logo elektroda
logo elektroda
X
logo elektroda

A big test of small antennas for amateur handheld radios 2m / 70cm

djbpm 

Hello everyone.
Recently, I have measured several dozen handheld antennas and 3 car antennas in the amateur 2m and 70cm ranges in an amateur way.
Here is the list:

01 Retevis RHD771 (2.15dBi) Aliexpress RETEVIS Official Store
03 Nagoya NA-771 (2.15dBi) Aliexpress?
07 Yaesu VX-6R Factory attached to the radio
08 Wouxun KG-UV8D Factory attached to the radio
09 Harvest RH660S (3.0 / 5.0 dBi) Aliexpress BlueRadio store
09skr as above but it was only extended to work at 70 cm
partially so that the SWR is approx.
as above
10 Self-made on the pattern 771 Sam robilem
11 Diamond NR-770H (3.0/5.5dBi) InRadio
12 Nagoya NL-770H (3,0/5,5 dBi) HamRadioShop
13 Nagoya NL-770R (3,0/5,5 dBi) HamRadioShop
14 Nagoya NA-666 (2.15 dBi) ?
15th Nagoya NA-771 (2.15dBi) ?
16 Baofeng BFG-A-3 ?
17 Baofeng UV-3 Fabryczna dołączona do radiotelefonu
18 ICOM FA-S270C Factory attached to the ICOM E90 radio
19 Baofeng DM5 Factory attached to the radio
twenty Baofeng UV5 Factory attached to the radio
21 Nagoya NA-771 ?
22 Kenwood KRA-23M factory included with the NX-200 radio
23 Kenwood TH-D74 Factory attached to the radio
24 Yaesu FT-5D Factory attached to the radio
25 Anytone 878 Factory attached to the radio
26 Alinco DJ-G7 Factory attached to the radio
27 Yaesu VX-2 Factory attached to the radio
28 ICOM MARINE? Factory attached to the marine radiotelephone
29 Kenwood NX-320 E2 (KRA-27?) 70cm Factory attached to the radio
thirty ? Miniature something at 70cm Aliexpress
31 Sagem 70cm ?
32 Yaesu Standard Horizon CAT-460 Factoryattached to the radio
33 MDVM HS DUAL Factory attached to the hotspot
35 Diamond RH-771 ?
36 Nagoya NA-771 ?
37 Nagoya NA-701 ?
38 ? without description, base similar to Wouxun ?
While the originality of the antennas included in the factory with the equipment does not raise any doubts, it can be different with each other. If I was sure that a given antenna is a counterfeit, it would be marked.



The measurement was carried out in 4 rounds, in which I measured the S1P parameters (including SWR) and the signal level emitted from each of the antennas under field conditions.

S1P measurements with the NanoVNA-H4 analyzer:
1. Antenna placed directly on the NanoVNA-H4, and measurement with the Analyzer in the hand, close to the head, held like a handheld transceiver.
NanoVNA calibration took place directly on its socket in the frequency ranges 120 to 170 MHz and 400 to 470 MHz
2. Antenna on the base with counterweights and NanoVNA measurement.

NanoVNA calibration was done on the base slot, eliminating the influence of the adapters used to connect the base. Ranges as above. If the antenna required an additional adapter, then this adapter was not calibrated, so the SMA barrel extends the line by 155 picoseconds, and the SMA - UC1 socket is 327 picoseconds, and this UC1 adapter has 43 ohms of wave impedance. The influence of these adapters is noticeable in the 70cm band, especially on the Smith chart, but it is not big and for the purposes of this test it can be omitted.

