logo elektroda
logo elektroda
X
logo elektroda

Energy storage 18650 up to 24kWh class Paragon, Powerwall

remzibi 14889 142
ADVERTISEMENT
Treść została przetłumaczona polish » english Zobacz oryginalną wersję tematu
  • Home on laptop batteries 🙂 .
    DIY energy storage system from 18650 cells
    Usability testing of the eperimental-experimental 48V energy storage on 18650 cells completed.
    As an answer to the eternal question "what else would you build ?", I built a "Paragon" class energy storage inspired by Leszek Kwitek https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7a0CGuDVCBo.
    After 3 months of testing with half of the capacity filled (estimated actual capacity at the moment around 12kWh, once full it will be over 24kWh), the whole thing works sensationally 🙂 .
    All 18650 cells recycled. The storage after charging easily keeps the house for the next 2 cloudy days when the installation does not yield, if there are bright clouds then longer. With heavy use such as cooking dinner (induction cooker), teas, coffees, hoovering, hairdryer, my workshop work etc, the "holding" time is about 36 hours, after which it will switch to grid i.e. grid or sunshine comes out 🙂 .
    I make no secret of the fact that this is a job for the patient, the persistent and those with a clue. A time-consuming and labour-intensive challenge is the very process of recovering, selecting and testing 18650 cells, a separate elaboration could be written about this process.
    The cells were welded with a DIY welder assembled "on the cheap" from a microwave transformer with a universal controller, the construction of which I have described here https://www.elektroda.pl/rtvforum/topic4053341.html.
    The welding and printing hoof I designed can be downloaded here https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:6808297
    The storage works with a 5.5kW hybrid inverter and 4.7kW panels mounted vertically (an idea that works brilliantly), for the best yield in the autumn/winter/spring months when energy demand is greatest (including for reheating the house).
    In summary, this form of storage is very convenient for utility and service purposes (adding cells online, without shutting down), the temperature culture of operation is excellent, the current carrying capacity is seamless, where per cell the currents are in the order of 250-350mA, which will hopefully ensure a long life.
    Technikalia :
    - 14S , 48V , 40 strings x 6 cells (target)
    - Cell test : tested with LiitoKala Lii-500 chargers, they perform well in this regard
    - BMS: JK BMS 20S balancer 1A, very good device, I recommend, 1A can handle balancing without any problem
    - string batteries are selected and connected together with regard to capacity and internal resistance
    - fuses: 4A but I would now use 5-6A
    - operating thresholds of the cells: lower 3.3V , upper 4.13V, so with a margin (the settings take into account the inverter measurement error offset)
    - the middle 8 strings at the terminals have 8A fuses (2x4A) and the best cells are there
    - cyclic thermal imaging control, any anomalies are seen immediately but nothing happens
    - cost-wise: an unbeatable revelation 🙂
    - The welding and printing holder I designed is downloadable from thingiverse .
    I attach a couple of photos from construction and testing
    Energy storage system built from 18650 cells. Stacks of 18650 cells arranged on a table, prepared for building an energy storage system. Array of empty battery cell holders on a table fa7a1293
    The image shows battery modules on a foam substrate. Experimental energy storage made from 18650 cells mounted on a wall. .
    App screen monitoring energy storage with cell charge levels. Thermal image of an energy storage with 18650 cells Thermal image showing the temperature distribution of 18650 cells. Thermal image of an energy storage system based on 18650 cells. .

