Czy wolisz polską wersję strony elektroda?
Nie, dziękuję Przekieruj mnie tamOlkus wrote:according to Wikipedia, Yageo and KEMET are one corporation, Jamicon is not mentioned at all https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yageonow Jamicon belongs to Yageo
romarcin wrote:Olkus wrote:according to Wikipedia, Yageo and KEMET are one corporation, Jamicon is not mentioned at all https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yageonow Jamicon belongs to Yageo
yogi009 wrote:Olkus wrote:But I do not recommend buying them.
I acquired them for these comparisons on purpose![]()
yogi009 wrote:liseczq wrote:Looking at the new one, the OPA is practically weaker than the LME in everything.
Because it is. I did comparisons on the dual OPA and the entire LME series. These are good op amps, but OPA2134 has long been referred to in the West as a good entry-level opamp for audio applications. Now you should probably take e.g. LME49860 (or the neighboring models) and the LME49600 buffer at the output.
liseczq wrote:yogi009 wrote:liseczq wrote:Looking at the new one, the OPA is practically weaker than the LME in everything.
Because it is. I did comparisons on the dual OPA and the entire LME series. These are good op amps, but OPA2134 has long been referred to in the West as a good entry-level opamp for audio applications. Now you should probably take e.g. LME49860 (or the neighboring models) and the LME49600 buffer at the output.
I have an LME49860 at home, and my colleague "FIMEK" claims that the OPA134 has almost cosmic parameters, it is dedicated to headphones and it is much better to use it as a headphone amplifier.
Invite the topic page. There is a detailed description of my amplifier and the elements used in it.
Fimek wrote:liseczq wrote:yogi009 wrote:liseczq wrote:Looking at the new one, the OPA is practically weaker than the LME in everything.
Because it is. I did comparisons on the dual OPA and the entire LME series. These are good op amps, but OPA2134 has long been referred to in the West as a good entry-level opamp for audio applications. Now you should probably take e.g. LME49860 (or the neighboring models) and the LME49600 buffer at the output.
I have an LME49860 at home, and my colleague "FIMEK" claims that the OPA134 has almost cosmic parameters, it is dedicated to headphones and it is much better to use it as a headphone amplifier.
Invite the topic page. There is a detailed description of my amplifier and the elements used in it.
OK, my mistake, I fixated on the presented diagram, where there was NE ... and not LME ... Now it remains for me to ask what these distortions are after equipping the opamp with the power stage? You write that small, which is probably true, but what?
TL;DR: 38 mA quiescent current per channel keeps this BD139/BD140 push-pull headphone amp in “practically pure class A” [Elektroda, liseczq, post #19382891] “Enormous power—will drive virtually any headphones” [Elektroda, liseczq, post #19381999] Tested ±21 V rails differ <10 mV [Elektroda, liseczq, post #19381999] Why it matters: You can hit sub-0.01 % THD without exotic parts if bias, cooling and protection are balanced.
• Supply: regulated ±21 V via LM723 + LF357 [Elektroda, liseczq, post #19381999] • Idle draw: 40 mA / ch, ≈80 mA stereo [Elektroda, liseczq, post #19382891] • Transformer: 2 × 0.44 A secondaries, 20 W total [Elektroda, liseczq, post #19382510] • Output stage: BD139/BD140, safe ≈1 W into 8 Ω or any headphones [Elektroda, conisl, post #19382126] • Protection: uPC1237—3 s delay, DC & clip cut-off, relay isolated [Elektroda, liseczq, post #19381999]