Signal level measurements:
3. Antenna on Yaesu VX-6 handheld radio and signal level measurement on base station.
4. Antenna on a base with counterweights and a base on a Yaesu VX-6 and measuring the signal level on the base station.
Measurements 3 and 4 were carried out at a distance of 185 meters from the base antenna, in an urban area, in a densely built-up housing estate, but in the field of optical visibility of the antennas. I walked about 15 meters with the PTT pressed at full power and the device at my head, just like I would normally use it to make communications. I tried to keep the device as vertical as possible so that the polarities of the antennas were consistent. There were no obstacles on the walking route in the immediate vicinity. In the case of walking with the counterweight base, these counterweights were placed a few cm above the head, so then the antenna was about 30cm higher than when broadcasting without counterweights, which could have a false positive effect in favor of the counterbalance system.
At the base station, the signal was picked up by a Diamond X50N antenna installed about 10 meters higher than the towel rail, giving an angle of 3.1 degrees. The signal came through a 10 dB attenuator, an RTL-SDR tuner working with the SDR ++ application, set to minimum gain, all AGC off, sampling 1536 kHz, division / 8 giving 192 kHz. The spectrum was recorded to an IQ .wav file. The center frequency of the SDR was set 50 kHz higher than the handheld transmitter, and as a result, the recording showed a carrier signal with a frequency of 50 kHz. The recording was filtered with a 49 kHz - 51 kHz bandpass filter. After such a cleaned recording, the noise level was -59 dB. 0dB is the SDR overload level, so the results are in the range of -59 dB is the minimum level to 0 dB is the maximum level (they are negative).
Each antenna transmitted for about 15-20 seconds, and from this time the average RMS level expressed in dB was calculated.
An example recording chart opened in an audio processing program looks like this:



There are clear differences between the individual antennas. I've already selected sample 35 on it, then zoom in:



and I mark precisely the beginning and the end. You can see here that the signal level fluctuates as it travels. Then I use the statistical analysis function which gives me this information:

Screenshot from signal statistics software showing average RMS power indicated at -18.99 dB.

I am writing back Average RMS Power.
The measurements with the hand towel were performed on the frequencies 144.9875 MHz and 434.9875 MHz.
Measurements made from antenna No. 14 took place only without counterweights.

Results for the 2m band:
number Antenna Signature level
out of hand
SWR
out of hand
Impedance Signal on
counterweights
SWR from pw The impedance from the
01 Retevis RHD771 -22.24 4.10 29.55 -55.18i -13.27 5.31 10.23-14.47i
03 Nagoya NA-771 -21.94 3.83 49.01-71.55i -12.63 3.66 15.37-16.83i
07 Yaesu VX-6R -25 4,61 29,72 -61,55i -19,7 5,74 09,87 -17,92i
08 Wouxun KG-UV8D -26,5 7,11 31,67 -89,32i -26,91 18,19 06,68 -59,56i
09 Harvest RH660S -9,88 1,02 50,73 00,60i -7,82 1,07 52,39 -02,17i
10 Samoróbka 771 -18,52 1,22 57,99 06,95i -17,91 6,95 166.82 -169,83i
11 Diamond NR-770H -8 1,23 51,12 10,63i -6,44 1,16 48,04 07,10i
12 Nagoya NL-770H -11,59 1,79 68,49 -29,26i -9,59 1,78 64,28 -29,83i
13 Nagoya NL-770R -8,36 1,52 33,20 -03,87i -6,55 1,41 36,06 04,67i

number Antena Poziom sign.
z ręki
SWR
z ręki
Impedancja
14 Nagoya NA-666 -30,18 7,85 26,56 -85,99i
15th Nagoya NA-771 -21,19 1,92 59,32 -34,85i
16 Baofeng BFG-A-3 -26,68 3,00 18,05 13,46i
17 Baofeng UV-3 -28,78 4,43 17,65 -35,98i
18 ICOM FA-S270C -26,87 3,96 31,44 -56,04i
19 Baofeng DM5 -24,97 1,88 27,22 -06,15i
20 Baofeng UV5 -27,9 3,04 20,18 -22,07i
21 Nagoya NA-771 -24,68 3,79 43,70 -66,72i
23 Kenwood TH-D74 -28,34 6,33 30,94 -81,16i
24 Yaesu FT-5D -23,54 1,13 53,18 -05,61i
25 Anytone AT-D878 -24,11 1,37 43,23 -13,06i
26 Alinco DJ-G7 3pasma -26,69 3,63 69,47 -78,97i
27 Yaesu VX-2 -25,88 1,90 43,98 -29,96i
28 ICOM MARINE -29,62 7,75 27,11 -86,30i
32 Yaesu Standard Horizon -29.99 11,44 23,36 -102,08i
34 Astro 320 127cm -14,99 2,59 96,68 -50,43i
35 Diamond RH-771 -18,99 1,72 85,63 05,67i
36 Nagoya NA-771 -21,79 3,61 49,37 -68,29i
37 Nagoya NA-701 -24,08 3,09 40,51 -52,58i
38 Wouxun? -22.1 1.99 79.59 32.86i