    EDIT
    I'm uploading additional descriptions from the Facebook discussion
    Question: Let us know what condition the cells you still need should be in - could they be used but still working, or could they already be old, weak, and you are somehow remanufacturing them?
    Answer: Cells should not be badly corroded (there are ways to get slightly corroded cells 🙂 ), besides, their condition before testing is irrelevant, they can be discharged to 0V, the initial condition is completely irrelevant to the quality of the cell and its wear - this will only become apparent after testing. Testing is the whole procedure to check the internal CID fuse, if the cell is completely discharged then "raise" it by 50-100mA to the catalogue threshold and after that charge with temperature control, discharge with temperature control, charge by 700mA with temperature control, measure the internal resistance, let it rest for about a month and measure again to assess possible self-discharge problems. If the cell passes all this procedure, it is suitable for storage 🙂 . If the cell has a damaged insulating sleeve then it is repackaged in new "clothing". And if it has some minor imperfections, then it is suitable for LED torches 🙂 .
    Experience shows that laptop cells have a lot of rejects and a large range of parameters (but it is possible to squeeze something out of them), and the best for recovery are damaged packs from e-bikes, scooters, boards, etc.

    Question: You have 5 batteries combined into one pack. My question is what happens if one battery out of these 5 makes a short circuit?
    Answer: This string with the 5'ohm already has a 6'ste cell added to it just like the rest of the strings, there are 6 everywhere. A short circuit doesn't happen so it doesn't and it's there, but if it does, it's a slow process and the cell will slowly get warmer than the others, which you can see right away on the thermal imaging camera, giving you a ton of time to replace it. But assuming it suddenly short-circuits, it will trip the CID fuse that is in each cell. Assuming the CID doesn't work it will discharge the other cells in the pack and of course my fuse put on the pack will work. Same if corrosion occurs and the electrolyte leaks/leaks. So much.
    BTW I've taken apart thousands of cells and unpacked hundreds of packs, and I've seen them in various states, rusted to the core, overflowing, falling apart, with beaten CID fuses (sometimes a whole pack of 50 or so cells had their CIDs beaten and went to waste), discharged to 0V etc. but I've never, I repeat NEVER found a cell that was short-circuited or short-circuited, nor any burnt out. That's basically as much of a quandary as what happens if it gets a short circuit 🙂 basically from a purely practical point of view it's the same dilemma as - what if granny had a moustache would she be a grandpa 🙂 and that's why I consider 18650 cells to be very safe.


    Comment from FB:
    Comments by "łolabogaspalisiejakkamiennaawPoznan" for 3.... 2... 1...
    -
    Hehe good :) , a rash of "trolls" "pyromaniacs" "firefighters" frothing and bludgeoning endlessly, on such a topic is inevitable :) .


    Diagram of the warehouse, connection to the BMS
    Wiring diagram for 14S BMS and energy storage connection. .


    Update 05.2025
    For over a month now, the storage has completely paid for itself, so after a full financial 'blip', everything is now going to the upside. Current capacity around 20kWh.
    As befits an experimental storage facility - the experiment continues - and continues to run :) .

    Next information , sometime in March I noticed that some of the cell sockets from one batch started to crack after a while, so within two weeks (fortunately these were weeks of total sunlessness) the storage was rebuilt to mechanically prevent this kind of fault in the future. The cracked sockets were replaced. The sockets which have the print on them are OK and nothing happens to them, but the ones from the Chinese supplier which do not have such prints and numbers - have started to break, so I LOSE to the quality of some Chinese stuff.
    Below are pics of how they break down and how I rebuilt the stock (disassembly/disassembly was one afternoon - I was surprised myself at how quickly something can be taken apart :) ).

    Close-up of a damaged plastic battery holder for cylindrical cells, visible crack on the left side. Close-up of a cracked battery holder slot in a plastic cell holder. .

    Wooden energy storage frame with rows of black plastic battery holders, two white containers with additional connectors on the surface. Rows of black battery cells connected with copper busbars, arranged on a wooden background. .


    By the way, I am throwing in an example of a cell caught during a periodic thermal imaging inspection, a point of higher temperature by 3 degrees relative to the background, a cell that got a slight leak (after removing the tee shirt, I found a tiny electrolyte leak, a droplet). There was still a long way to go before such a cell was destroyed, maybe 3-6 months, but the thermal imaging had already caught the "dude" early enough - the cell was of course replaced immediately (without shutting down the storage), service-wise the design works.
    Here the thought really comes to mind that if the factory packs were not sealed and people/users were able to check with thermal imaging, the number of different "accidents" could be significantly reduced.

