergency water access. The importance of manual override in case of power failure is emphasized. Flood detectors integrated with the alarm system can provide additional protection by triggering valve closure upon water detection, with separate alarm zones and distinct reset codes.

The discussion also covers practical aspects such as valve sizing (e.g., 1¼ inch valves), power consumption (typically 7-12W during operation), and the trade-offs between complexity, reliability, and cost. Some users recommend simplifying the system to increase reliability, avoiding complex UPS or large battery setups. Examples of valves with 7-wire or 3-wire configurations and limit switches are mentioned, with links to commercial products. The final solution adopted by the original poster involves a 230V three-wire valve with limiters, controlled by the alarm panel, and a manual bypass valve for emergencies.

Additional points include the impact of valve operation on water supply hose integrity, with motorized ball valves preferred over solenoids to avoid hydraulic hammer. The discussion also touches on powering valves from alarm panel outputs, with caution advised to avoid overloading the panel battery. Overall, the consensus favors three-point controlled motorized ball valves with limit switches, powered independently, integrated with flood sensors and manual overrides for robust water shut-off in alarm systems.
Summary generated by the language model.
ADVERTISEMENT