CMS wrote:In that case, I suggest such a socket.I do not want to paste anything.
Czy wolisz polską wersję strony elektroda?
Nie, dziękuję Przekieruj mnie tam
E8600 wrote:Great, but there are two problems with this socket. 1. How to mount such a socket in a rectangular hole ?. 2. It does not meet the requirements of col. CMS . "connector for an external power supply, with the option of disconnecting battery power after connecting?". PS To avoid pasting, you can use the Col. Removed advice.In that case, I suggest such a socket.
Usunięty.jpg
(1.45 MB)
You must be logged in to download this attachment.
CMS wrote:This hole is at the height of the LED backlight. The point is that the legs of this LED have occurred because they protrude beyond the outline of the pcb. If someone turns it over and the hole is at the bottom it can be used for something else.I mean, this hole has factory destiny. I do not want to paste anything. If I'm right, I want to insert a dedicated connector.
it's about inductance. No matter what type, whether axial chokes, or coils wound by me or a clutch, everything is as a resistor. Once it only detected as a coil. What is wrong?
lukashb wrote:Surely the coil you want to measure has a different value, like:No matter what type, whether axial chokes, or coils wound by me or a clutch, everything is as a resistor. Once it only detected as a coil. What is wrong?
Adamcyn wrote:. 0.01mH = 10?H and the value lower than this will not be measured, this also applies to values higher than those that are provided for this tester. Greetings.Probably out of range - inductance 0.01mH-20H.
vodiczka wrote:Oh, there, probably a colleague did not expect such a quick delivery. I ordered (23.08) probably on Thursday and on Tuesday the package arrived. (in the meantime "wekend")Where's planning, buddy?I bought it the next day after ordering, it lay and waited for its tester.
E8600 wrote:That's how I made the calibration, and in total nothing has changed, and yes, I have switched to other openings. I will try other coils, although I am convinced that they should be measured because they were in the range. But I will see what and how. Of course, the battery is new.lukashb wrote:Did you do the calibration?It seems to be all right, although what I care most about is detected as ... an ordinary resistor is about inductance
rafcio_21 wrote:It is a pity that you do not have a second tester under the hand with the original soft for comparison. Because maybe soft is the culprit. It would be useful for such a test in this section. Did someone pull the original soft from the processor so that you could come back as if what? I have poor detection of small inductances. Tested a colleague how is it with elements from outside the declared ranges on this changed software?Measuring the relay coil and measuring the buzzer
E8600 wrote:In some time I will have a friend tester with original soft (in order to modify it), I can compare some results but I've already tested my before and after uploading and I would definitely not return to the original. Now the possibilities are much bigger, I am waiting for the inverters from China and I will still be able to measure zener diodes and LMxxx stabilizers.rafcio_21 wrote:It is a pity that you do not have a second tester under the hand with the original soft for comparison. Because maybe soft is the culprit. It would be useful for such a test in this section. Did someone pull the original soft from the processor so that you could come back as if what? I have poor detection of small inductances. Tested a colleague how is it with elements from outside the declared ranges on this changed software?Measuring the relay coil and measuring the buzzer
rafcio_21 wrote:How would you like me mainly for coils and transistors. Understand that this soft allows the measurement of stabilizers (would be useful)? I read that I was also tested by a soft colleague with 16 MHz quartz. Man hope that the final version of the software will come out with all language patches and, of course, the electrode logo.In some time I will have a friend tester with original soft (in order to modify it), I can compare some results but I've already tested my before and after uploading and I would definitely not return to the original. Now the possibilities are much bigger, I am waiting for the inverters from China and I will still be able to measure zener diodes and LMxxx stabilizers.
gumisie wrote:Probably. It is a pity that we Gulson he had not sent those testers before. For example, for the First Communion.Probably a change in the inductance value and the second result on resistance, or the wave resistance of this circuit.
Adamcyn wrote:Indeed, a man with such a tester on the electronics exchange some 30-40 years ago would be LordIt is a pity that Gulson did not send us these testers a bit earlier. For example, for the First Communion
As you can see the finger can replace the electrolytic capacitor. 
Due to the very weak contact I had to measure SMD mosfets in this way. He could detect a mosfet with a depleted channel and even Jfet. 
It detects correctly when correctly connected. 
Recently I bought mosfet transistors with P channel which I will check too.
vodiczka wrote:Such a situationalien90fr wrote:Where's planning, buddy?Today I got a whole and healthy tester, I just need to buy a battery
I'm going for the batteries tomorrow!
E8600 wrote:Quartz 16MHZ is testing a colleague from work, the Polish language also has on my tester this soft would not work, I suspect that it was quartz wine 16 MHZ because I had to disassemble and I had no other change, and now I have English menu and quartz 8 MHZ, measurement of zests and LMxxxx is possible on this software, requires a 40V converter and some modifications. As for the final version, I use the knowledge of electrode colleagues who have much more knowledge from merafcio_21 wrote:How would you like me mainly for coils and transistors. Understand that this soft allows the measurement of stabilizers (would be useful)? I read that I was also tested by a soft colleague with 16 MHz quartz. Man hope that the final version of the software will come out with all language patches and, of course, the electrode logo.In some time I will have a friend tester with original soft (in order to modify it), I can compare some results but I've already tested my before and after uploading and I would definitely not return to the original. Now the possibilities are much bigger, I am waiting for the inverters from China and I will still be able to measure zener diodes and LMxxx stabilizers.
.
lukashb wrote:I fully agree with this statement (functional). If it shows us some nonsense, we can still say that there is something wrong with this item being tested, it just is not working. Greetings. I recommend the topic: https://www.elektroda.pl/rtvforum/topic3382383.html#16732819I will say yes, a generally good tester, but of course you know the good parts.
lukashb wrote:If you mean the nH government, there is nothing at a reasonable price. It's easier to count than to measure.but the ones that allow me to match the choke to the radio construction, this tiny, axial,
lukashb wrote:By. I do not have a better one considering the relation between price and possibility.I will say yes, the tester is generally good
Adamcyn wrote:You can do it on your own, the cost is the price: display + microprocessor, I made my own on PIC16F628 + 16x2 LCD. Greetings.If you mean the nH government, there is nothing at a reasonable price.
TL;DR: LCR-T4 auto-tests 14 part types, draws only 12-15 mA per measurement, and “will be useful in every workshop” [Elektroda, TechEkspert, post #16556695] Accuracy stays within ±2 % for most resistors. Firmware flashing adds live-scan mode and Zener tests. Why it matters: you get multimeter-level insight from a €10 gadget.
• Supply: 9 V battery; 12-15 mA active, 20 nA sleep [Elektroda, 16556695] • R range: 0.1 Ω – 50 MΩ, C range: 25 pF – 100 000 µF, L range: 0.01 mH – 20 H [Elektroda, 16556695] • Typical accuracy: ±1 % R, ±3 % C, ±5 % L (user tests) [Elektroda, 16556695] • ESR read-out for electrolytics ≥1 µF [Elektroda, post #16556695] • Open-source firmware: AVR-based, 40 V boost for Zener mode [Elektroda, 16666684]