    Thermal image of a battery cell with a local temperature rise up to 25.5°C against a background of about 23°C. Thermal image of a single cell showing a hot spot with a temperature of 21.8°C.

    Cool? Ranking DIY
    About Author
    remzibi
    Level 24  
    Offline 
    remzibi wrote 1385 posts with rating 866, helped 34 times. Live in city Rumia. Been with us since 2002 year.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #2 21276302
    gulson
    System Administrator
    Revelation, we have it all:
    - recovery of old cells
    - free energy
    - independence
    - ecology

    This is the trend, so my advice is to slowly get used to energy storage in homes and even flats.
    They will simply force us to do so with further increases.
    It is even possible that we will have storage facilities without having to install panels, just to take energy when prices are negative and use it in the evenings.
    We will install such installations for ourselves. All the energy production will go to EjAja (AI) anyway and not for Kowalski to warm his tea.
    AI will pay well for every kWh and the poor Kowalski will not.
    That's how they got us...
    But we have to cope and very well you do.

    Just out of curiosity, aren't you afraid of some kind of fire? All in all 18650s are very safe, but it always comes to my mind like that.

    I'll send something small from myself, thanks again for the presentation!
  • #3 21276340
    BANANvanDYK
    Level 42  
    gulson wrote:
    I advise slowly getting used to energy storage in homes and even flats.
    .
    Rather not in flats.
    After a fire in an apartment building in Poznan, critical voices were raised:
    - Is it safe to charge battery-powered devices in flats (houses/multi-family blocks).
    - Whether it is safe to store batteries in basements of houses, along with other rubbish.
    - Can lithium-ion batteries be accessed in lifts?
    Regarding the topic. I note that the whole thing is mounted on a combustible surface (chipboard). The whole thing should be protected from touch. Ideally, it should be protected from unauthorised persons, especially those who are too curious, as they may kindly report.
  • #4 21276360
    gulson
    System Administrator
    For now, these are voices, there is no legislation.
    And the trend will continue.
    Anyway.... let there be cheap energy, then no one will entertain such things.

    "Electricity is ubiquitous in unlimited quantities and can power the machinery of the world without the need for coal, gas or other fuels."
    Nikola Tesla.
  • #5 21276390
    remzibi
    Level 24  
    gulson wrote:
    Revelation, we have it all:
    - recovery of old cells
    - free energy
    - independence
    - ecology

    This is the trend, .....
    This is how they got us...
    ................
    Just out of curiosity, aren't you afraid of some kind of fire? All in all, 18650s are very safe, but it always comes over my head like that........


    Thanks for the good word :) .
    - Through recovery, the cost of acquisition is acceptable.
    - The government (everyone) hates people having something for nothing, there are already plans to tax even garden gnomes - such a luxury :) .
    - Independence is very important, especially when potentially some rocket could fall on a nearby switchyard.
    - Yes, it's ecological that these cells don't go into the rubbish but will still serve, BTW the ones I discard are disposed of as needed and don't go to landfill.

    I am not afraid of Li-Ion18650 cells they are extremely safe, especially with the ability to check with thermal imaging at any time, but I am afraid of Li-Pol'i (I have experience from modelling) that is why I would not do it on Li-Pol's.
    I have been using recycled 18650 for over 20 years, for various applications and devices. The prerequisite is cell control, i.e. BMS, balancers and correct CC/CV chargers.
    Problems arise precisely from lack of control, closed cases, overloads, overheating, sensor failures, bad or failing chargers, etc.
    This storage unit just happens to be in such a concrete room under the (concrete) stairs.

    In general, if one is afraid, I recommend not having a storage facility, taking electricity from the power station and that's it :) .
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #6 21276391
    jajacek44
    Level 25  
    The late Nicola was both a genius and a moron or technical moron .
    For example, he connected himself to the earth by blowing up a power station (there were no fuses yet)
  • #7 21276398
    sq3evp
    Level 37  
    Someone has finally made a magazine a'la "Paragon".

