UNI-T UT33B - "Cheap / Dear" - multimeter with backlight and HOLD func
Recently, a few people from our forum ordered the UNI-T UT33 multimeter, which I learned from the thread Gadgetomania - gadgets Electrodes for points . As literally a few days earlier I got such a multimeter (version with the letter "B" at the end) from a friend, because he was in arrears, and he himself had no idea how to use such a contraption, I asked in the above-mentioned thread if you want me reviewed it to you. The response was positive so let's begin.
At the beginning, a curiosity about the price. Well, brothers from China, you can buy such a multimeter for $ 14.99, which today translates into almost fifty-seven Polish zlotys

While on Allegro, you can buy it for less than 30 zlotys, including shipping.

However, if you need several pieces, you can buy five pieces for the same price on Aliexpress
You should add shipping costs of $ 8.88, which is thirty-three zlotys with pennies, so it comes out for a total of less than twelve zlotys per item
.

I received the meter, "bare", but as you can see in the screenshots, the set includes only test leads, which I do not miss.
See how this multimeter looks like. I also did not fail to look inside.



This meter does not have many functions, nor does it have the "most important" one, but it has three redundant ones.
But let's start from the beginning, that is with the technical data and specifications:
Model: UT33B
DC Voltage (V): 200mV, 2000mV, 20V, 200V +- (0.5% + 2) / 500V +- (0.8% + 2)
AC Voltage (V): 200V / 500V +- (1.2% + 10)
DC Current (A): 200uA +- (1% + 2) / 200mA +- (1.2 + 2) / 10A +- (2% + 5)
Resistance (?
: 200? +- (0.8% + 5) / 2000?, 20K?, 200K? +- (0.8% + 2) / 20M? +- (1% + 5)
Battery test: 1.5V, 9V, 12V
I have no idea why the manufacturer wasted three "fields on the selector" and put these battery tests, not only that the results are the same as in the 20VDC range, but according to the table below, the accuracy is worse than in the 20VDC range.

But the table is the table, and the measurement results speak for themselves.
I started my tests by measuring the current. The already known current source (5-20mA) was used as a reference. Well, we have a problem at the beginning. In the mile ampere range, it looked like this.

As you can see, failure all along. So let's see if it happened. suitable for something in the 10A range.

It's much better here. I do not exclude that my copy is damaged (in the range of 200mA), after all, I received it as used, from a person for whom it is a device straight from space.
So let's check how it works in the measurement of DC voltage. The reference voltage you already know will be used for the test.

It is not bad here, for a measure of this class, the results are absolutely correct.
Just for formalities, I will throw in a photo of the 230V mains voltage measurement

And it's time to move on to the resistance measurement tests. Here, I will use a recently purchased set of nine resistors with a tolerance of 0.1% (zero point one percent).



I have no objections here.
Now let's go back to the useless functions in my opinion. I mean 1.5V battery test; 9V and 12V. It is no different from measuring with a multimeter in the 20V range. Due to these stupid "gadgets" we lose as many as three useful fields on the dial. Half the trouble, if it was on the principle "there are all the necessary functions, we will fill the circle". Unfortunately this is not the case. This multimeter does not have the most important function a multimeter can have. HE HAS NO "Beep" (beep, buzzer, buzzer). When I undressed it, I was hoping to find a place for this unfortunate piszczyk and to be able to add it on my own. Unfortunately, I did not find any place where I could connect
.
After all, you might think that this multimeter has more disadvantages than advantages, but ...
This baby has two advantages. First of all, the most ordinary MECHANICAL backlight switch / switch, so it will not go out in the least expected moment.
Secondly, it has a mechanical HOLD button and thus remembers the value of the last measurement (if, of course, it was turned on before).
All in all, this is one of those multimeters that I wouldn't have had if someone gave it to me. To put it more bluntly, I wouldn't buy that crap
. But since I have it, it will definitely come in handy ...
Best regards.
CMS
EDIT: 02/06/2019, 19:30:
I decided to add here the results of additional tests / measurements that I did on your requests.
I have retested and return my honor. The milliammeter is working properly.


And another test ...
Well, you learn all your life. As I said, I had not dealt with a battery test in a multimeter before and for this the previous measurement, in which I used a fully charged 1.2V battery, was incorrect.
It turns out that, as you thought, the meter introduces a load on the battery test range. I am enclosing new tests on used batteries.

12V battery

9V battery

1.5V battery
Well, how he shot the face
.
As you can see in the photos above, in the case of used batteries, the measurement result in the 20V range is different than in the range dedicated to a specific battery.
However, I still feel that this feature is unnecessary.
At the beginning, a curiosity about the price. Well, brothers from China, you can buy such a multimeter for $ 14.99, which today translates into almost fifty-seven Polish zlotys


While on Allegro, you can buy it for less than 30 zlotys, including shipping.

However, if you need several pieces, you can buy five pieces for the same price on Aliexpress



I received the meter, "bare", but as you can see in the screenshots, the set includes only test leads, which I do not miss.
See how this multimeter looks like. I also did not fail to look inside.







This meter does not have many functions, nor does it have the "most important" one, but it has three redundant ones.
But let's start from the beginning, that is with the technical data and specifications:
Model: UT33B
DC Voltage (V): 200mV, 2000mV, 20V, 200V +- (0.5% + 2) / 500V +- (0.8% + 2)
AC Voltage (V): 200V / 500V +- (1.2% + 10)
DC Current (A): 200uA +- (1% + 2) / 200mA +- (1.2 + 2) / 10A +- (2% + 5)
Resistance (?

Battery test: 1.5V, 9V, 12V
I have no idea why the manufacturer wasted three "fields on the selector" and put these battery tests, not only that the results are the same as in the 20VDC range, but according to the table below, the accuracy is worse than in the 20VDC range.