Due to the fact that the negative units of the signal level are not very intuitive, for the purposes of the graph, I added +31 dB to each antenna so that all the results were positive.


Results for the 70cm band:
number Antenna Signature level
out of hand
SWR
out of hand
Impedance Signal on
counterweights
SWR from pw The impedance from the
01 Retevis RHD771 -11.83 1.57 64.47 21.41i -14.45 1.66 63.37 25.36i
03 Nagoya NA-771 -15.59 2.47 99.53 -43.50i -15.25 2,01 91,23 -24,50i
07 Yaesu VX-6R -19,44 3,27 36,61 -51,99i -18,64 4,53 14,80 -28,28i
08 Wouxun KG-UV8D -18,59 3,31 108,81 -72,83i -14,2 1,23 59,70 05,76i
09 Harvest RH660S -14,54 1,31 63,95 -06,13i -14,62 1,37 64,10 -10.95i
09skr Harvest RH660S skrócona -14,02 1,01 49,35 00,10i -13,79 1,04 51,90 -00,49i
10 Samoróbka 771 -11,98 1,27 39,66 -01,93i -13,13 1,45 34,67 02,63i
11 Diamond NR-770H -11,21 1,06 51,88 02,60i -10,52 1,22 42,50 -05,09i
12 Nagoya NL-770H -13,61 1,63 30,6101.14i -11.59 1.85 27.22 -03.46i
13 Nagoya NL-770R -20.55 2.36 50.72-44.59i -13.86 2.51 27.21 -26.67i

number Antenna Signature level
out of hand
SWR
out of hand
Impedance
14 Nagoya NA-666 -19.85 5.82 121.36-138.41i
15 Nagoya NA-771 -18.07 5.02 244,36 -39,54i
16 Baofeng BFG-A-3 -20,47 1,70 55,85 -27,88i
17 Baofeng UV-3 -17,28 1,20 54,95 07,97i
18 ICOM FA-S270C -22,52 3,38 30,10 -46,16i
19 Baofeng DM5 -16,61 1,72 85,59 05,65i
20 Baofeng UV5 -16,63 1,74 83,53 -13,37i
21 Nagoya NA-771 -21,74 6,69 23,39 -70,37i
22 Kenwood KRA-23? -18,64 2,06 70,31 -38,90i
23 Kenwood TH-D74 -22,65 3,07 38,17 -50,25i
24 Yaesu FT-5D -23,28 3,90 27,32 -49,26i
25 Anytone AT-D878 -17,8 1,95 76,32 -32,73i
26 Alinco DJ-G7 3pasma -23,07 2,42 40,57 -40,08i
27 Yaesu VX-2 -22,47 2,70 43,26 -47,67i
29 Kenwood KRA-27? -20,22 2,46 54,49 -48,29i
30 Miniaturowa -22,68 1,84 51,83 -31,57i
31 Sagem 70cm -21.9 3,71 183,21 -18,91i
33 MMDVM HS DUAL -19,83 1,39 47,75 16,04i
35 Diamond RH-771 -14,83 1,18 55,47 -06,71i
36 Nagoya NA-771 -18,74 3,49 39,18 -57,91i
37 Nagoya NA-701 -20,41 3,66 48,98 -68,74i
38 Wouxun? -19,08 3,19 57,18 -65,15i

Tu również dodałem +31 dB.