    Nikola was a non-secure-for-business visionary - if there was free unlimited energy then there would be redundant politicians :)
  • #8 21276460
    Frog_Qmak
    Level 25  
    remzibi wrote:
    .
    I am not afraid of Li-Ion18650 cells they are extremely safe, especially with the ability to control with thermal imaging at any time, but I am afraid of Li-Pol'i (I have experience from modelling) therefore on Li-Pol's I would not do it.
    .

    Can you elaborate ? Li-Pol-e is easier to damage mechanically, but it is not a problem here. Is it about the higher short circuit current for model cells ?

    jajacek44 wrote:
    The late Nicola was both a genius and a moron or technical moron .
    For example he connected to the earth by blowing up a power station (no fuses yet)
    .
    Can you please provide more on this topic/link?
  • #9 21276466
    sq3evp
    Level 37  
    Frog_Qmak wrote:
    .
    jajacek44 wrote:
    (...)For example, it connected to the ground by blowing up a power station (no fuses yet)

    Can you please provide more on this topic/link?

    First time I've heard that it has merged with the earth - will you elaborate on what you are talking about? I'm curious too...
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #10 21276477
    chemik_16
    Level 26  
    only you still need to have a source for such cells :)
  • #11 21276487
    jajacek44
    Level 25  
    His Lordship, not fully enlightened, tried to transmit through the soil (he forgot the granite (not very funny )

    Added after 7 [minutes]:

    To @sq3evp it just shook the surrounding buildings as it blew up the power station .
  • #12 21276540
    sq3evp
    Level 37  
    Any source link? We'll have a read... I've read a lot about Tesla, but couldn't find this anywhere.
    The idea of energy transfer was very interesting - it's not possible, but maybe nobody has figured out how to do it.
    Time will tell...

    Today there is a device fitted to the F-35 aircraft which is a radar, communications antenna, transmitter for the Self-Enemy system etc. It is inconceivable that so many systems can be integrated into one system. A Class 5 aircraft and leaves behind a very small EM footprint.
  • #13 21276545
    siwy_dym
    Level 2  
    I once used such a cage for a screwdriver and it melted and the cells weren't even high current :/ Aren't you afraid that it might flow off the wall for you one day?
  • #14 21276567
    remzibi
    Level 24  
    Frog_Qmak wrote:
    .....
    Can you elaborate ? Li-Pol-e is easier to damage mechanically, but it's not a problem here. Is it about the higher short circuit current for model cells?
    .....


    Yes, Li-Pol's are easily damaged mechanically, that's one thing.
    But their biggest disadvantage, which is also from my experience, is very fast chemical degeneration and problems precisely with overheating and ignition, and this despite proper charging/discharging, BMS and not overcharging. Already after a year to two or so such a li-pol is to be thrown away because it has lost capacity. I do not want to generalise, because sometimes a Li-Pol will work long and normally, but, unfortunately, various manufacturers make these cells very unevenly in terms of the degradation parameter in time, and most of these cells are of little use after a year.
    It is different with Li-Ion, I have cells in various devices even 15 years old, which still work great, there are of course cells that also die over time (usually due to poor working conditions, overloading, excessive discharge below the acceptable threshold, etc.), but in general they are 100 times more resistant and reliable than Li-Pol.

    chemik_16 wrote:
    only you still need to have a source of such cells :)
    .

    You can buy them from people sourcing them from scrap yards, or if you have the time go there yourself from time to time :) .


    siwy_dym wrote:
    .... Aren't you afraid that it might flow off the wall for you one day?


    No, but if it happens to me, I'll describe it here.
  • #15 21276574
    siwy_dym
    Level 2  
    Ok then good luck 👀👍🐒
  • #16 21276639
    __Maciek__
    Level 20  
    gulson wrote:
    It is even possible that we will have storage without having to install panels, just to take energy when prices are negative, and to use in the evenings.


