logo elektroda
logo elektroda
X
logo elektroda
ADVERTISEMENT
Treść została przetłumaczona polish » english Zobacz oryginalną wersję tematu
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #122 19769786
    yogi009
    Level 43  
    Olkus wrote:
    But I do not recommend buying them.


    I acquired them for these comparisons on purpose :-)
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #124 19769816
    Olkus
    Level 32  
    romarcin wrote:
    Olkus wrote:
    now Jamicon belongs to Yageo
    according to Wikipedia, Yageo and KEMET are one corporation, Jamicon is not mentioned at all https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yageo


    Wikipedia does not contain everything ;)

    Greetings,
    AND.

    Added after 50 [seconds]:

    yogi009 wrote:
    Olkus wrote:
    But I do not recommend buying them.


    I acquired them for these comparisons on purpose :-)


    It's a bad competition for Nichicon, a one-hit knockout :)

    Greetings,
    AND.
  • #125 19769857
    liseczq
    Level 21  
    yogi009 wrote:
    liseczq wrote:
    Looking at the new one, the OPA is practically weaker than the LME in everything.


    Because it is. I did comparisons on the dual OPA and the entire LME series. These are good op amps, but OPA2134 has long been referred to in the West as a good entry-level opamp for audio applications. Now you should probably take e.g. LME49860 (or the neighboring models) and the LME49600 buffer at the output.


    I have an LME49860 at home, and my colleague "FIMEK" claims that the OPA134 has almost cosmic parameters, it is dedicated to headphones and it is much better to use it as a headphone amplifier.

    Please see the first page of the topic. There is a detailed description of my amplifier and the elements used in it.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #126 19769871
    yogi009
    Level 43  
    liseczq wrote:
    I have LME49860 at home, and my colleague "FIMEK" claims that OPA134 has almost cosmic parameters


    Well, now it's clear.
  • #127 19769913
    Fimek
    Level 16  
    liseczq wrote:
    yogi009 wrote:
    liseczq wrote:
    Looking at the new one, the OPA is practically weaker than the LME in everything.


    Because it is. I did comparisons on the dual OPA and the entire LME series. These are good op amps, but OPA2134 has long been referred to in the West as a good entry-level opamp for audio applications. Now you should probably take e.g. LME49860 (or the neighboring models) and the LME49600 buffer at the output.


    I have an LME49860 at home, and my colleague "FIMEK" claims that the OPA134 has almost cosmic parameters, it is dedicated to headphones and it is much better to use it as a headphone amplifier.

    Invite the topic page. There is a detailed description of my amplifier and the elements used in it.


    OK, my mistake, I fixated on the presented diagram, where there was NE ... and not LME ... Now it remains for me to ask what these distortions are after equipping the opamp with the power stage? You write that small, which is probably true, but what?
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #128 19769950
    liseczq
    Level 21  
    Fimek wrote:
    liseczq wrote:
    yogi009 wrote:
    liseczq wrote:
    Looking at the new one, the OPA is practically weaker than the LME in everything.


    Because it is. I did comparisons on the dual OPA and the entire LME series. These are good op amps, but OPA2134 has long been referred to in the West as a good entry-level opamp for audio applications. Now you should probably take e.g. LME49860 (or the neighboring models) and the LME49600 buffer at the output.


    I have an LME49860 at home, and my colleague "FIMEK" claims that the OPA134 has almost cosmic parameters, it is dedicated to headphones and it is much better to use it as a headphone amplifier.

    Invite the topic page. There is a detailed description of my amplifier and the elements used in it.


    OK, my mistake, I fixated on the presented diagram, where there was NE ... and not LME ... Now it remains for me to ask what these distortions are after equipping the opamp with the power stage? You write that small, which is probably true, but what?


    I will connect the oscilloscope during Christmas and we will measure.
  • #129 19769982
    romarcin
    Level 20  
    liseczq wrote:
    I will connect the oscilloscope during Christmas and we will measure.
    the oscilloscope shows the distortions when they are single percentages, only very good sound card and e.g. ARTA
  • #130 19770684
    liseczq
    Level 21  
    It is a pity that many of the readers do not read the text, but go the easy way and look at the photos.

    I am waiting as soon as someone asks where I live, because in the diagram from 1982 I posted it says that the network has 220V instead of 230V

Topic summary

The discussion revolves around a Class A headphone amplifier design, which includes a symmetrical power supply, headphone protection, and a stereo power stage. Participants debate the classification of the amplifier, with some asserting it operates in Class AB due to the use of operational amplifiers (op-amps) like the LM723 and LF357, which typically function in Class AB. Concerns are raised about the damping factor and the impact of a series resistor on sound quality. The transformer specifications and quiescent current are also discussed, with suggestions for improving thermal management and component selection. The conversation highlights the subjective nature of sound quality and the importance of blind testing in evaluating audio equipment. Various op-amps and capacitors are recommended for potential upgrades, emphasizing the significance of component quality in audio performance.
Summary generated by the language model.
ADVERTISEMENT