pokmijn wrote:In this country, people are thinking, not idiots. There is an old adage: "When you can not read, don't push your poster".At the time of listing on both portals, the equipment is mine. I have the right to do this. I can see that in a country where there is a fictitious ownership, I will not find many people who will understand my point of view.
You don't have a "point of view" but a "point of distortion".
You don't understand the basics of trading.
The basic mistake is Your ownership . You transfer your property rights to the portal, be it Allegro or olx, etc., it is an instruction based on the regulations of a given portal, which you yourself accept in advance. You have no ownership right at the time the goods are listed. This right of ownership can come back to you after an unsold auction, or withdrawn if the temporary holder of the right, in which case the portal agrees, when someone pays, the holder of these rights passes it to the buyer and the goods are his property. You just don't understand the basics! In fact, a commodity is not traded, but property rights to it. Whoever acquires the rights, has to have the goods and therefore you have to send them after the auction. A friend of yours wrote well:
clubber84 wrote:Who normally drives the car put up for sale at the auction, knowing the rules of its operation?
And that's the truth. Because the goods put up for auction should be left untouched and wait for the end of the auction. An auction is a freezing of property rights for the duration of the auction. You agreed to it yourself.
According to your "point of distortion" and willingness to profit, e.g. PLN 400
pokmijn wrote:How would you buy, for example, a TV, pay the PLN 3000, a few days pass, you are already sitting and watching yourself at home with your brother-in-law, the match is on, you are brewing in your hand and here the previous owner comes in, throws PLN 3000 on the table and collects the TV, because He has just found a client on this TV, which gives PLN 3500 right away. Well, it's all right, because I give you the money.Well, it's better to have an extra 400 than not to have.
You will find yourself another TV for this money. Does it suit you?
Or rather in this situation you call the cops and defend the TV because it is yours? (On purpose I do not write about variant "B", that is you and brother-in-law ... and slightly on "phase" "you gently ask the previous owner or he leaves your premises through the window. After all, we live in a law-abiding country).