    Oh that's what I don't see ... there is no way that the average blacksmith can take advantage of negative prices ... even lower ... to the average blacksmith it is always like charging for gold. But if he produces it, he should give it away for free. That is how it works.

    The warehouse is great as long as one has time, even "Paragon" has changed the cells to large LG Chem.

    Secondly ... inverter ... ok. more and more of these hybrid ... but the vast majority of inverters in use are standard ones that push everything they take out of the panels into the grid.

    I really like the Victron concept ... despite the powerful transformer, the solution is full of finesse and well thought out. It would make me want to build my own .... and it's actually not that difficult ... just for example https://youtu.be/r60wsWmajdo?si=GMcqZhF1a7fgnm4o
    It's a bit more difficult with reverse - charging the AC from the same source. ... but it's probably just a matter of controlling the bridge on the secondary side and using the transformer itself as a choke in the boost converter.
  • #17 21276832
    gulson
    System Administrator
    __Maciek__ wrote:
    Oh I don't see that ... there is no way that the average blacksmith can take advantage of negative prices ... even lower ... the average blacksmith will always be charged like gold. But if he produces, let him give it away for free. That is how it works.
    .
    There may be negative prices on the market, but for Kowalski, adding the margin, the transmission fee, the X fee, the Y fee, the smile fee, energy will always cost. Nevertheless, certainly lower than at other times of the day and this is precisely the idea of compensation. Charge as negative prices in the market, use for the rest of the day.
  • #18 21276909
    andrzejlisek
    Level 31  
    gulson wrote:
    We will install such installations for ourselves. All the energy production will go to EjAja (AI) anyway and not for Kowalski to warm his tea.
    AI will pay well for every kWh, and the poor Kowalski will not.
    This is how they got us...
    .

    Sometimes a thought comes to mind, so hypothetically: I live in a block of flats. If I use as much electricity all the time as is used on average by at least 5 flats in this block of flats put together (assuming that I do not exceed the connection capacity and that the electrical installation in the flat can withstand an above-average load), will ZE expect me to reduce my consumption in addition to issuing an appropriate bill to pay (which I will pay every penny and on time)?

    There has been so much talk recently about reducing energy consumption, particularly unnecessary consumption. Would ZE prefer me to consume as little as possible, because costs, because ecology and whatever else comes up, or as much as possible, so that I pay them as much as possible?
  • #19 21276915
    gulson
    System Administrator
    At the moment, no and it doesn't matter if you don't exceed the declared contractual power (you have it on your contract).
    On the other hand, what will happen one day, will there be power shortages because EjAj will suck everything up.
    Will the system not collapse? You don't know.

    The trend, as you can read from the materials in English, is clear, a huge amount of energy will be needed and only countries that provide cheap energy (not necessarily clean energy - because they are already moving away from that - if we are talking about EjAj) will win. Of course, they do not have to locate any data centre in our country, in which case a huge amount of energy will not be needed, but at the same time such a country is doomed to oblivion (not to mention independence).

    Of course, this can be done by law and the development of AI can be restricted, except that again we return to the problem that such a country will simply be a condominium, heavily dependent on other countries.

    Still another possibility is that they invent something so that this AI monster does not devour so much energy.

    Generally with all the green frenzy some people can pull off, the only thing missing is a cleansing crisis, as someone said - it will suddenly change thinking 180 degrees ;) Suddenly everything will be tidy and clean.
  • #20 21276958
    remzibi
    Level 24  
    gulson wrote:
    ..... a huge amount of energy will be needed and only countries that provide cheap energy (not necessarily clean energy - as they are already moving away from that - if we are talking about EjAj) will win....
    .... that such a country will simply be a condominium, heavily dependent on other countries......