Conclusions:
- The handheld radio must be able to withstand a very high SWR.
- Handheld antennas of an acceptable length work much better in the 70 cm band than in the 2 m band.
- The difference in the signal level in the 2m band between the weakest antenna and the strongest one was 23.72dB. So we would have to use 236 watts from the weakest antenna to get the same signal level from 1 (ONE) watt from the strongest. For the record decibel calculator
- The typical "gain" of a handheld antenna in the 2m band is strongly negative and is in the range of -10 to -20 dBi.
- Counterweights help greatly in the 2m band, while their use with a towel is impractical.
- Telescopic antennas, especially the long ones, are very effective, but they break down quickly and can crackle. Example of Astro 320:

Finally, here are the Smith and SWR charts:

01 03 07:


08 09 10:


11 12 13:


14 15 16:


17 18 19:


20 21 22:


23 24 25:


26 27 28:


29 30 31:


32 33 34:


35 36 37:


38:


I wish you distant communications
djbpm

About Author
djbpm
djbpm wrote 568 posts with rating 147 , helped 71 times. Live in city -. Been with us since 2003 year.

Comments

zgierzman 01 Jul 2022 23:33

You know, I've read a bit about antennas, I get the decibels, I even have NanoVNA and can roughly use it. I studied your text three times before I understood enough to figure out what the author meant. ... [Read more]

ptero 02 Jul 2022 09:32

"How did you impress me" :) Now I am asking for a summary in Polish :) Now, as a less advanced one, I will ask which antenna for "baofeng" on 2m would you recommend? Regards [Read more]

Wikita 02 Jul 2022 11:57

From the author's comparison of 2 m, the best antenna is No. 11, ie Diamond NR-770H -> the variant without counterweights gives us as much as -8 dBFS on the receiver, with SWR = 1.23 (which is decent... [Read more]

djbpm 02 Jul 2022 14:14

Now that you know what's going on, maybe you can help write it in a simpler way? This is my first entry of this type, I am not a Polish teacher. I did not want this analysis to go to waste and only... [Read more]

sq3evp 04 Jul 2022 09:59

Congratulations on your willingness to conduct research. [Read more]

moon09 05 Jul 2022 13:15

Very good job, hats off :) [Read more]

tplewa 05 Jul 2022 14:56

Good job :) Interesting results, although in some cases predictable ;) Once Jarek SP3SWJ took measurements with his MAX 6 and the results were also interesting :) A big plus, because after all, it's... [Read more]

djbpm 06 Jul 2022 11:23

Predictably, but you were hoping to find something sensible up to half a meter. I tried to measure similarly and in the case of hand antennas it does not work, because the cables become a counterweight,... [Read more]

tplewa 06 Jul 2022 17:55

All in all, as I mentioned once, the measurements of Jarek SP3SWJ were visible, I accepted it myself and use Nagoya 701 (the stick knows if they are originals or fakes). Mainly due to the fact that a... [Read more]

BOOM i ZONK 06 Jul 2022 23:12

Do you know what I miss in this statement? Something as trivial as a tuned quarter-wave piece of wire just soldered into a plug. [Read more]

sq3evp 07 Jul 2022 08:15

Yes - such a simple basic antenna for comparison, such a simple "quarter". [Read more]

djbpm 07 Jul 2022 15:23

The reference antenna is usually a half-wave dipole. But maybe I will test something else. There will be what, there will be time, why not. Such a quarter is easy to make, but the quarters work very poorly... [Read more]

tplewa 07 Jul 2022 17:17

In the past, there were probably fewer fakes, now it is difficult to know what is original ... This NA-701 like the original bought in a store in PL where the seller claimed that the original (has a... [Read more]

djbpm 21 Jul 2022 12:07

Due to the fact that some people use stationary analyzers and try to connect manual antennas to such an analyzer with cables, I also did a test of how the antenna behaves when connected via a cable. Two... [Read more]

%}