Czy wolisz polską wersję strony elektroda?
Nie, dziękuję Przekieruj mnie tamtoma1981 wrote:twist and insulate with insulating tape, I will add that the joint will be a roof in a dry place.
toma1981 wrote:Yes.So only MC4 terminals for connecting the solar cable, yes.
toma1981 wrote:Hey, I have to extend the cables to the panels, how to do it on the MC4 connectors or just twist the pig's face and insulate it with insulating tape, I will add that the connection will be an attic in a dry place.
ja_pizgam wrote:@Krzychooo after actions with plugs for RTX 4000 cards, I would not be so sure if soldering is a good thing ...
Krzychooo wrote:Soldering won't beat, no miracle nipples.
Janusz_kk wrote:Krzychooo wrote:Soldering will not beat anything, no miracle nipples.
You just don't have anything to secure the solder well and with DC no kidding, a well crimped connector is just as good as solder and is tight and has adequate insulation. So your advice is harmful and could lead to a fire.
Krzychooo wrote:Before you judge someone or something, think carefully about what you write because your advice could be harmful and lead to a fire.
Krzychooo wrote:I solder everything all my life, not only in cars. Others used all kinds of couplings. I've never called firefighters and saw a few fires.
Janusz_kk wrote:I am also 60+
Janusz_kk wrote:... so this can end this stupid discussion.
Krzychooo wrote:... but who will hold it against him ... (?)
Krzychooo wrote:
Last about a year ago, the roof with panels was on fire ... Diagnosis - poor connectors, from different manufacturers (in pairs).
Baqo wrote:Krzychooo wrote:
Last about a year ago, the roof with panels was on fire ... Diagnosis - poor connectors, from different manufacturers (in pairs).
It will not help here, even if the ends of the connector are pressed and soldered, the contact remains unmatched (in pairs).
Krzychooo wrote:It is enough to tug the cable harder and the connector lets go (it's crimped).
Baqo wrote:It will not help here, even if the ends of the connector are pressed and soldered, the contact remains unmatched (in pairs).
Janusz_kk wrote:... the cables must not even be stretched, let alone plucked ...
The installation has to be checked after connection to check if it reaches the rated current and if the pyrometer / camera does not heat up ...
novik wrote:I am interested in problems with possible complaints and service.
Whether it depends on the seller.
I have offers from the j-point store, the price is around 2000, other, Allegro -2200-2500. The difference is, but more important is action.
Janusz_kk wrote:On 11, two are warming up, maybe they were dirty or underpressed?
Janusz_kk wrote:And what kind of test is it anyway, because the picture itself is not enough.
Krzychooo wrote:What do you not understand?
Krzychooo wrote:consisting in checking the temperature of individual connectors under load with a thermal imaging camera.
There were 11 pieces in total, MC4 and MC3.
Krzychooo wrote:And that's what "all two", underpressed, dirty, etc. are all about.
unvoid wrote:@ja_pizgam After three weeks of reporting the problem to Sofar (among other things, I had to record a video showing the behavior of the inverters. Maybe it was hard for them to take my word for it) and tormenting them with phone calls every few days, I received the G3.65 firmware (the previous one was G3.60) which completely solved my problems. Since the update, the inverters have been getting up nicely, evenly and (interestingly) they also work almost silently (you have to get closer and focus to hear anything. Previously, even after a finger restart during the day, they made a clear sound audible from a distance) so there was something on things. Maybe someone will have a similar problem, so attach the firmware - you use at your own risk . Useful especially for those who are already out of warranty or do not have an invoice for inverters. I have no idea if the firmware was prepared universally or for my specific case (because it took quite a long time according to the Polish branch of the service they encountered such a problem for the first time the control panel required recording from the scene to further push the case). Please note that this is the firmware for the Sofar 3300TL-G3 (single phase) with the serial number starting SA3EXXXXXXXXX. I have 3 of them (one per phase) and all three have adopted the new firmware and in the case of all three it helped. There is always a risk of damaging the inverter with inappropriate software, so first I recommend reporting the problem to Sofar ( 48 22 428 50 99 service.pl(goryl)sofarsolar.com). Instructions for updating are in the official manual for this series of inverters (SOFAR1.1_3.3KTL-G3 user manual). Personally, I put the files into the root directory of mass storage (FAT32, NTFS does not recognize it at all) and into the firmware subdirectory. I do not know where the inverters finally downloaded the files. The update time of one inverter is about 15 minutes therefore I recommend updating in the middle of the best sunny day.
domino10021975 wrote:I would not like to return the inverter to the service because I feel sorry for the lost KWh.
TL;DR: Field owners report 0–20 % daily energy loss when Sofar inverters trip on 253 V grid peaks; “set Country Code 12 for Poland and the problem goes away” [Elektroda, 3301, post #18624621] Why it matters: one menu setting often fixes most unexpected shutdowns without replacing hardware.
• Max. DC input voltage 1000 V & MPPT window 240-850 V (Sofar 8.8KTL-X manual [Uri, #18921613]) • Recommended DC/AC oversize ratio ≤ 1.2 : 1 for KTL-X models [Elektroda, BikeBarian, post #18360391] • Country Code list: PL = 12, DE = 07, NL = 05 [Elektroda, Defence & 3301, post #18851696] • Typical firmware: V2.30 (increases AC limit from 4.0 kW to 4.4 kW on 4.4KTL-X) [Elektroda, prose, post #19034268] • Service e-mail: service.pl@sofarsolar.com; hotline +48 22 123 98 58 [Elektroda, AT PRO, post #18772451]