    And this is where all in white the atom comes in as the best solution, clean burning technologies with new types of coolant in reactors, you could burn the existing accumulated waste from nuclear power plants.
    But the European Nanny bans the atom and the DE even bans research and publications on it. In our country the elected people are just finishing ploughing up both the atom and AI and science and there will be nothing :) .
    So, in general, we're in the arse, and it's not even surprising that we're already starting to get the hang of it (it's an analogy with Kisiel's famous quote).
    I'm ending this quibble because the sheer uncensored words will continue to fall :) .
  • #21 21276960
    gulson
    System Administrator
    I, however, am thinking positively and hoping for sobriety.
    As I wrote, sometimes one thing changes the perspective by 180 degrees.
    That's why it's going to be hard, because all of Europe is lagging behind, but I'm optimistic 💪.
  • #22 21277316
    LEDówki
    Level 43  
    18650 size batteries are cheap because there are a lot of them. Used mainly in laptops, they have one disadvantage - a low maximum current. Those used in vehicles and power tools have a higher maximum current, but also a higher price.
    Lithium polymer batteries, a variation of lithium ion batteries. As with gel batteries, the electrolyte is trapped in the polymer. This makes them small, lightweight, suitable for powering phones and it is not clear why they are called batteries.
    In contrast, batteries for powering homes are called storage batteries. Batteries of serially connected batteries - stringers (ladies may have a different opinion about stringers).
    A colleague seems to have assembled a number of batteries in series and connected them in parallel?
    Wouldn't it have been better, following the example of factory batteries, to first assemble batteries in parallel and then connect them in series? Maybe this is due to the disparity in the parameters of the batteries (secondary cells)? When connecting electrochemical cells into batteries, the emphasis is always on making the cells the same (voltage, capacity, internal resistance).
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #23 21277518
    remzibi
    Level 24  
    gulson wrote:
    ......sometimes one thing changes the perspective by 180 degrees......


    War, quickly and effectively straightens perspective.




    LEDówki wrote:
    .....
    A colleague seems to have assembled a number of batteries in series and connected them in parallel?
    Wasn't it better, following the example of factory batteries, to first assemble a battery of parallel connected batteries and then connect them in series? .......


    In order not to waste time with mindless polemics, I will just so tentatively remind you that there is such a thing as Addition Alternation as one of the foundations of mathematics.
    I recommend reading the link https://zpe.gov.pl/a/przemiennosc-dodawania/D5hBYuiqV

    Image illustrating the commutative property of addition using apples. .
  • #24 21277550
    Janusz_kk
    Level 39  
    remzibi wrote:
    this is just a tentative reminder that there is such a thing as Additive Alternation as one of the foundations of mathematics.
    .
    But only mathematics, with links it does not work.
  • #25 21277619
    remzibi
    Level 24  
    Janusz_kk wrote:
    remzibi wrote:
    this is just a tentative reminder that there is such a thing as Alternating Addition as one of the foundations of mathematics.
    .
    But only mathematics, with links it does not work.


    I forgot to add and Alternating Multiplication. :) and a mindless discussion develops. :) .
    So you think that if I add a pack of 3 cells in series connected in parallel to a second pack of 3 cells connected in parallel, it will be a different pack altogether than when I add another 2 in parallel to the two cells connected in series?
    That supposedly 2 width x 3rownol = 6 is different to 3rownol x 2 width = 6?
    Janusz - have you gone mad? :)
  • #26 21277644
    exlibris71
    Level 17  
    remzibi wrote:
    That 2 width x 3rownol = 6 is supposedly different from 3rownol x 2 width = 6 ?
    .

    Seemingly the same and yet not. :) How do you balance parallel connected rows of cells? A separate balancer on each row?
  • #27 21277650
    remzibi
    Level 24  
    exlibris71 wrote:
    remzibi wrote:
    That supposedly 2 width x 3rownol = 6 is different from 3rownol x 2 width = 6 ?
    .

    Seemingly the same and yet not. :) How do you balance parallel connected rows of cells? On each row a separate balancer?


