Czy wolisz polską wersję strony elektroda?
Nie, dziękuję Przekieruj mnie tamkudlatyy1 wrote:Not different boards, but the use of different elements: - these diodes probably have a protective function and in one case ordinary diodes were used, in the other - Zener ones. A common practice of "modernization" of equipment of this size, not very well proving its quality and refinement.different boards and there you have to watch out for diode polarity ...
aaanteka wrote:It's not exactly how you write. Usually, the project is developed by the manufacturer and commissioned by it. It is more advantageous for him if, after some time, the production company has the option of licensing the same product to another market, often on its own internal market - the agreements are different in this respect. But those who outsource and order in Chinese production plants know it well.
And the designation you provide, unfortunately, applies to the converter transformer and is analogous to other previous amplifier models.
Quote:Not different boards, but the use of different elements: - these diodes probably have a protective function and in one case ordinary diodes were used, in the other - Zener ones.
Q-mac wrote:Which products appeared quite recently, long after the products of the German manufacturer were on the market. So what do you think in such a "large amount" indicates this producer? Moreover, the manufacturer announced such a series of amplifiers long before they appeared on the market. and the fundamental question, have you physically seen the amplifiers that you think were first produced by the company you mentioned?Kobble audio
Q-mac wrote:Costly fun and the results are poor. Who needs an amplifier with such parameters at home, even assuming the use at the level of 10-20%, this equipment is energy-consuming despite the impulse power supply not made in accordance with the applicable standards (no PFC). In addition, it can do quite a bit of damage to a typical household's power grid.By buying this tip for PLN 400-500, repairing it for another 200 (gratuities from a Chinaman), you can have fun.
Q-mac wrote:Yes, and the 4x1200W amplifier. Not even the 4x300W?If someone likes to make a party for several dozen people
aaanteka wrote:It is even enough to check since the company registered the domain. Even at the beginning of this topic, as everyone was looking for materials, your offer did not exist. If you show a need, what prevents you from asking this company about their products?
Q-mac wrote:Yes, and the 4x1200W amplifier. Not even the 4x300W?If someone likes to make a party for several dozen people
aaanteka wrote:A colleague diligently avoids answering the questions asked and the arguments of pointless repair and destiny presented in them.
I am not complaining but realistically I present the shortcomings of an inept attempt to design a device. It is not enough to use proven elements in some configuration, suggesting only one of the element parameters given as the maximum value. It is not enough to take into account only correct operation only from the electronic side in the project, disregarding the actual operating conditions and the basic laws of physics. And in the construction of this amplifier all these mistakes were made. It's fair to say that this the design is actually a standard example of how devices should not be designed . This is probably clearly indicated by the fact that the manufacturer accepted the return of the last series of these amplifiers and a full refund for devices purchased even a year ago, no matter who and how they were operated and whether the amplifiers were damaged.
Oddly enough, returns equipment instead of being recycled, it ended up in Poland and is sold. Instead of paying for disposal, someone still makes money by selling garbage to unsuspecting, incorrigible amateur dreamers. I do not know if this topic has been used for this purpose for some time, promoting cheap repair options, which is not entirely true. Whoever does not believe, can easily browse this topic, for example, make a list of the elements needed for repair at current prices and verify the profitability of such a procedure.
Domain registration is crucial as it is the only form of advertising that appeared anywhere with this product before that fact. What's more, you can easily find an economic entity and its entry in the register. What's more, the equipment has not appeared in any industry catalog, on any vortal of producers and distributors of audio equipment, as well as, unlike the German product, at trade fairs here in Europe and Asia ( I am writing this based on my own experience ).
koziorozec wrote:Why this profitability discussion?
I personally am very happy with this topic, I have several such amplifiers and I am happy to learn power supply topology trying to fix it , I can afford to make fireworks, so despite the financial unreasonableness of lifting this amplifier gives me great joy and learn a lot from it, which is invaluable.
koziorozec wrote:The current test is done by a clever transformer, the rest rather simple, what do you think
aaanteka wrote:- the repair is pointless due to a completely incorrect construction, incorrect assumptions of the constructor, misinterpretation of single border parameters detached from other elements as nominal parameters
- you can fix something that has been properly constructed and functioned properly at least once.
Ziemowit1973 wrote:There was already about this nonsensical solution: -conventional power supply on a 230V / 50Hz transformer is the second housing such as an amplifier due to the power it must provide and its efficiency, dimensions must be appropriate. Secondly, the cost of a transformer with 6 secondary windings is an individual order or implementation associated with a significant cost. Summing up, at such a cost you can buy two decent stage amplifiers, for example on the secondary marketHow would I make a completely separate power supply for all voltages, will this end be then recommendable for events where we care about failure-free ???
Ziemowit1973 wrote:Quite "naive reasoning", because the amplifier is made in accordance with such and not other supplies and its protection circuits, including limiter circuits, are appropriately selected. And it is still a significant power of the power supply, because you need to provide 4x800W = 3200W (3.2kW).or maybe lower something to be safer, I don't need full power - 4x800 would be enough
-DeX- wrote:. They are generally available from domestic distributors, including the largest.I also have SG3523 drivers (version with a wider housing), I can withdraw.
TL;DR: Field tests show idle draw ≈ 70 W and IGBT blow-ups can occur < 5 s after power-up if a channel shorts[Elektroda, Q-mac, post #18986130][Elektroda, Matek920605, post #18378061]; “this design is a ‘ticking bomb’”[Elektroda, aaanteka, post #18433299]—yet 90 % of outages come from six gate-drive parts.
Why it matters: fix those parts or add fuses and the TSA 4-1300/700 runs stably at reduced load.
• Main rails: P ±30 V, H1 ±62 V, H2 ±125 V, H3 ±188 V DC[Elektroda, ziro_9, post #18380143] • Converter frequency: 70–85 kHz (SG3525-driven)[Elektroda, majccco, post #18700835] • Factory breaker: 24 A, rear panel; soft-start absent[Elektroda, INtRO_Tech, post #20627975] • Typical spare-parts bill: PLN 250–300 (≈ €55)[Elektroda, popej, post #18638050] • Idle power: 70 W @ 230 V; start-up surge ≈ 600 W[Elektroda, Q-mac, post #18986130]