But the table is the table, and the measurement results speak for themselves.
I started my tests by measuring the current. The already known current source (5-20mA) was used as a reference. Well, we have a problem at the beginning. In the mile ampere range, it looked like this.




As you can see, failure all along. So let's see if it happened. suitable for something in the 10A range.




It's much better here. I do not exclude that my copy is damaged (in the range of 200mA), after all, I received it as used, from a person for whom it is a device straight from space.
So let's check how it works in the measurement of DC voltage. The reference voltage you already know will be used for the test.




It is not bad here, for a measure of this class, the results are absolutely correct.
Just for formalities, I will throw in a photo of the 230V mains voltage measurement

And it's time to move on to the resistance measurement tests. Here, I will use a recently purchased set of nine resistors with a tolerance of 0.1% (zero point one percent).









I have no objections here.
Now let's go back to the useless functions in my opinion. I mean 1.5V battery test; 9V and 12V. It is no different from measuring with a multimeter in the 20V range. Due to these stupid "gadgets" we lose as many as three useful fields on the dial. Half the trouble, if it was on the principle "there are all the necessary functions, we will fill the circle". Unfortunately this is not the case. This multimeter does not have the most important function a multimeter can have. HE HAS NO "Beep" (beep, buzzer, buzzer). When I undressed it, I was hoping to find a place for this unfortunate piszczyk and to be able to add it on my own. Unfortunately, I did not find any place where I could connect

After all, you might think that this multimeter has more disadvantages than advantages, but ...
This baby has two advantages. First of all, the most ordinary MECHANICAL backlight switch / switch, so it will not go out in the least expected moment.
Secondly, it has a mechanical HOLD button and thus remembers the value of the last measurement (if, of course, it was turned on before).
All in all, this is one of those multimeters that I wouldn't have had if someone gave it to me. To put it more bluntly, I wouldn't buy that crap

Best regards.
CMS
EDIT: 02/06/2019, 19:30:
I decided to add here the results of additional tests / measurements that I did on your requests.
I have retested and return my honor. The milliammeter is working properly.




And another test ...
Well, you learn all your life. As I said, I had not dealt with a battery test in a multimeter before and for this the previous measurement, in which I used a fully charged 1.2V battery, was incorrect.
It turns out that, as you thought, the meter introduces a load on the battery test range. I am enclosing new tests on used batteries.


12V battery


9V battery


1.5V battery
tytka wrote:When measuring in the 1.5V range, it is about 21.5mA
Well, how he shot the face

As you can see in the photos above, in the case of used batteries, the measurement result in the 20V range is different than in the range dedicated to a specific battery.
However, I still feel that this feature is unnecessary.
Comments
@CMS I also agree, I would never buy this multimeter, it is a waste of money for this crap. [Read more]
Hello dear colleagues. I noticed in the photos that my dear CMS colleague was testing the ammeter with the 200mA range on, and the cable was connected to the 10A connector, this is a wrong connection.... [Read more]
Congratulations on your perceptiveness. 500 points flies to you. I did make a mistake. This happens when you write three articles about three multimeters at once. I'll do a retest tomorrow. [Read more]
I was about to write about it. :) However, you should forgive your colleague this mistake because it is already the 2nd review within a few days. It does not change the fact that the multimeter is bad.... [Read more]
It seems to me that the meter is dedicated to Sunday DIY enthusiasts since there is a battery test out there, it can serve as a bait for a potential layman buyer. [Read more]
I dare to notice that the meter does not even have a fuse in the 10A range !!! [Read more]
Most cheap meters don't have it. But it's not a problem. In case of trouble, the metal plate that goes from the connector to the solder pad usually burns, and it can be easily repaired or stre... [Read more]
I have retested and return my honor. The milliammeter is working properly. https://obrazki.elektroda.pl/8086240800_1549356367_thumb.jpg https://obrazki.elektroda.pl/5999554600_1549356332_thumb.jpg... [Read more]
So UNI-T defended itself. :) It does not change the fact that this meter, due to its limited functions, is intended for very beginner users, as evidenced by the battery measurement function. [Read more]
To be honest, I had a bit of fun reading these words. The UT-33 models are available in "A", "B", "C" and "D" versions. Of which only the "B" version does not have a "beeper", but it has a battery tester.... [Read more]
Then read comprehension next time. [Read more]
There is a version with the letter "D" (UT33D) - and this one has a "pipczyk" function and a generator output (probably 50Hz, rarely useful in my opinion, but it is). It costs about PLN 35-40 in PL, so... [Read more]
Sorry, my mistake. I read it with understanding, only a little bit on my head and I missed it. But the mere fact of chiding this version for the lack of a "beep" is a bit of a misnomer. While this... [Read more]
And could I ask you to check: does the "battery tester" function burden the battery with some resistance? Measuring the battery voltage with a voltmeter says nothing about discharge when this is open... [Read more]
But maybe it's not just a measurement, but maybe there is some load there to take e.g. 10mA from the battery therefore 3 ranges, because for each resistor a different resistor, then this measurement... [Read more]
From what I remember (because I used to play with such a meter), with the battery tester function, it loaded the battery and the results were different than with the voltmeter function (unless the battery... [Read more]
I would treat it as a warning, attention rather than rebuke. To be honest, I did not even know that there are different versions of this measure (I got mine from my employer, I didn't even investigate). ... [Read more]
The "A" version (the most expensive), has automatic range swap and 4 full digits on the display (ranges seem to be up to 4000, not 1999). [Read more]
In my opinion, it is perfect for throwing it into the car's glove compartment so that it lies in the event of a wu :D ) [Read more]