    Surrenders. :) .
    I balance the whole stock exactly identically with a 2S3P connection as with a 3P2S connection, :) hint that even with the same balancer. :)
  • #28 21277654
    andrzejlisek
    Level 31  
    Since we are talking about alternation and connectivity of mathematical operations, let us consider two cases composed of 12 links, because that is what the question boils down to.

    For simplicity, we assume that each cell has a voltage of 4V and a capacity of 1A.

    Case 1:
    We create three sets of four cells connected in series. Each set has a voltage of 16V and an efficiency of 1A. We then connect the entire sets in parallel to obtain a battery with a voltage of 16V and a capacity of 3A.

    Case 2:
    We create four sets of three cells connected in parallel. Each set has a voltage of 4V and a capacity of 3A. We then connect the whole sets in series, obtaining a battery with a voltage of 16V and a capacity of 3A.

    As you can see, both cases result in a battery with the same voltage and the same current capacity. For reliability, does it matter which configuration one chooses (leaving aside the cost and ease of battery construction)? Given these most basic mathematical principles, one can conclude that it does not matter.
  • #29 21277666
    remzibi
    Level 24  
    andrzejlisek wrote:
    Since we are talking about ........ that it doesn't matter.


    Generally, I'm assuming that the discussion is about my stock (the main topic of the thread), and therefore the connection as in case #2, which is how you connect essentially all factory cells to be optimised for balancer handling. And this is exclusively what we are talking about.
    On the other hand, there at the beginning, I so understood, someone expressed a doubt as to whether one should connect in series first, or perhaps in parallel first - well that is completely irrelevant - that is why I wrote about alternation, so that a mindless discussion would not develop - which surprisingly did develop anyway :) .
    I'll say it again - if I assemble the magazine in such a way that I first assemble 14 packs of X cells in parallel and then smoke those packs in series, then exactly the same thing will come out if I connect 14 sections of 1 cell each and then add up to X cells in each section in parallel - it makes absolutely NO difference :) - uuufffff
    From the point of view of convenience and ease of use, it is of course much more convenient to add to each section, which I also described in the first post :)
  • #30 21277695
    LEDówki
    Level 43  
    Fellow mathematicians are overlooking one important detail - three series batteries will have three separate protections. One series battery will have one protection even though it consists of parallel batteries (mixed electrochemical cell combination). Electrical engineering is not mathematics for a 10-year-old. If it were, the children would be assembling the battery packs themselves, which is not in their heads.
    The author explained, so I don't have any more questions about it, except maybe one - is there a protection device, a so-called BMS? What is its maximum current? What are the limiting voltages? Does it have a circuit to balance the voltage of the cells in the battery?

    The author has assembled a battery from matched and random batteries. It is very likely that the Author has not read anything about how electrochemical cells are connected. If he had read, he would have directly answered the question about how to combine cells. Thus, it is very likely that the Author is not shying away from basic mistakes or errors that other battery designers have made. The experiments were carried out a little over a hundred years ago, everything is well described and there is no need to make mistakes from years ago.
    100 la ago there were electric cars with lithium ion battery packs and they failed because of the characteristics of the batteries. I will remind some that back then there was no internet, no documentation, no Aliexpress. Back then it was much harder to get knowledge and materials, yet somehow they managed.

Topic summary

The discussion revolves around the construction and testing of a 24kWh energy storage system using recycled 18650 lithium-ion cells, inspired by the "Paragon" class energy storage concept. The author reports successful usability testing, with the system capable of powering a household for up to 36 hours under heavy usage. Concerns about safety, particularly regarding fire risks associated with lithium-ion batteries, are raised, alongside discussions on the ecological benefits of recycling old cells. Participants debate the feasibility of using such systems in residential settings, the importance of proper battery management systems (BMS), and the potential for future energy independence through home energy storage solutions. The conversation also touches on the implications of energy pricing and the role of renewable energy sources.
Summary generated by the language model.
ADVERTISEMENT