bernanio wrote: In the case of American lines, there is no such diagnostic option, I do not even see the option of checking whether a given line is overloaded or earthed, since the power supply is medium phase and a hoop at the pole (still in a sandy area)
With this only grounding of the MV windings it is a bit of an exaggeration. SWER is mainly used in Australia, New Zealand and South Africa. It's rather rare in the US, maybe somewhere in Alaska.
If you look closely, you will notice that the MV networks usually work there as a 4-wire one, i.e. with an additional neutral wire, which is earthed from time to time. It happens that in areas where no one needs 3 phases (i.e. residential) MV lines are single-phase (1 phase and neutral).
This conductor usually hangs lower than the phase conductors, below the transformers.
The rest is correct - ground faults are seen by the security devices as a normal operating state and are rarely turned off, hence all these special effects in the event of a failure.
The centers of the transformers' secondary windings are connected to the same neutral. If the MV network works as a 3-wire network and the transformers are connected phase-to-phase on the primary side, then the neutral grounded conductor is also present, but there is no connection to the MV network and only serves the LV part.
rafbid wrote: I wonder how they deal with the symmetry of the network load with us, if someone wants to significantly increase the connection power, it is recommended to connect the power of niches to increase the power of one phase.
Standard home connection in the US is 2x120 / 240V with 200A main fuse. This is over 45 kW of connected power. If someone needs more, because, for example, he electrically heats a 600 m2 house or water in a swimming pool, 400A or 600A connections are also installed. The three phases do not apply in housing.
There is no problem with load asymmetry because these single-phase transformers on poles are connected to different MV phases.
By the way, the requirement in Poland of 3 phases with the power required by flats and houses (up to 20 kW) is stupid. Paradoxically, it is easier to maintain symmetry in the network at receivers with single-phase 100A connections than 3-phase 32A. With 3 phases, the energy supplier has no influence on the way the customer loads individual phases, while with the 1st phase, the customer can easily switch to another phase if necessary. There are also eternal problems with selectivity with such small pre-meter protections, there are also smaller short-circuit currents in the installation itself and there is no 400V anywhere (safety). A break in the N conductor at the client's place does not introduce asymmetry, because it would have to be interrupted only on the network. Plus, cheaper surge arresters (1-2 pole instead of 3-4) and disconnectors (1 pole instead of 3).